ndfbfan70 wrote:kindred 2
carrington 0
PrepFBrules wrote:no such thing as a good hockey game,... boooooooring
ndsportsfan14 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:Of all the AA playoff matchups...Kindred has the least distance to travel. So that shouldn't hinder them at all.
Kindred 28
Carrington 23
Tell me what makes you think Carrington will lose, Just curious?
I just think Kindred will find a way to win...I've got nothing against Carrington. I just have a feeling Kindred will win
I think Carrington is to well coached, to fast, to physical for Kindred.
Carrington will be in their back field all night you can to my words for it.
There D is very good at stopping the run, and from what I heard Kindred can't pass. Just what I heard! They could be telling me wrong.
PrepFBrules wrote:no such thing as a good hockey game,... boooooooring
wolves65 wrote:Prep14 you serving pancakes for breakfast in the morning? Know the outcome of the game but not sure how it went but looks like you need to throw Kindred a bit of respect.
Run4Fun2009 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:Of all the AA playoff matchups...Kindred has the least distance to travel. So that shouldn't hinder them at all.
Kindred 28
Carrington 23
Tell me what makes you think Carrington will lose, Just curious?
I just think Kindred will find a way to win...I've got nothing against Carrington. I just have a feeling Kindred will win
I think Carrington is to well coached, to fast, to physical for Kindred.
Carrington will be in their back field all night you can to my words for it.
There D is very good at stopping the run, and from what I heard Kindred can't pass. Just what I heard! They could be telling me wrong.
Looks like I was right...but I didn't think Kindred would kill the Cardinals that badly. From what I heard...Carringon wasn't in their backfield much at all.
wolves65 wrote:Dance-not even a Kindred fan if you really want to know. I thought Carrington would win the game so I am a bit shocked at the outcome myself just thought Plankers deserved better than he was getting from "14".
Run4Fun2009 wrote:wolves65 wrote:Dance-not even a Kindred fan if you really want to know. I thought Carrington would win the game so I am a bit shocked at the outcome myself just thought Plankers deserved better than he was getting from "14".
I can agree to that...I know wolves is NOT a Kindred fan.
AND I do agree that ndsportsfan14 kind of had it coming after all his comments about Kindred being dismantled by Carrington.
With that said...Let's just discuss the game and not other's posts.
ndsportsfan14 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:wolves65 wrote:Dance-not even a Kindred fan if you really want to know. I thought Carrington would win the game so I am a bit shocked at the outcome myself just thought Plankers deserved better than he was getting from "14".
I can agree to that...I know wolves is NOT a Kindred fan.
AND I do agree that ndsportsfan14 kind of had it coming after all his comments about Kindred being dismantled by Carrington.
With that said...Let's just discuss the game and not other's posts.
I wag kidding about Jack. He is a beast on O line but not very impressive on D line you would think with his size he'd dominate both sides of the ball. But the two players that killed Carrington the most was #8 Austin Dahlgran (spelling) and there quarterback seemed like a heck of a athlete he had a very very great game on both sides of the ball.
Danceisntasport wrote:He's best as a power running back/fullback. He's nowhere near big enough to be a college lineman.
PrepFBrules wrote:Danceisntasport wrote:He's best as a power running back/fullback. He's nowhere near big enough to be a college lineman.
"Dance", I'm curious about your screen name. Was it the fact that none of the girls on your school's dance team would give you a date, or is it the lack of accomplishment in your own life that requires you minimize others? I don't follow competitive dance, but what I know is both Carrington and Kindred have strong programs, I'm guessing you're from one of the two towns. Before you defend yourself with your list of 'has-been' accomplishments, ask yourself this question: "How many future Division I athletes did I compete against while in Carrington/Kindred?" I'll answer it for you, none. So whatever titles or banners you won, get over yourself. Lastly, something to think about; golf, archery, bowling, table tennis, curling, NASCAR, etc, etc, etc are 'sports'. How athletic are these participants? I could go on and on, but I'm guessing I've already lost you, for others reading I hope you enjoyed!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests