I like most of it, but i doubt FSHP, Munich, and probably Velva should bve that high. Some teams to mention are Lakota, Hatton, Casselton, Langdon(?) maybe, mine is like this: 1. Bishop Ryan 2. Grafton 3. Lamoure 4. Munich 5. Dakota Prairie 6. Thompson 7. Hatton 8. FSHP 9. Lakota 10. Casselton/Velva/Langdon. I really like DP for this upcoming season. They have been really young for a long time and now like a couple years ago, are starting to put it together.BballFan1307 wrote:1. Bishop Ryan
2. Lamoure
3. FSHP
4. Munich Starkweather
5.Grafton
6. Dakota Prairie
7.Velva
8.Thompson?
9. not sure on the last two?
any suggestions?
this is probably going to get ripped apart tried the best i could
Nothing wrong with that, I'm just saying that FSHP got hot at the right time and probably wont have that this year. But they have a young team so we'll see.BballFan1307 wrote:i put those 3 up that high, because they showed they had what it took to get to the state tournament, unlike a H-N, Casselton(who FSHP beat first round of the tournament), and DP. Thompson lost basically everyone but Cooley wouldnt have them ranked so high. And Lamoure is just good, even though FSHP beat them last year they might be the favorite, but i think that regions a toss up. SO yeah thats my justification for having those teams higher in the poll.
Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
Is steele even going to be able to have a team next year?Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
baseballlvr wrote:Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
I agree, but with Grafton, the top pitcher can't pitch every game, even though they still have Martinez (also a good pitcher) on the side, but they're only two guys. who else do they have?
lutovsky doesnt throw 80, and ive never seen any of the others pitch, but i know lutovsky doesnt throw 80, wasnt he at the mandan camp and only hit like 78 tops?spoilers23 wrote:baseballlvr wrote:Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
I agree, but with Grafton, the top pitcher can't pitch every game, even though they still have Martinez (also a good pitcher) on the side, but they're only two guys. who else do they have?
martinez, jordan lutovsky, garet molde, and luke paulson all can hit low 80s with their fastballs. lutovsky is as good as anybody. paulson is one of the top lefties in the state. molde's got a good fastball with a lot of movement on it. we also have a solid closer in mike bartunek.
baseball1981 wrote:lutovsky doesnt throw 80, and ive never seen any of the others pitch, but i know lutovsky doesnt throw 80, wasnt he at the mandan camp and only hit like 78 tops?spoilers23 wrote:baseballlvr wrote:Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
I agree, but with Grafton, the top pitcher can't pitch every game, even though they still have Martinez (also a good pitcher) on the side, but they're only two guys. who else do they have?
martinez, jordan lutovsky, garet molde, and luke paulson all can hit low 80s with their fastballs. lutovsky is as good as anybody. paulson is one of the top lefties in the state. molde's got a good fastball with a lot of movement on it. we also have a solid closer in mike bartunek.
lol ok so he beat a team that couldnt hit, we had 3 hitters ok, rogelstad krahler and feakes was ok...so he pretty much shut down a team that couldnt hit, his stuff is meat to a good hitter, all he has is a straight fastball at 78 mph ched which will get it done in class b baseball in north dakotabanthedh wrote:I might have read the paper wrong but didn't lutoski kick seven kinds of dog crap out of harvey at sate last year
baseball1981 wrote:lol ok so he beat a team that couldnt hit, we had 3 hitters ok, rogelstad krahler and feakes was ok...so he pretty much shut down a team that couldnt hit, his stuff is meat to a good hitter, all he has is a straight fastball at 78 mph ched which will get it done in class b baseball in north dakotabanthedh wrote:I might have read the paper wrong but didn't lutoski kick seven kinds of dog crap out of harvey at sate last year
ducks wrote:1 Bishop Ryan
2 Lamoure
3 Munich Starkweather
4 Dakota Prairie
5 Grafton
6 FSHP
7 Hatton Northwood
8 Lakota
9 Velva
10 Thompson
baseball1981 wrote:lol ok so he beat a team that couldnt hit, we had 3 hitters ok, rogelstad krahler and feakes was ok...so he pretty much shut down a team that couldnt hit, his stuff is meat to a good hitter, all he has is a straight fastball at 78 mph ched which will get it done in class b baseball in north dakotabanthedh wrote:I might have read the paper wrong but didn't lutoski kick seven kinds of dog crap out of harvey at sate last year
spoilers23 wrote:baseball1981 wrote:lutovsky doesnt throw 80, and ive never seen any of the others pitch, but i know lutovsky doesnt throw 80, wasnt he at the mandan camp and only hit like 78 tops?spoilers23 wrote:baseballlvr wrote:Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
I agree, but with Grafton, the top pitcher can't pitch every game, even though they still have Martinez (also a good pitcher) on the side, but they're only two guys. who else do they have?
martinez, jordan lutovsky, garet molde, and luke paulson all can hit low 80s with their fastballs. lutovsky is as good as anybody. paulson is one of the top lefties in the state. molde's got a good fastball with a lot of movement on it. we also have a solid closer in mike bartunek.
i believe jordan threw 79 each of the past two years at the mandan camp but i know for a fact he has thrown harder than that.
tadam6 wrote:spoilers23 wrote:baseball1981 wrote:lutovsky doesnt throw 80, and ive never seen any of the others pitch, but i know lutovsky doesnt throw 80, wasnt he at the mandan camp and only hit like 78 tops?spoilers23 wrote:baseballlvr wrote:Maniaconthefloor wrote:1. Bishop Ryan (easy decision here)
2. Grafton (top pitcher is capable of shutting down anyone)
3. Lamoure (alot of talent. question: can they put it together)
4. Munich (made championship and didn't lose much)
5. Thompson (tradition)
6. Velva (again tradition)
7. FSHP (maybe a little higher but think Lamoure is too good in their region)
8. Dakota Prairie (like their talent level)
9. Steele (Two title game appearances in four years warrants inclusion)
10. Hatton-Northwood (question can they overcome Thompson)
I agree, but with Grafton, the top pitcher can't pitch every game, even though they still have Martinez (also a good pitcher) on the side, but they're only two guys. who else do they have?
martinez, jordan lutovsky, garet molde, and luke paulson all can hit low 80s with their fastballs. lutovsky is as good as anybody. paulson is one of the top lefties in the state. molde's got a good fastball with a lot of movement on it. we also have a solid closer in mike bartunek.
i believe jordan threw 79 each of the past two years at the mandan camp but i know for a fact he has thrown harder than that.
Took him deep twice in a game this summer.....but he's pretty good
ndfootball06 wrote:
the thing i like about lutovsky is the way he carries himself at the baseball field. watching harvey at the state tournament was not classy baseball. big shot doesnt tuck his shirt in and walks wherever he goes. lutovsky's got far better mechanics than lorenz and better off speed pitches. if lutovsky wants to go on to the next level i think he'll be a better pitcher because he'll pick up a lot of velocity in college.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests