region1 football wrote:region 3 was stacey schaffer. bcn
nativegolfer wrote:Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?
fruit snack wrote:nativegolfer wrote:Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?
i think carlson deserved the award....i dont think ricky should be worring about not getting this award and start worring about how to get past DT
The Schwab wrote:i agree that smith should have got it....but come on now IA....in the words of aaronih......you guys have bigger fish to fry :)
Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?Â
Indians Alumni wrote:fruit snack wrote:nativegolfer wrote:Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?
i think carlson deserved the award....i dont think ricky should be worring about not getting this award and start worring about how to get past DT
Fruit Snack, tell me how a guy who's team was picked first in the region and finishes 3rd, should get a COY award? I am failing to see how his team progressed!!!
Anyone who knows BB knows L-M underacheived this year. And for that Carlson deserves COY? There's something on the tip of my tongue that I want to say but won't...... for now.fruit snack wrote:Indians Alumni wrote:fruit snack wrote:nativegolfer wrote:Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?
i think carlson deserved the award....i dont think ricky should be worring about not getting this award and start worring about how to get past DT
Fruit Snack, tell me how a guy who's team was picked first in the region and finishes 3rd, should get a COY award? I am failing to see how his team progressed!!!
IA....i dont have all the answers big guy, but it was voted on coaches, rons peers
nativegolfer wrote:Anyone who knows BB knows L-M underacheived this year. And for that Carlson deserves COY? There's something on the tip of my tongue that I want to say but won't...... for now.fruit snack wrote:Indians Alumni wrote:fruit snack wrote:nativegolfer wrote:Region 4 was Carlson. Once again Smith was overlooked. What does the guy have to do? Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing. 24-1 with a whole new team. 6-0 vs teams in regional finals. 1 point away from being undefeated. Can someone help me out on this one?
i think carlson deserved the award....i dont think ricky should be worring about not getting this award and start worring about how to get past DT
Fruit Snack, tell me how a guy who's team was picked first in the region and finishes 3rd, should get a COY award? I am failing to see how his team progressed!!!
IA....i dont have all the answers big guy, but it was voted on coaches, rons peers
seems to me the voters vote for coaches who lead "bad" teams to higher finishes than predicted. Instead of good coaches leading great teams. I think that is Smith's case.ndfan wrote:[user=227]nativegolfer[/user] wrote:Region 4 was Carlson.� Once again Smith was overlooked.� What does the guy have to do?� Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing.� 24-1 with a whole new team.� 6-0 vs teams in regional finals.� 1 point away from being undefeated.� Can someone help me out on this one?�
I know what ya mean on that... Coach Oksendahl up in Cavalier in baseball won like 7 or 8 straight region championships and three straight state championships and he didn't win region coach of the year tell his last season at Cavalier a couple years ago. I some times wonder what people are thinking when they vote.
OK and how does that apply to Carlson? By the way, Fw was picked to finish 3rd in D7 and 5th in R4.web17 wrote:seems to me the voters vote for coaches who lead "bad" teams to higher finishes than predicted. Instead of good coaches leading great teams. I think that is Smith's case.ndfan wrote:[user=227]nativegolfer[/user] wrote:Region 4 was Carlson.� Once again Smith was overlooked.� What does the guy have to do?� Rick's a good freind of mine and he doesn't care one way or the other but it's the principle of the whole thing.� 24-1 with a whole new team.� 6-0 vs teams in regional finals.� 1 point away from being undefeated.� Can someone help me out on this one?�
I know what ya mean on that... Coach Oksendahl up in Cavalier in baseball won like 7 or 8 straight region championships and three straight state championships and he didn't win region coach of the year tell his last season at Cavalier a couple years ago. I some times wonder what people are thinking when they vote.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests