teamramrod wrote:can you say the topic is about anyone touching south? clearly north can and wouldnt surprise me if red river or central beat them when they play again
bruins44 wrote:teamramrod wrote:can you say the topic is about anyone touching south? clearly north can and wouldnt surprise me if red river or central beat them when they play again
This topic started last year! not this year!
Yes there are a few teams that can beat South, its HS basketball, Did you know that 4 out of Souths 5 starters are underclassmen? 3 juniors and a soph in the starting lineup. 9-1 is pretty impressive at this stage if you ask me! North played their best game of the year shooting 50%. South shot 34% yet if South makes one of two freethrows with 5 seconds left they win, that should tell you somthing! South plays poor but still could have won! Teams will still have to play great to beat them. Getting that long EDC undefeated string off their backs will make them better.
football101 wrote:South lost to Devils Lake by 10 tonight.
Eminence wrote:They weren't deep last year either but they still won almost all of their games.
3Putt wrote:Eminence wrote:They weren't deep last year either but they still won almost all of their games.
IMO, if they had been a little deeper last year, they would have had a good chance to win all of their games. Did they play 6 or 7 in the championship game last year?
scoobyx2 wrote:3Putt wrote:Eminence wrote:They weren't deep last year either but they still won almost all of their games.
IMO, if they had been a little deeper last year, they would have had a good chance to win all of their games. Did they play 6 or 7 in the championship game last year?
They weren't necessarily deeper on the bench last year. They had 5 starters who were All-EDC players, and this year (and please correct me) they have 2. Also, the competion in the EDC last year was almost non-existent. Things are changing there too. Last year, South didn't face a full-court press until State (according to the sports broadcasters). They didn't really need a bench.
Baller wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:3Putt wrote:Eminence wrote:They weren't deep last year either but they still won almost all of their games.
IMO, if they had been a little deeper last year, they would have had a good chance to win all of their games. Did they play 6 or 7 in the championship game last year?
They weren't necessarily deeper on the bench last year. They had 5 starters who were All-EDC players, and this year (and please correct me) they have 2. Also, the competion in the EDC last year was almost non-existent. Things are changing there too. Last year, South didn't face a full-court press until State (according to the sports broadcasters). They didn't really need a bench.
5 starters that were all conference minus two seniors = 2 all conferences players. 2 that were all state and 1 that will probably join them this year. Last year they had 3 Division 1 athletes. This year they have 2 although 1 more has the potential to join them.
The difference is the energy level without haring...I truely didnt believe that she was going to leave that big of a void but she has. This team only has one senior that plays and I Meghan is their obvious leader. Losses in January are going to help this team come march. Adjustments will be made and South will be fine.
sportsguruguy wrote:Baller wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:3Putt wrote:Eminence wrote:They weren't deep last year either but they still won almost all of their games.
IMO, if they had been a little deeper last year, they would have had a good chance to win all of their games. Did they play 6 or 7 in the championship game last year?
They weren't necessarily deeper on the bench last year. They had 5 starters who were All-EDC players, and this year (and please correct me) they have 2. Also, the competion in the EDC last year was almost non-existent. Things are changing there too. Last year, South didn't face a full-court press until State (according to the sports broadcasters). They didn't really need a bench.
5 starters that were all conference minus two seniors = 2 all conferences players. 2 that were all state and 1 that will probably join them this year. Last year they had 3 Division 1 athletes. This year they have 2 although 1 more has the potential to join them.
The difference is the energy level without haring...I truely didnt believe that she was going to leave that big of a void but she has. This team only has one senior that plays and I Meghan is their obvious leader. Losses in January are going to help this team come march. Adjustments will be made and South will be fine.
I dont believe that haring had that big of an impact as you say. She was a very good high school athlete, no doubt about it, but IMO it all has to do with Katie Dockter this year. Coach F gave her alot of experience last year knowing that she was going to be a huge asset to his team this year. She came to the conclusion this year that she did not want to play as she wanted to save herself for track. IMO if coach f knew that I am sure he would have had more of his girls playing alot more varsity bball last year so they were deaper at the bench.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests