3on3 wrote:After watching Enderlin and Kindred play it appears to me that the shorter Hurlburt is a better player than the taller one. Keller is hands down the best big man in Region 1. Kraft has a gold mine with his roster and it appears he is wasting it away. 6'-10" and 6'-8" on the same roster with kids that can play as sophomores in Class B is treasure trove. To each their own...
balla45 wrote:Is it undisciplined play or is it a style of play that you do not agree with? There are several ways to coach size.
balla45 wrote:I do not think it is a terrible thing to do various things to get the ball in the hands of your best player in multiple areas of the court. To each their own.
Run4Fun2009 wrote:Just cause a team doesn't play your style of basketball does not mean that it is the wrong style of basketball. If they are winning games then they must be doing something right.
balla45 wrote:6'8"-6'10" guys bringing the ball down the court and dribbling between their legs is fairly common if we go just one state to the east.
justplayalready wrote:balla45 wrote:6'8"-6'10" guys bringing the ball down the court and dribbling between their legs is fairly common if we go just one state to the east.
Or the next level for these kids...every year we talk about the next D1 player from class B. Plenty of kids that have the skill...very, very few that have the size.
Size wins out on prospects...I can't be the only one who watched NDSU/SDSU last night. anybody 6'7" or up are asked to do a lot of things all over the court...
maddog1971 wrote:Ok. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOweaKjN2dk
Go to 4.25 left in the 4th and tell me the block was a foul. If you watch any part of this game... that was never a foul the whole game. Sorry but that was getting up for a 10th grader at 6'2
justplayalready wrote:maddog1971 wrote:Ok. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOweaKjN2dk
Go to 4.25 left in the 4th and tell me the block was a foul. If you watch any part of this game... that was never a foul the whole game. Sorry but that was getting up for a 10th grader at 6'2
Cant really tell much from the angle...lol sorry. even slowed it down
his head was well into the net tho
I dont know anything about these two teams...but it looks like they were trying to keep 34 in white away from the basket on when on defense, I'd guess he'd cause some issues for offenses???
defensewinsgames wrote:My predictions for tonight's play-in games:
G1: #9 Milnor-North Sargent (6-14) @ #8 Maple Valley (11-9) by 7 to 10 points
G2: #13 Sargent Central (1-18) @ #4 Central Cass (13-7) by 20+
G3: #12 Wyndmere-Lidgerwood (4-15) @ #5 Oak Grove (9-11) by 15
G4: #10 Lisbon (8-12) @ #7 Tri-State (11-9) by 2 to 5 points
G5: #11 Hankinson (5-13) @ #6 Northern Cass (13-7) by 15+
The most interesting one to me is Lisbon and Tri-State. They played on the last game of the season and it was a very close game. I think this one will be similarly close. Often it comes down to who learned the most from the last game. I think Lisbon gets this one on the road (gut feeling). Milnor vs. Maple Valley could be interesting but I think Maple Valley handles business. I would be surprised if the other ones were competitive the whole game.
Run4Fun2009 wrote:defensewinsgames wrote:My predictions for tonight's play-in games:
G1: #9 Milnor-North Sargent (6-14) @ #8 Maple Valley (11-9) by 7 to 10 points
G2: #13 Sargent Central (1-18) @ #4 Central Cass (13-7) by 20+
G3: #12 Wyndmere-Lidgerwood (4-15) @ #5 Oak Grove (9-11) by 15
G4: #10 Lisbon (8-12) @ #7 Tri-State (11-9) by 2 to 5 points
G5: #11 Hankinson (5-13) @ #6 Northern Cass (13-7) by 15+
The most interesting one to me is Lisbon and Tri-State. They played on the last game of the season and it was a very close game. I think this one will be similarly close. Often it comes down to who learned the most from the last game. I think Lisbon gets this one on the road (gut feeling). Milnor vs. Maple Valley could be interesting but I think Maple Valley handles business. I would be surprised if the other ones were competitive the whole game.
No disagreements; Lisbon/Tri-State is in Rosholt which is a better gym then where final game was played (Fairmount). The 8/9 & 7/10 games should be very competitive. CC, OG & NC should have no problems with their matchups...slow starts could hinder them but depth will be key here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests