footballchicken wrote:how about the fumbled punt by WL, but the refs made them replay down because they didnt know what happened??????
The Schwab wrote:
Wow is all I can say about that call, I'm glad it didn't play much of a factor in the final. I will let someone else give their opinion on it.
The Schwab wrote:winner-within wrote:The Schwab wrote:Way to let your true knowledge show....wow
I've been around Schwabby! university of Life
If that game is a 40 point game in favor of WL I will never ever post on this board again.
panthercub wrote:NGS 20 WL 14
The Schwab wrote:Napoleon punted, WL guy caught it at around the 5 never really had a good grasp on the ball, never called fair catch, Napoleon guy hit him hard knocking the ball completely out, back judge called him down by contact and spotted it at the 10 yardline which made no sense at all, Kelly really held his cool for napoleon and asked for an explanation. Refs huddled together, some obviously knew the call was blown, but back judge wouldn't come off his ruling so they decided to re-kick which I don't think was a legal option. Many times throughout the game the refs had to conference and one had to explain to another that he is supposed to count down (like in basketball) the last 5 seconds of the play clock.
I would just like to say I was very impressed with the WL following they had, the kids seemed like really good kids and the coaches seemed very good as well. A great game of football, but I have to question the quality of officials for a state semi-final game. Very impressed that Napoleon was able to win with one of their best players playing at about 50 percent.
imperials wrote:The Schwab wrote:Napoleon punted, WL guy caught it at around the 5 never really had a good grasp on the ball, never called fair catch, Napoleon guy hit him hard knocking the ball completely out, back judge called him down by contact and spotted it at the 10 yardline which made no sense at all, Kelly really held his cool for napoleon and asked for an explanation. Refs huddled together, some obviously knew the call was blown, but back judge wouldn't come off his ruling so they decided to re-kick which I don't think was a legal option. Many times throughout the game the refs had to conference and one had to explain to another that he is supposed to count down (like in basketball) the last 5 seconds of the play clock.
I would just like to say I was very impressed with the WL following they had, the kids seemed like really good kids and the coaches seemed very good as well. A great game of football, but I have to question the quality of officials for a state semi-final game. Very impressed that Napoleon was able to win with one of their best players playing at about 50 percent.
they called it an inadvertent whistle
The Schwab wrote:Napoleon punted, WL guy caught it at around the 5 never really had a good grasp on the ball, never called fair catch, Napoleon guy hit him hard knocking the ball completely out, back judge called him down by contact and spotted it at the 10 yardline which made no sense at all, Kelly really held his cool for napoleon and asked for an explanation. Refs huddled together, some obviously knew the call was blown, but back judge wouldn't come off his ruling so they decided to re-kick which I don't think was a legal option. Many times throughout the game the refs had to conference and one had to explain to another that he is supposed to count down (like in basketball) the last 5 seconds of the play clock.
I would just like to say I was very impressed with the WL following they had, the kids seemed like really good kids and the coaches seemed very good as well. A great game of football, but I have to question the quality of officials for a state semi-final game. Very impressed that Napoleon was able to win with one of their best players playing at about 50 percent.
crashdavis16 wrote:A "do over" is an option if they thought it was an inadvertent whistle...
vikingman wrote:I'm surprised no one has brought up the botched fake punt that gave a TD to Napoleon. Was that a called play, bad snap, ??? 4th and 18 from your own 12 seems like a high-risk play to try for a first down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests