Bisonguy06 wrote:KISS = Keep It Simple, Stupid
If you want to make the football plan better, make it simpler.
Here's the plan. This could be made to fit into one tweet/280 characters.
----
AAA = Grades 7-10 male enrollment 450+
AA = Grades 7-10 male enrollment 150-449
A = Grades 7-10 male enrollment 75-149
9 man = Grades 7-10 male enrollment under 75
No enrollment multipliers, no QRF.
Co-op as needed.
You can opt up; you cannot opt down; you can opt out and plan an independent schedule.
---
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... rue&lsrp=1
Based on preliminary 2022 data, this plan would result in the following:
AAA (450+) = 14 teams, Balanced with 7 in the east and 7 in the west
Minot the largest; Fargo South the smallest (532)
AA (150-449) = 10 teams, one statewide division. Possible opt-up from Shanley.
Jamestown the largest (413); Central Cass the smallest (158). Horace lands here at 169 and growing rapidly
A (75-149) = 38 teams, Kindred being the largest, with potential to grow into AA.
9 man (under 75) = 42 teams; 6 currently play 6 man
---
The KISS plan is absolutely better than what we currently have in place.
Now, tell me where I have gone wrong.
Bisonguy06 wrote:It sounds like you’re in favor of some sort of rural/suburban/urban multiplier.
woodchuck10 wrote:You're both using inequality as an argument for equality. lol
classB4ever wrote:woodchuck10 wrote:You're both using inequality as an argument for equality. lol
Not exactly sure what this means. If you're stating larger rosters don't equate to better programs, then guess I'll have to disagree. My only input would be to attempt to create the best parity in whatever classifications are brought forth. This will increase participation and that should be the goal. Of course, easier said than done.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests