madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
scoobyx2 wrote:madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
This is a good question, but I would think they would/should mostly look at a player's senior year. Generally, outstanding seniors have had great careers. If they are from strong programs, they may have played behind talented seniors in the past, and don't have big career numbers or be an established leader until their senior year.
madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
gobison#6 wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
This is a good question, but I would think they would/should mostly look at a player's senior year. Generally, outstanding seniors have had great careers. If they are from strong programs, they may have played behind talented seniors in the past, and don't have big career numbers or be an established leader until their senior year.
But then you have to look at past seasons for some of the girls too, if the get injured or are sick for most of the season. Mariah Smith in District 2 is a prime example. She won senior athlete even though she had surgery and missed part of the season. She was the most deserving senior and that is why she won.
rock83 wrote:Each coach in the districts vote. The rule is who do you think is most deserving of senior player of the year in the district and eventually the region. You can make up all kinds of rules and the coach will still vote for the person they want to.madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
madmomma wrote:rock83 wrote:Each coach in the districts vote. The rule is who do you think is most deserving of senior player of the year in the district and eventually the region. You can make up all kinds of rules and the coach will still vote for the person they want to.madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
That's the problems, its seems the rules change. Their should be no rules-just statistical. And as for when they say, what if there is a new coach and is unsure of previous years. Come on the statistics stay at the school with the athlete.
scoobyx2 wrote:gobison#6 wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
This is a good question, but I would think they would/should mostly look at a player's senior year. Generally, outstanding seniors have had great careers. If they are from strong programs, they may have played behind talented seniors in the past, and don't have big career numbers or be an established leader until their senior year.
But then you have to look at past seasons for some of the girls too, if the get injured or are sick for most of the season. Mariah Smith in District 2 is a prime example. She won senior athlete even though she had surgery and missed part of the season. She was the most deserving senior and that is why she won.
Correct me if I am wrong, but Smith missed only 1 District game her entire season (maybe even career), then unfortunately the 2 in the District tournament when voting was already completed by the coaches. There wasn't another player in the District who could even stop her even though she was the only threat on the floor. There were no favors done there. There were other seniors who could have received the award also, but they weren't overlooked by giving the award to Smith.
rock83 wrote:you cant go on stats they mean nothing at time. Just because a person averages more points rebounds etc that doesnt mean they are more deserving or a better player. Coaches usually go on work ethic, attitude and who is more of an impact player. Stats mean very little. Someone can average 20 points and 10 rebounds and not do as much for a team as a kid that averages 10 points and 5 rebounds.madmomma wrote:rock83 wrote:Each coach in the districts vote. The rule is who do you think is most deserving of senior player of the year in the district and eventually the region. You can make up all kinds of rules and the coach will still vote for the person they want to.madmomma wrote:Just wondering if it is required for all districts to follow the same guidelines for Senior Athlete. Do they go by all varsity years played or performance her senior year alone?
That's the problems, its seems the rules change. Their should be no rules-just statistical. And as for when they say, what if there is a new coach and is unsure of previous years. Come on the statistics stay at the school with the athlete.
scramblinfran wrote:Does anyone have a listing of all the players that won their District Senior Athlete award? Just curious.
District 9 - Allison Schick
District 10 - Crystal Dammen
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests