Plus Wald is "nursing a bad wheel"ToddZeile wrote:I was at the last game between these two. Napoleon is at least 3 touchdowns better and here is why:
1) Napoleon is a wrestling town and WL basically takes the winter off.push
2) Top 3 players on each team are a push. Players 4-9, however, are much stronger for Napoleon. not even close, Illes, vasques, bell twice what nappy has, who would it be after SChartz and Wald?3) Jonah is twice the QB Bell is. Again, not even close, Bell is twice what Schartz is.
4) Napoleon beat WL on their own turf. If not for two turnovers deep in Warbird territory, they win by 30.Warbirds had nothing to really play for, now its for all the marbles
5) If it was a 3-on-3 basketball game, I'd take the Warbirds.True
6) If it was a fight, WL would be out before the end of the first round. Warbirds by 16
Napoleon in a laugher........
The Schwab wrote:If Napoleon is so bad why did they beat WL the last week of the season?
witherspoon wrote:The Schwab wrote:If Napoleon is so bad why did they beat WL the last week of the season?
Nobody ever said that Nappy was bad....W/L is just better.
imperials wrote:if you call playing for a region championship and home field for the playoffs not worth winning for, you are an idiot
wingnut wrote:It was said earlier on that W/L had nothing to play for...
Flip wrote:wingnut wrote:It was said earlier on that W/L had nothing to play for...
just saw that now. That is total garbage. As a team you want to win as many things as possible, including region championships. You probably don't put up region 1 runner up banners in your gym. I'm sure Napoleon takes a lot of pride in winning 7 straight region titles. Also, Wyndmere to Napoleon is not a short drive, neither is Wyndmere to Cavalier, I'm sure they would have much rather played at home than driving the extra 6-800 miles or w/e it is.
Flip wrote:imperials wrote:if you call playing for a region championship and home field for the playoffs not worth winning for, you are an idiot
I don't think anyone is suggesting that.
witherspoon wrote:Flip wrote:imperials wrote:if you call playing for a region championship and home field for the playoffs not worth winning for, you are an idiot
I don't think anyone is suggesting that.
Kids don't give a rip about that and you all know it, they were in the playoffs and at that time it is all that mattered, Coaches and AD's give a rip, kids don't, and if you don't beleive that you're an idiot.......
The Schwab wrote:winner-within wrote:The Schwab wrote:Way to let your true knowledge show....wow
I've been around Schwabby! university of Life
If that game is a 40 point game in favor of WL I will never ever post on this board again.
The Schwab wrote:witherspoon wrote:Flip wrote:imperials wrote:if you call playing for a region championship and home field for the playoffs not worth winning for, you are an idiot
I don't think anyone is suggesting that.
Kids don't give a rip about that and you all know it, they were in the playoffs and at that time it is all that mattered, Coaches and AD's give a rip, kids don't, and if you don't beleive that you're an idiot.......
If you don't care about winning a region title and the chance to host all playoff games until the dome you shouldn't be on the field.
shooter! wrote:The Schwab wrote:winner-within wrote:The Schwab wrote:Way to let your true knowledge show....wow
I've been around Schwabby! university of Life
If that game is a 40 point game in favor of WL I will never ever post on this board again.
hopefully WL wins by 40 then
witherspoon wrote:Kids don't give a rip about that and you all know it, they were in the playoffs and at that time it is all that mattered, Coaches and AD's give a rip, kids don't, and if you don't beleive that you're an idiot.......
winner-within wrote:in fact some Organizations would rather lose than win to get to the right bracket!
Play real good team at home or play average on the road
panthercub wrote:winner-within wrote:in fact some Organizations would rather lose than win to get to the right bracket!
Play real good team at home or play average on the road
Thats not how it works winner! If you win your region you play the other region's #4 seed if you take 2nd in your region you host the other's #3 seed! So ya see, if you win, you play a weaker team, you wise guy! Now, I hope WL wins by 40 also! And yes, witherspoon must be winners relative!![]()
panthercub wrote:winner-within wrote:in fact some Organizations would rather lose than win to get to the right bracket!
Play real good team at home or play average on the road
Thats not how it works winner! If you win your region you play the other region's #4 seed if you take 2nd in your region you host the other's #3 seed! So ya see, if you win, you play a weaker team, you wise guy! Now, I hope WL wins by 40 also! And yes, witherspoon must be winners relative!![]()
winner-within wrote:panthercub wrote:winner-within wrote:in fact some Organizations would rather lose than win to get to the right bracket!
Play real good team at home or play average on the road
Thats not how it works winner! If you win your region you play the other region's #4 seed if you take 2nd in your region you host the other's #3 seed! So ya see, if you win, you play a weaker team, you wise guy! Now, I hope WL wins by 40 also! And yes, witherspoon must be winners relative!![]()
Seeds dont mean Squat.....I've seen 4th seeds blow out #1 seeds.....its all timing there Babybear!! :wink:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests