Run4Fun2009 wrote:REGION 3
Record (reg. Overall)
x Stanley-Powers Lake (6-0; 7-0)
Williams County (4-2; 4-4)
Watford City (4-2; 4-3)
Velva (3-3; 3-4)
Des Lacs-Burlington (3-3; 4-3)
Berthold-Our Redeemer's (3-3; 3-4)
Garrison-Max (1-5; 1-7)
New Town (0-6; 1-6)
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
Region 3
Watford City (4-2; 4-3) @ New Town (0-6; 1-6)
Williams County (4-2; 4-4) @ Stanley-Powers Lake (6-0; 7-0)
Des Lacs-Burlington (3-3; 4-3) @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's (3-3; 3-4)
Velva (3-3; 4-3) @ Garrison-Max (1-5; 1-7)
Scenario #1 - S-PL, Watford, B-OR & Velva win
Stanley-Powers Lake (7-0) receives #1 Seed
Watford City (5-2) receives #2 Seed
Velva (4-3) receives #3 Seed (2-0 vs. other 4-3 teams)
Berthold-Our Redeemer's (4-3) receives #4 Seed (def. Williams County 23-14)
Scenario #2 - S-PL, Watford, DL-B & Velva win
Stanley-Powers Lake (7-0) receives #1 Seed
Watford City (5-2) receives #2 Seed
Velva (4-3) receives #3 Seed (Best Point Differential vs. other 4-3 teams)
Williams County (4-3) receives #4 Seed (def. DL-B 22-20)
Scenario #3 - Williams Cty, Watford, B-OR & Velva win
Stanley-Powers Lake (6-1) receives #1 Seed
Williams County (5-2) receives #2 Seed (def. Watford City 28-26)
Watford City (5-2) receives #3 Seed
Velva (4-3) receives #4 Seed (def. Berthold-Our Redeemer's 44-22)
Scenario #4 - Williams Cty, Watford, DL-B & Velva win
Stanley-Powers Lake (6-1) receives #1 Seed
Williams County (5-2) receives #2 Seed (def. Watford City 28-26)
Watford City (5-2) receives #3 Seed
Des Lacs-Burlington (4-3) receives #4 Seed (def. Velva 12-6)
I noticed in the Minot Daily News' Sports Section yesterday there was a short article about the DLB @ Berthold-ORCS. The article said that DLB is the only team who controls their own destiny at this point. Later in the article it said that with a win, DLB would be in the playoffs....is this accurate? because I can't figure out a way for it to be true. The article also said that if Berthold-ORCS beats DLB, they would need Velva to lose to Garrison to make the playoffs? I've been looking at these scenarios for a while now and what the Minot paper had written in that article still doesn't make sense to me.
Anyone have any say on this, or a way to clear it up for me?