Your daddy wrote:Not that it would change this bracket much, but region tourney winners should be seeded 1-4. If you had to play a play in game you shouldn't be seeded higher than a region tourney winner.
Your daddy wrote:Not that it would change this bracket much, but region tourney winners should be seeded 1-4. If you had to play a play in game you shouldn't be seeded higher than a region tourney winner.
Attack the Process wrote:Your daddy wrote:Not that it would change this bracket much, but region tourney winners should be seeded 1-4. If you had to play a play in game you shouldn't be seeded higher than a region tourney winner.
So what your saying is that the winner of the Summit League should be seeded higher than let's say Duke if they don't win the ACC?
Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
packers21 wrote:Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
They got a better record in the whites? It actually changes nothing if they are the 4 seed.
Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
The Schwab wrote:Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
Who are you seeding them over in the top 4? I agree with all 8 seeds.
Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
Sorenson23 wrote:State Class B Boys Basketball Tournament
@ Minot State University Dome
Thursday March 14th
G1 - (23-1) #2 Bowman County vs #7 Our Redeemer's (18-8)
G2 - (23-2) #3 Westhope-Newburg vs #6 Edgeley-Kulm-Montpelier (22-4)
G3 - (24-1) #1 North Star vs #8 LaMoure-L-M (16-10)
G4 - (23-3) #4 Bishop Ryan vs #5 Sargent County (19-6)
Friday March 15th
G5 -Our Redeemers
G6 - Bishop Ryan
G7 - Westhope-Newburg
G8 - North Star
Saturday March 16th
G9 - 7th - Lamoure-L-M
G10 - 5th - Bishop Ryan
G11 - 3rd - Bowman County
G12 - State B Champions - Westhope - Newburg
Your daddy wrote:Not that it would change this bracket much, but region tourney winners should be seeded 1-4. If you had to play a play in game you shouldn't be seeded higher than a region tourney winner.
Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
The Schwab wrote:Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
Who are you seeding them over in the top 4? I agree with all 8 seeds.
chief45 wrote:Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
Bishop Ryan is above Sargent County in every Statistical Category. And Ryan has a better Losses Resume than Sargent County. Lost to two statically better A Teams than Sargent did. Regardless like others have said it does not matter. All it affects is Jersey Color
maddog1971 wrote:So 2 Privates in Class B an 2 Privates in the State Class B tournament... and one of those teams lost 7 seniors..... We have a division for Private schools.... so play in that division and save your money from lawsuits and buys some new diapers.
My prayers are with Westhope/Newburg or Sargent County
Class B wrote:chief45 wrote:Your daddy wrote:Look at sargent county's losses. 2 class A schools, a class A SD school, and 3 region loses to top 10 teams. They won their region tourney, why should they get punished for a hard schedule and playing in a very competitive conference. Like I said it wouldn't change much, but I would have given them at least a 4seed.
Bishop Ryan is above Sargent County in every Statistical Category. And Ryan has a better Losses Resume than Sargent County. Lost to two statically better A Teams than Sargent did. Regardless like others have said it does not matter. All it affects is Jersey Color
I know 1, if not both, of BR's "A" losses were without Walz. He was hurt in the DLB game which caused him to miss a stretch during the season. BR looked like nothing more than an average Class B team during that stretch.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests