vballfan06 wrote:Richland doesn't have a whole lot---their skills are pretty limited. However, a kid that scores 29 and attracts a double and triple team every night is the real deal. Seems like she's in the 20-30 range every night. I think she's one of the best post players around, if not the best true post player in region 1.
However, if richland wants to compete, it's pretty obvious that someone else on that team needs to step up and score.
ndlionsfan wrote:At least they have good numbers then. There aren't many girls programs that have a c-squad anymore....basically unheard of up in my area.
ndlionsfan wrote:don't they have a JH team?
ClassBEast wrote:ndlionsfan wrote:At least they have good numbers then. There aren't many girls programs that have a c-squad anymore....basically unheard of up in my area.
Central Cass C-squad is made up of one 7th grader, one freshman and the rest are 8th graders, so we don't have the high school numbers either.
Ginsbach wrote:ClassBEast wrote:ndlionsfan wrote:At least they have good numbers then. There aren't many girls programs that have a c-squad anymore....basically unheard of up in my area.
Central Cass C-squad is made up of one 7th grader, one freshman and the rest are 8th graders, so we don't have the high school numbers either.
Numbers and participation are two completely different things.
As of 2006, Central Cass had 248 students in grades 9-12. Looking at the population growth of this area over the past 3 years, it's safe to say that the numbers have gone up since then.
Other region 1 schools in 2006?
Richland: 120
Maple Valley: 97
FCT: 38 + 39 = 77
Sargent Central: 87
Central Cass has 2 to 3 times the amount of students as some of these schools, and like I said, these are old numbers. Populations are falling in Fairmount, Forman, Buffalo, Abercrombie, etc. Especially compared to the growth in bedroom communities of FM like Mapleton and Casselton.
It would be more appropriate to say "participation is down", since the student numbers are more than high enough to support a C squad.
ndlionsfan wrote:That's the same everywhere....for some reason interest in girls bball is way down.
shoelace wrote:...Or perhaps the coach is a factor. I know of several parents upset because they feel their freshman daughters were forced to not go out because they were not as advanced as the other girls in their grade. I understand that some freshmen girls went out, but several that were signed up didn't end up going out. I understand the girls cannot be told to "not go out" but many girls, especially younger ones, can be quite timid and scared of an aggressive coach. I found it to be quite a disappointment of the small numbers Central Cass has in girls basketball for having such a great program. Perhaps a coach should also pay some attention to the future and not be so selfish and turn girls away from the sport.
shoelace wrote:I understand the girls cannot be told to "not go out" but many girls, especially younger ones, can be quite timid and scared of an aggressive coach. I found it to be quite a disappointment of the small numbers Central Cass has in girls basketball for having such a great program. Perhaps a coach should also pay some attention to the future and not be so selfish and turn girls away from the sport.
vballfan06 wrote:ok ok...oak grove has surprised me. I really think Holt the 8th grader is their best ball player. Skills...are not so good. But their coach gets alot out of what he has. It's fun when you see that.
ClassBEast wrote:Hankinson 52,
Lidgerwood-Wyndmere 48
H 14 26 38 52
LW 7 21 36 48
H: Geffre 18, Wahl 14, Titus 6, Pankow 5, L. Stein 4, B. Stein 2, Westphal 2.
LW: Fuka 15, Oster 12, Grumbo 8, Skroch 4, Muehlberg 4, Mauch 3, Aker 2.
What happened here? Did Hankinson just play really, really poorly? Central Cass beat Lidgerwood-Wyndmere 67 - 21 (yet we lost to Hankinson by 18). Did Hankinson just play really well against Central Cass and they're really not that good?
ClassBEast wrote:Hankinson 52,
Lidgerwood-Wyndmere 48
H 14 26 38 52
LW 7 21 36 48
H: Geffre 18, Wahl 14, Titus 6, Pankow 5, L. Stein 4, B. Stein 2, Westphal 2.
LW: Fuka 15, Oster 12, Grumbo 8, Skroch 4, Muehlberg 4, Mauch 3, Aker 2.
What happened here? Did Hankinson just play really, really poorly? Central Cass beat Lidgerwood-Wyndmere 67 - 21 (yet we lost to Hankinson by 18). Did Hankinson just play really well against Central Cass and they're really not that good?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests