I don't really remember anything from 2000-2003
But I would say Minot 03-04 was the best that I can remember any thoughts/arguments?
Radiation_Roy wrote:04-05 minot hands down i think
hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
Saucesauer wrote:As i look at this, I personally think that the teams from 05-09 would NEVER be able to compete with the teams from 00-04 I think that there were a lot bigger names back than!!
the_truth_hurts wrote:Saucesauer wrote:As i look at this, I personally think that the teams from 05-09 would NEVER be able to compete with the teams from 00-04 I think that there were a lot bigger names back than!!
i agree with that kinda because there were alot of big names and good teams but you have to think back to what age you were back then.....those were the guys you looked up to and you might have thought they were alot better than they really were.
the_truth_hurts wrote:hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
do you mean 07-08 mandan? because the 06-07 mandan didnt make the wda
hckywst wrote:the_truth_hurts wrote:hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
do you mean 07-08 mandan? because the 06-07 mandan didnt make the wda
i ment 06-07 mandan
Radiation_Roy wrote:hckywst wrote:the_truth_hurts wrote:hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
do you mean 07-08 mandan? because the 06-07 mandan didnt make the wda
i ment 06-07 mandan
may i ask why? this topic is on the best teams from 2000 on, not the worst
hckywst wrote:the_truth_hurts wrote:hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
do you mean 07-08 mandan? because the 06-07 mandan didnt make the wda
i ment 06-07 mandan
hckywst wrote:Radiation_Roy wrote:hckywst wrote:the_truth_hurts wrote:hckywst wrote:06-07 mandan
do you mean 07-08 mandan? because the 06-07 mandan didnt make the wda
i ment 06-07 mandan
may i ask why? this topic is on the best teams from 2000 on, not the worst
You were on it "Radiation_Roy"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests