Indy5 wrote:In district 12, it really surprises me how the 5 and 6 seeds can get two players each but both the 3 and 4 each get one. I know there were more deserving players on those teams than some that made it.
bball15 wrote:I'm assuming that the teams are selected before the championship game, but it was rather interesting when DLB had 4 players and Berthold only had 2, after seeing the way Berthold dominated the whole game.
mags wrote:i agree there was a couple kids on the all distric team that wouldnt start on the top 3 teams in this distric. as im sure this happens in other districs as well. and yes i know every team gets a repusentative and i am not talking about those kids.
but anyhow hopefully this forums doesnt turn into bash session. congrats to yale for distric player of the year and interesting to see if him or mccloud win region player of the year in region 6. (i assume mccloud was distric 11 player of the year?)
leroybla wrote:Notice that District 2 only has 11 members to their all district team, though Matt Zimmerman was introduced as the 12th member and senior athlete of the year. Ben Sundquist clearly belongs on that all-district team. It must have been a clerical error.
ClassBEast wrote:Ben Sunquist got robbed. The # 1 team in the district, who is undefeated and just won the championship by 30+ points should get 3 players. However, Maple Valley, who choked against Kindred and ended up with the 3rd seed, is the only team to get 3 players. I don't care when it's voted on, Central Cass deserved THREE players. Doesn't make sense, but these district teams rarely do. I vote they do away with them altogether.
StraightShooter wrote:ClassBEast wrote:Ben Sunquist got robbed. The # 1 team in the district, who is undefeated and just won the championship by 30+ points should get 3 players. However, Maple Valley, who choked against Kindred and ended up with the 3rd seed, is the only team to get 3 players. I don't care when it's voted on, Central Cass deserved THREE players. Doesn't make sense, but these district teams rarely do. I vote they do away with them altogether.
Agreed on all acounts here. Absurd that Maple Valley got three players. Oak Grove goes undefeated last year and they get 4. Central Cass goes undefeated this year and gets 2. I also don't like how they try to represent every team for the all-district team. Pick the best 12 players in the district and be done with it. If two teams get a total of 8 of the 12 players, so be it. If those 8 are 8 of the top 12 players in the district, then they deserve it. The all-district team is almost becoming somewhat of a joke.
StraightShooter wrote:ClassBEast wrote:Ben Sunquist got robbed. The # 1 team in the district, who is undefeated and just won the championship by 30+ points should get 3 players. However, Maple Valley, who choked against Kindred and ended up with the 3rd seed, is the only team to get 3 players. I don't care when it's voted on, Central Cass deserved THREE players. Doesn't make sense, but these district teams rarely do. I vote they do away with them altogether.
Agreed on all acounts here. Absurd that Maple Valley got three players. Oak Grove goes undefeated last year and they get 4. Central Cass goes undefeated this year and gets 2. I also don't like how they try to represent every team for the all-district team. Pick the best 12 players in the district and be done with it. If two teams get a total of 8 of the 12 players, so be it. If those 8 are 8 of the top 12 players in the district, then they deserve it. The all-district team is almost becoming somewhat of a joke.
bisonfan11 wrote:The thing is that some coaches understand that the best need to be on the team....and others do not. Sadly, the ones who do not 'get it' are often the coaches of teams that finish perennially at the bottom of the standings.
In 5 years...no one except the individual remembers if the made the AD team...but we always remember which team made the state tournament.
Hardball wrote:Northern Cass would've had one, but their best player (Hill) was ineligible for the districts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests