Run4Fun2009 wrote:Thunder and Hawks are my hope for the NBA title matchup (probably won't happen)...really would love to see the Wolves make it...but I'd be happier if they just won enough to be in playoff contention this season.
ndfan wrote:Thoughts on Chris Paul trade being rejected to the Lakers??
Sportsrube wrote:I think the owner of the Cavaliers should spend more time trying to make his team better than trying to bring other teams down to his team's level. We have large markets vs small markets in every major pro sport - thats simply the way things are. Gilbert needs to quit whining about the Lakers, etc... and focus on the Cavaliers. I can see why Lebron didn't want to stay with Gilbert's organization.
winner-within wrote:I like this move by the Thunder.....It may take away from them slightly for a chance at the title this current season but they are young and with all the draft picks coming up they are the team of the future...
lets say after Lebron gets a couple more...![]()
ndlionsfan wrote:I think its a great move by the Thunder. Setting a precedent that they aren't going to tie up all their money in the "big three" like everyone else is doing. Lamb could turn into a great player, but at the very least be an exellent role player. Martin will do fine adding some scoring off the bench to fill the void left without Harden. The draft picks can be used to reload or trade for a need in the future. I think Harden is a very good player, but definitely not worth a max deal.
Flip wrote:winner-within wrote:I like this move by the Thunder.....It may take away from them slightly for a chance at the title this current season but they are young and with all the draft picks coming up they are the team of the future...
lets say after Lebron gets a couple more...![]()
James Harden is 23 how is not signing him a move for the future? and it hurts them way more than slightly in their chance for a title this season. Every laker fan in the country is laughing at OKC for this trade. If OKC really didn't want to pay him why not play out the season and do a sign and trade in the off season?ndlionsfan wrote:I think its a great move by the Thunder. Setting a precedent that they aren't going to tie up all their money in the "big three" like everyone else is doing. Lamb could turn into a great player, but at the very least be an exellent role player. Martin will do fine adding some scoring off the bench to fill the void left without Harden. The draft picks can be used to reload or trade for a need in the future. I think Harden is a very good player, but definitely not worth a max deal.
Why not have a big three? Those teams have had success.
Martin has one year left on his deal, hurt all the time, and has very little value IMO.
Harden is a top 3 SG in the league right now, in 2 years he could easily be the best there is no reason not to give him a max deal.
The Schwab wrote:I actually liked the deal for the thunder for this year, not just the future. I am not saying that Kevin Martin is better then or close to the same level as James Harden. BUT I feel that come playoff time if healthy Kevin Martin brings a much needed "Knock Down Shooter" that they will need to stop teams from helping so much in the lane on Westbrook and Durant. Kevin Martin when healthy has been one of the most efficient scorers in the NBA
packers21 wrote:I think they made a big mistake. I dont see them winning the west anymore this year w/o harden.
Return to Open Topics - Sports and other things
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests