winners wrote:I find it hard to believe that North Star can have 4 all staters and finish second in their region, and the team that is number one in their region have 1 all stater. Also, a team that doesn't make the playoffs have 2 all staters.
winners wrote:I find it hard to believe that North Star can have 4 all staters and finish second in their region, and the team that is number one in their region have 1 all stater. Also, a team that doesn't make the playoffs have 2 all staters.
Spin2Win wrote:Does it really matter how the team finishes in the region or state? I thought the All State is about the individual.
Spin2Win wrote:Does it really matter how the team finishes in the region or state? I thought the All State is about the individual.
Spin2Win wrote:Does it really matter how the team finishes in the region or state? I thought the All State is about the individual.
winners wrote:I find it hard to believe that North Star can have 4 all staters and finish second in their region, and the team that is number one in their region have 1 all stater. Also, a team that doesn't make the playoffs have 2 all staters.
panthercub wrote:All State players should be players that you would want to represent our state vs lets say a SD team. Why would you take a kid from a good team that is a decent athelete over a kid from a sub par team that is a dominant player!? It is about indivuals not team performance. We have a playoff system to decide who the "better" teams are! BTW it looks like regions 2 and 3 have the power this year!winners wrote:I find it hard to believe that North Star can have 4 all staters and finish second in their region, and the team that is number one in their region have 1 all stater. Also, a team that doesn't make the playoffs have 2 all staters.
panthercub wrote:All State players should be players that you would want to represent our state vs lets say a SD team. Why would you take a kid from a good team that is a decent athelete over a kid from a sub par team that is a dominant player!? It is about indivuals not team performance. We have a playoff system to decide who the "better" teams are! BTW it looks like regions 2 and 3 have the power this year!winners wrote:I find it hard to believe that North Star can have 4 all staters and finish second in their region, and the team that is number one in their region have 1 all stater. Also, a team that doesn't make the playoffs have 2 all staters.
The Schwab wrote:I don't know if I would say power, we were 5 points away from having a split (Napoleon and CM lost by 5 combined) and we were 7 points away from Region 1 having 3 teams win (Napoleon and Lamoure lost by 7 combined) It seems like it was pretty balanced this year IMO
kiper wrote:Yet region two could have completed the sweep if injuries would not have effected the WL game
kiper wrote:Yet region two could have completed the sweep if injuries would not have effected the WL game
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests