meatball77 wrote:no dude, 6 turnovers.....6. not 5 not 4 not 3 not 2 not 1....6, give beau brown 3 less possessions he would of had prolly about 130-140 rushing and their fullback would of had about 65, and their other running back had 47yds, close to 100, joke not even half, were ever ur gettin ur stats or what game u watched i would be quiet because one guy agreed with me already, im guessing ur from north boarder...
TheTruth wrote:I guess my one stat was off, sorry my bad... all I am saying is the better team won... FSHP had 6 turnovers so they obviously couldn't have been that good.. and i am doubting they would have scored that much even if they didn't turn it over... they scored on one big play, so what happened to all those other drives where they didn't turn it over...........o yeah that's right North Border's defense shut em down, or did FSHP only get 7 possessions?
Indy5 wrote:meatball77 wrote:no dude, 6 turnovers.....6. not 5 not 4 not 3 not 2 not 1....6, give beau brown 3 less possessions he would of had prolly about 130-140 rushing and their fullback would of had about 65, and their other running back had 47yds, close to 100, joke not even half, were ever ur gettin ur stats or what game u watched i would be quiet because one guy agreed with me already, im guessing ur from north boarder...
Maybe they shouldn't have turned it over so much. That's kind of a big deal in big games. Good teams usually don't turn it over that much.
TheTruth wrote:from that game i watched of fshp they didn't impress me...when they didn't turn the ball over they still couldn't move the football...im not saying its going to be a blow out everytime, but i do think 9 out of 10 times North Border will win that game
meatball77 wrote:Indy5 wrote:meatball77 wrote:no dude, 6 turnovers.....6. not 5 not 4 not 3 not 2 not 1....6, give beau brown 3 less possessions he would of had prolly about 130-140 rushing and their fullback would of had about 65, and their other running back had 47yds, close to 100, joke not even half, were ever ur gettin ur stats or what game u watched i would be quiet because one guy agreed with me already, im guessing ur from north boarder...
Maybe they shouldn't have turned it over so much. That's kind of a big deal in big games. Good teams usually don't turn it over that much.
They were a good team considering they had only 13 kids playing that game, and turnovers will kill teams, it killed pitt in the super bowl, so i guess ur saying pittsburgh is a crappy team now too
meatball77 wrote:Dude no, fshp fumbled 3 times within the goal line, trust me i was there, im from there...U take away the 3 of the 5 turnovers it is a 14-22 fshp win, with the 3 within the 10 as scores for fshp and 3 possessions nb scored on it is a win...
TheTruth wrote:I really don't care about next year at all... i just think NB was the better team this year... they even proved it by going on and beating the seconded seeded team in your region... FSHP never proved to me in that game they could keep up with North Border....FSHP = lots of turnover and one touch down, NB = 1 turnover and lots of touchdowns... i don't see how you can argue against that
allsport137 wrote:Without fshp's turnovers yes it would have been closer but like he just said they couldnt stop our run game. TheTruth is right. We beat your two seed. But think of it this way...you get one chance and you blew it and we came to play. Stop worrying about what you can change and just shut your mouth.
Indy5 wrote:meatball77 wrote:Indy5 wrote:meatball77 wrote:no dude, 6 turnovers.....6. not 5 not 4 not 3 not 2 not 1....6, give beau brown 3 less possessions he would of had prolly about 130-140 rushing and their fullback would of had about 65, and their other running back had 47yds, close to 100, joke not even half, were ever ur gettin ur stats or what game u watched i would be quiet because one guy agreed with me already, im guessing ur from north boarder...
Maybe they shouldn't have turned it over so much. That's kind of a big deal in big games. Good teams usually don't turn it over that much.
They were a good team considering they had only 13 kids playing that game, and turnovers will kill teams, it killed pitt in the super bowl, so i guess ur saying pittsburgh is a crappy team now too
Obviously, Pittsburgh isn't a crappy team. There is no need to get so defensive about this. All I said was that they shouldn't have turned it over so much.
TheTruth wrote:meatball77 wrote:Dude no, fshp fumbled 3 times within the goal line, trust me i was there, im from there...U take away the 3 of the 5 turnovers it is a 14-22 fshp win, with the 3 within the 10 as scores for fshp and 3 possessions nb scored on it is a win...
^
That is the statement i didn't agree with... i do agree it would be a closer game, but i say NB would win basically every time these two teams play...their running game was doing really good and it wasn't even at full strength... Brett Dazel got a concussion before half time... Dylan Masloski was playing with a pulled quad... Beau Brown was the only fully healthy one
Sportguy24 wrote:Nb had a good team this year. There gonna be good next year again aren't they? And actually I think fshp only lost a couple seniors and I heard some of them can be replaced. So both these teams could maybe meet each other again?
meatball77 wrote:TheTruth wrote:I really don't care about next year at all... i just think NB was the better team this year... they even proved it by going on and beating the seconded seeded team in your region... FSHP never proved to me in that game they could keep up with North Border....FSHP = lots of turnover and one touch down, NB = 1 turnover and lots of touchdowns... i don't see how you can argue against that
Oh really, the top two teams in my region were hillsboro and wyndmere, they played each other and hillsboro was beat out by wyndmere and wyndmere was the 2nd team in our region and won the state championship 52-12
meatball77 wrote:TheTruth wrote:meatball77 wrote:Dude no, fshp fumbled 3 times within the goal line, trust me i was there, im from there...U take away the 3 of the 5 turnovers it is a 14-22 fshp win, with the 3 within the 10 as scores for fshp and 3 possessions nb scored on it is a win...
^
That is the statement i didn't agree with... i do agree it would be a closer game, but i say NB would win basically every time these two teams play...their running game was doing really good and it wasn't even at full strength... Brett Dazel got a concussion before half time... Dylan Masloski was playing with a pulled quad... Beau Brown was the only fully healthy one
FSHP's nose tackle was playing with a sprained ankle and turf toe and one of thier defensive ends was playing with a badly sprained ankle, then ya they should of ran the ball alot which they did, but them guys tried as hard as they could but were in serious pain all game
meatball77 wrote:Sportguy24 wrote:Nb had a good team this year. There gonna be good next year again aren't they? And actually I think fshp only lost a couple seniors and I heard some of them can be replaced. So both these teams could maybe meet each other again?
I hope they do i want a rematch
TheTruth wrote:meatball77 wrote:TheTruth wrote:I really don't care about next year at all... i just think NB was the better team this year... they even proved it by going on and beating the seconded seeded team in your region... FSHP never proved to me in that game they could keep up with North Border....FSHP = lots of turnover and one touch down, NB = 1 turnover and lots of touchdowns... i don't see how you can argue against that
Oh really, the top two teams in my region were hillsboro and wyndmere, they played each other and hillsboro was beat out by wyndmere and wyndmere was the 2nd team in our region and won the state championship 52-12
wow i thought FSHP was in region 1...that's my bad I didn't realize you were in region 2... i take back that statement about beating your number two seed...i apologize, but at least can admit when i was wrong......... take a hint meatball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests