Region5SportsFan wrote:(Note: Not a professional and I’m writing this from memory only, so forgive me if I miss an important detail or write a wrong name. Also, I didn't post this in the 'Region 5' post because that thread is just a bunch of players/fathers bickering at each other, so lets keep all that out of this thread please.)
Upsets abound in the region 5 tournament tonight at Mandan High School. I, for one, am happy that I wasn't able to post up my Region 5 Tournament preview (was waiting for an admin to confirm my account status) as I would have looked quite foolish had it been posted with my predictions.
Maybe it was just me, but did anyone doubt this whole 'refs for these games were selected based on demonstrated ability and yadda yadda yadda'? Several times through the night I saw a couple paying more attention to the people filtering in through the door than the game going on the court. I don't think they missed any calls because of it, but its a bit disconcerting. Maybe the 3 referee system makes them a bit more lax than usual. Otherwise, the officiating seemed relatively fair even if a lot of them are giving way too much leeway on obvious traveling violations.
Without further delay, let’s get to the breakdown:
GAME 1
(4)Center-Stanton Wildcats 42
def
(1)Washburn Cardinals 41
Probably the biggest shocker of the night, the Wildcats came out with a 7-0 run which set the tone for the entire game. The Cardinals were missing one of their starting seniors, Beckman, to what I'm told was an illness (if I'm mistaken here, please correct me) and the gap showed in the Cardinal defense. The Wildcats took advantage by feeding the ball into Hovey, driving into the lane at every opportunity and dominating the offensive glass.
Sloppy passing by the Cardinals racked up the turnovers when they could have been taking advantage of some abysmal shooting by the Wildcats in the second half (at one point, 3 airballs in a row). Probably the Cardinal's biggest problem all year resurfaced tonight when there was a complete reluctance to shoot the ball from the outside. The Wildcats obviously got that memo and stuffed the lane full so the post attack for the Cardinals was unable to adapt to the increased pressure.
The Cardinals had a chance to win it with 10 seconds left and went to their workhorse Samantha Schell, but as before they tried to get it into an overcrowded lane which resulted in a turnover.
MVP: Bailey Hanke's excellent guard play on both offense and defense sealed the win for the Wildcats.
After game thought: A very unfortunate turn of events for the Cardinals to have a starter out of the game. As a result they had less of a defensive presence and were missing out on some driving ability. In return, they had to use some unproven talent who would have otherwise not appeared in the game. The Wildcats, on the other hand, dominated the rebounding game in convincing fashion and showed that they know how to attack the hoop. The Cardinals were terrible from the charity stripe down the stretch as well.
GAME 2
(2)New Salem Lady Holsteins 46
def
(3)Turtle Lake Trojans 44
The Trojans had more tools on offense but it turned out that New Salem would use there’s just a bit more effectively in the end. Three point shooting was the name of the game for the Holsteins with 4 of their first 5 baskets being from behind the line. The game was an affair of back and forth with the Trojans using their superior size in the middle and the Holsteins using a superior medium and long game until the end of the game where Turtle Lake was forced to foul in an effort to make up points... which despite the typical outcome, actually worked. However, it seemed that the Trojan players didn't realize that they had tied the game and went for the foul again, putting New Salem back on the line to sink their free throws. In an equally confusing move, the Holsteins then fouled the Trojans and put THEM on the line with only seconds to go... however, it was not to be and New Salem pulled out the win.
MVP: Megan Toepke, New Salem's player to watch didn't disappoint.
After Game Thought: The breakdown in communication between the Trojan bench and players lost them the chance at sending the game into overtime as it seemed like none of the Trojan players on the floor realized that they had tied the game when they went for the foul (no, Turtle Lake doesn't practice the European 'control our own destiny' style). New Salem's three point shooting won the game for them, hands down. They knew that they couldn't compete with the size of the Trojans on the inside and adjusted accordingly with positive results.
GAME 3
(3)Grant County Coyotes 49
def
(2)Underwood Comets 47
In probably just as big of a shocker as Game 1, the Coyotes mounted a series of impressive comebacks against the Comets to pull off a well earned win. Underwood was up big from the start and by the end of the first half, it seemed like the Comets were going to cruse to an easy win. Strong performances by Dammen on the dribble drive and Horst on defense put the Comets up big. The Coyotes looked for answers for almost the entire half when they started to find an one in Iverson. Coming out in the second half, there was hardly a play where Iverson didn't get her hands on the ball at least once. Often times, the Coyotes completely bypassed the Comet full court press by launching it down to Iverson or Gifford on the other end.
Meanwhile, the offense for the Comets started to go flat but Auck, who had been something of a minor impact player during the season, started to pick up the slack for the Comets.
When it came down the stretch, the Coyotes continued their post offensive with a very effective high-low over the top entry game to which the Comets had few answers. Up by six points with just over a min to go in the game, Underwood gave up a series of turnovers which all lead to points on the other end and eventually gave Grant County the come from behind upset win.
MVP: Amber Iverson, amazing post play tonight.
After Game Thought: The help side failed the Comets tonight, there were just too many passes into Grant County's posts that went uncontested from both sides. The entire year, the Comets' game depended on the performance of Horst and tonight she didn't disappoint. However, once Grant County realized that Horst was their worst enemy they did their best to marginalize her by running their offense away from her and sticking someone in her face on offense in the second half and it ended up being just enough.
GAME 4
(1)Standing Rock Warriors 68
def
(4)Sheridan County Coyotes 50
In the game that saved my bracket predictions from being a totally borked mess, the would be Cinderella Coyotes couldn't match up against the might of the Rock. To be honest, they didn't stand much of a chance, the Warriors are an overplaying, highflying machine and the Coyotes didn't have the experience or the speed to counter that kind of play. The game started with 14 straight points by the Warriors and they didn't let up much for the rest of the half. Neilie Dockter, the Coyotes outside shooter, missed her first five 3-point attempts while the Coyotes seniors added points sporadically. At the half they Warriors had tripled up the Coyotes 36-12, at which point I and half the gym left the building.
MVP: The warrior's starting five were suffocating tonight, hard to choose just one.
After Game Thought: In my preview (that I never got to post) I said that the only chance that the Coyotes had was if the Warriors went ice cold and Dockter caught fire from the outside as she did in the district tournament. It didn't happen on either account. The Warriors are impressive, that’s for sure but they aren't unbeatable by any means. However, I don't think that after tonight there are any teams left that can do what it takes to stop them... which would include slowing the game down and exploiting their over-playing. Someone must have come alive for the Coyotes in the second half because they scored 38 points, but probably on the warrior's 3rd string.
Advice for the teams going home:
Washburn needs shooters, in a bad way. In football the running game opens up the passing game and in basketball the outside game opens up the inside game. You can't consistently win with just one and that's what the Cardinals attempted tonight. The outlook for the Cardinals looks decent but they lose 3 big contributors that will need to be replaced, look to their current sophomores to step into more well-defined roles than what they were in this year. A second year under their current coach will also greatly improve team chemistry. Expect them back in the mix in 2 years, if not next year.
Turtle Lake needs to work on their inside game. On all accounts they should be dominating people on the inside with 3 players that are tall enough to make a big impact... they make a good show if it, but they don't do it consistently enough. Establishing a good 2 post high-low game would go a long way (however, it seems that many coaches have a hard time teaching this effectively) and would be complimented by their improving shooters that made strides this year. A huge plus, they dont lose any players to graduation this year, look for Turtle Lake to be a force next year if they improve their ball-handling.
Underwood gets hit hard by graduation; the biggest hit is the loss of Kayla Horst probably their best defensive weapon and 3 point shooter. Underclassmen will have to step up big to fill the voids. Auck, who is pushing 6’+ started to show a lot of promise near the end of the year, and will only get better with age (as is the way with tall kids), she does need to develop post moves, however. Dammen needs to have a basketball in her left hand all summer.
Sheridan County is a wild-card. They lose 4 players to graduation, but move up 7 players to Senior status all of which have potential if they are willing to work for it. Dockter probably has the most room to make an impact if she can improve her shot. They most certainly need a crash course in defense if they are going to make it back to Regionals next year.
Final Words: Okay, this was a lot of typing! Just a few words to end this out. If someone wants to continue this beyond the first round, please be my guest, I will not be available to attend the games so I won't be able to do the next two rounds.
I have a small note on the Coaching I have seen here in Region 5 this year. I am glad to see that the age of shouting and yelling coaches is slowly dwindling down. All too often in the past decade have I witnessed coaches that have no qualms about shouting down their players when they are on the court or in the huddle. I read somewhere on here that someone thinks that this is because kids these days are too soft and can't take that kind of coach, but the truth is that kind of coaching is completely ineffectual and counter-productive. Morgan Wootten, the most successful high school basketball coach in history, believed screaming at your players from the bench and in the huddles only humiliates and embarrasses them and it has no place in coaching... and he's completely right. I seriously hope that this type of behavior from coaches continues to come to a close, especially in places where we don't see it (ie. in the locker room).
Finally, I am about sick of these "sportsmanship rules" that they are pushing harder and harder every year. Did anyone read the 'code of conduct' on the back of the program? It’s as if a group sat down and said, "Okay, how would basketball be in magical fuzzy feel-good world?". It’s just absurd that they are trying to do away with any sort of spontaneous display of emotion on all fronts. Allow me to write a revised version that isn't so preachy -- Rule 1: Respect all players, fans, coaches and officials. -- The end. That's all that needs to be said. That's Real Sportsmanship right there. Put it in big letters... BOLD it if you have to. I just saved all you big shots at the NDHSAA a whole lot of time.
Thank you for your time if you read this whole thing. If you enjoyed the breakdown, please let me know, I may do one for the boys Region 5 if I am able.
Region5SportsFan wrote:(Note: Not a professional and I’m writing this from memory only, so forgive me if I miss an important detail or write a wrong name. Also, I didn't post this in the 'Region 5' post because that thread is just a bunch of players/fathers bickering at each other, so lets keep all that out of this thread please.)
Upsets abound in the region 5 tournament tonight at Mandan High School. I, for one, am happy that I wasn't able to post up my Region 5 Tournament preview (was waiting for an admin to confirm my account status) as I would have looked quite foolish had it been posted with my predictions.
Maybe it was just me, but did anyone doubt this whole 'refs for these games were selected based on demonstrated ability and yadda yadda yadda'? Several times through the night I saw a couple paying more attention to the people filtering in through the door than the game going on the court. I don't think they missed any calls because of it, but its a bit disconcerting. Maybe the 3 referee system makes them a bit more lax than usual. Otherwise, the officiating seemed relatively fair even if a lot of them are giving way too much leeway on obvious traveling violations.
Without further delay, let’s get to the breakdown:
GAME 1
(4)Center-Stanton Wildcats 42
def
(1)Washburn Cardinals 41
Probably the biggest shocker of the night, the Wildcats came out with a 7-0 run which set the tone for the entire game. The Cardinals were missing one of their starting seniors, Beckman, to what I'm told was an illness (if I'm mistaken here, please correct me) and the gap showed in the Cardinal defense. The Wildcats took advantage by feeding the ball into Hovey, driving into the lane at every opportunity and dominating the offensive glass.
Sloppy passing by the Cardinals racked up the turnovers when they could have been taking advantage of some abysmal shooting by the Wildcats in the second half (at one point, 3 airballs in a row). Probably the Cardinal's biggest problem all year resurfaced tonight when there was a complete reluctance to shoot the ball from the outside. The Wildcats obviously got that memo and stuffed the lane full so the post attack for the Cardinals was unable to adapt to the increased pressure.
The Cardinals had a chance to win it with 10 seconds left and went to their workhorse Samantha Schell, but as before they tried to get it into an overcrowded lane which resulted in a turnover.
MVP: Bailey Hanke's excellent guard play on both offense and defense sealed the win for the Wildcats.
After game thought: A very unfortunate turn of events for the Cardinals to have a starter out of the game. As a result they had less of a defensive presence and were missing out on some driving ability. In return, they had to use some unproven talent who would have otherwise not appeared in the game. The Wildcats, on the other hand, dominated the rebounding game in convincing fashion and showed that they know how to attack the hoop. The Cardinals were terrible from the charity stripe down the stretch as well.
GAME 2
(2)New Salem Lady Holsteins 46
def
(3)Turtle Lake Trojans 44
The Trojans had more tools on offense but it turned out that New Salem would use there’s just a bit more effectively in the end. Three point shooting was the name of the game for the Holsteins with 4 of their first 5 baskets being from behind the line. The game was an affair of back and forth with the Trojans using their superior size in the middle and the Holsteins using a superior medium and long game until the end of the game where Turtle Lake was forced to foul in an effort to make up points... which despite the typical outcome, actually worked. However, it seemed that the Trojan players didn't realize that they had tied the game and went for the foul again, putting New Salem back on the line to sink their free throws. In an equally confusing move, the Holsteins then fouled the Trojans and put THEM on the line with only seconds to go... however, it was not to be and New Salem pulled out the win.
MVP: Megan Toepke, New Salem's player to watch didn't disappoint.
After Game Thought: The breakdown in communication between the Trojan bench and players lost them the chance at sending the game into overtime as it seemed like none of the Trojan players on the floor realized that they had tied the game when they went for the foul (no, Turtle Lake doesn't practice the European 'control our own destiny' style). New Salem's three point shooting won the game for them, hands down. They knew that they couldn't compete with the size of the Trojans on the inside and adjusted accordingly with positive results.
GAME 3
(3)Grant County Coyotes 49
def
(2)Underwood Comets 47
In probably just as big of a shocker as Game 1, the Coyotes mounted a series of impressive comebacks against the Comets to pull off a well earned win. Underwood was up big from the start and by the end of the first half, it seemed like the Comets were going to cruse to an easy win. Strong performances by Dammen on the dribble drive and Horst on defense put the Comets up big. The Coyotes looked for answers for almost the entire half when they started to find an one in Iverson. Coming out in the second half, there was hardly a play where Iverson didn't get her hands on the ball at least once. Often times, the Coyotes completely bypassed the Comet full court press by launching it down to Iverson or Gifford on the other end.
Meanwhile, the offense for the Comets started to go flat but Auck, who had been something of a minor impact player during the season, started to pick up the slack for the Comets.
When it came down the stretch, the Coyotes continued their post offensive with a very effective high-low over the top entry game to which the Comets had few answers. Up by six points with just over a min to go in the game, Underwood gave up a series of turnovers which all lead to points on the other end and eventually gave Grant County the come from behind upset win.
MVP: Amber Iverson, amazing post play tonight.
After Game Thought: The help side failed the Comets tonight, there were just too many passes into Grant County's posts that went uncontested from both sides. The entire year, the Comets' game depended on the performance of Horst and tonight she didn't disappoint. However, once Grant County realized that Horst was their worst enemy they did their best to marginalize her by running their offense away from her and sticking someone in her face on offense in the second half and it ended up being just enough.
GAME 4
(1)Standing Rock Warriors 68
def
(4)Sheridan County Coyotes 50
In the game that saved my bracket predictions from being a totally borked mess, the would be Cinderella Coyotes couldn't match up against the might of the Rock. To be honest, they didn't stand much of a chance, the Warriors are an overplaying, highflying machine and the Coyotes didn't have the experience or the speed to counter that kind of play. The game started with 14 straight points by the Warriors and they didn't let up much for the rest of the half. Neilie Dockter, the Coyotes outside shooter, missed her first five 3-point attempts while the Coyotes seniors added points sporadically. At the half they Warriors had tripled up the Coyotes 36-12, at which point I and half the gym left the building.
MVP: The warrior's starting five were suffocating tonight, hard to choose just one.
After Game Thought: In my preview (that I never got to post) I said that the only chance that the Coyotes had was if the Warriors went ice cold and Dockter caught fire from the outside as she did in the district tournament. It didn't happen on either account. The Warriors are impressive, that’s for sure but they aren't unbeatable by any means. However, I don't think that after tonight there are any teams left that can do what it takes to stop them... which would include slowing the game down and exploiting their over-playing. Someone must have come alive for the Coyotes in the second half because they scored 38 points, but probably on the warrior's 3rd string.
Advice for the teams going home:
Washburn needs shooters, in a bad way. In football the running game opens up the passing game and in basketball the outside game opens up the inside game. You can't consistently win with just one and that's what the Cardinals attempted tonight. The outlook for the Cardinals looks decent but they lose 3 big contributors that will need to be replaced, look to their current sophomores to step into more well-defined roles than what they were in this year. A second year under their current coach will also greatly improve team chemistry. Expect them back in the mix in 2 years, if not next year.
Turtle Lake needs to work on their inside game. On all accounts they should be dominating people on the inside with 3 players that are tall enough to make a big impact... they make a good show if it, but they don't do it consistently enough. Establishing a good 2 post high-low game would go a long way (however, it seems that many coaches have a hard time teaching this effectively) and would be complimented by their improving shooters that made strides this year. A huge plus, they dont lose any players to graduation this year, look for Turtle Lake to be a force next year if they improve their ball-handling.
Underwood gets hit hard by graduation; the biggest hit is the loss of Kayla Horst probably their best defensive weapon and 3 point shooter. Underclassmen will have to step up big to fill the voids. Auck, who is pushing 6’+ started to show a lot of promise near the end of the year, and will only get better with age (as is the way with tall kids), she does need to develop post moves, however. Dammen needs to have a basketball in her left hand all summer.
Sheridan County is a wild-card. They lose 4 players to graduation, but move up 7 players to Senior status all of which have potential if they are willing to work for it. Dockter probably has the most room to make an impact if she can improve her shot. They most certainly need a crash course in defense if they are going to make it back to Regionals next year.
Final Words: Okay, this was a lot of typing! Just a few words to end this out. If someone wants to continue this beyond the first round, please be my guest, I will not be available to attend the games so I won't be able to do the next two rounds.
I have a small note on the Coaching I have seen here in Region 5 this year. I am glad to see that the age of shouting and yelling coaches is slowly dwindling down. All too often in the past decade have I witnessed coaches that have no qualms about shouting down their players when they are on the court or in the huddle. I read somewhere on here that someone thinks that this is because kids these days are too soft and can't take that kind of coach, but the truth is that kind of coaching is completely ineffectual and counter-productive. Morgan Wootten, the most successful high school basketball coach in history, believed screaming at your players from the bench and in the huddles only humiliates and embarrasses them and it has no place in coaching... and he's completely right. I seriously hope that this type of behavior from coaches continues to come to a close, especially in places where we don't see it (ie. in the locker room).
Finally, I am about sick of these "sportsmanship rules" that they are pushing harder and harder every year. Did anyone read the 'code of conduct' on the back of the program? It’s as if a group sat down and said, "Okay, how would basketball be in magical fuzzy feel-good world?". It’s just absurd that they are trying to do away with any sort of spontaneous display of emotion on all fronts. Allow me to write a revised version that isn't so preachy -- Rule 1: Respect all players, fans, coaches and officials. -- The end. That's all that needs to be said. That's Real Sportsmanship right there. Put it in big letters... BOLD it if you have to. I just saved all you big shots at the NDHSAA a whole lot of time.
Thank you for your time if you read this whole thing. If you enjoyed the breakdown, please let me know, I may do one for the boys Region 5 if I am able.
oneshot wrote:Region5sportsfan...nice analogy...one correction in the tl-m vs. new salem game...yes, tl-m fouled with the game tied, 10 sec or so left in the game,(it seemed intentionally...can't figure that one out) and put new salem on the line...however, new salem had a foul to give...tl-m did not go to the line at the end of the game...it was a good move by new salem to force another out of bounds play with 2.6 seconds left...props to the lady holsteins for hitting free throws down the stretch.
rock83 wrote:The cardinals shot very poorly tonight. But it wasnt the reluctance to shoot from outside that cost them the game. It was shooting from the outside when they had a 3 point lead with less then a minute to go in the game. If they would of held on to the ball the wildcats would have had to foul and the game could have been put on ice. Also losing beckman really hurt the cardinals overall attack. It is almost impossible for any team to lose one of their best players and stay in rhythm.
All the 3 officials stuff
Region5SportsFan wrote:In a change of plans, I WILL be at the Region 5 tournament games tonight and will be doing a similar report afterward. I made the mistake of making plans with a woman the day after her payday... I still have a lot to learn it would seem.
About chanting, I had the chance to sit behind a student section at one point in yesterday's contest and got to hear a discussion about what chants they were and weren't allowed to do. At one point, they decided against the famous 'Airball' chant because they didn't want to get in trouble. Another rejected chant included the 'Dribble Dribble Pass' chant. Basically anything directed at the other team is out of the question it would seem. Very disappointing as IMHO the atmosphere isn't the same without both sides chanting at the top of their lungs... speaking as a former player from way back, those game atmospheres were invigorating to say the least. I understand the need to keep vulgarity out of the crowd section (and everyone can recognize that well defined line), but this extreme I don't understand. I don't believe 'Start the Bus' would be allowed here.
Mastermind13 wrote:I don't think it was such a big comeback by Grant County as much as bad coaching or a lack of. Look what had transpired, up 15 to 4 after the first. Line up change which killed the rhythm and momentum.
23 to 18 at the half. Two of their starters, Longtin and Horst who is their biggest asset sitting on the bench in the fourth, while Dammen ( at least 12 turn-overs ) is still out there. "Wake up somebody"
My best player would be out there the whole game. Underwood up by 6 points with a little over a minute to play and the coach has them playing the press. "Give me a break". Any team could have come back with that kind of defense!!
You get back, play defense, take time off the clock and make the other team foul you. Even my Grandmother knows that. No picks or screens on the Underwood side to free up Horst for an open look at the hoop with 6 seconds left in the game. What a shame that was to have no pre plan drawn up for those kind of situations. We've scouted Underwood before. They have a lot of talent that got wasted. To bad Horst wasn't playing on our team where her talent would have been put to good use. What a Defense, Three point talented player. She would have been our triple threat.
Mastermind13 wrote:I don't think it was such a big comeback by Grant County as much as bad coaching or a lack of. Look what had transpired, up 15 to 4 after the first. Line up change which killed the rhythm and momentum.
23 to 18 at the half. Two of their starters, Longtin and Horst who is their biggest asset sitting on the bench in the fourth, while Dammen ( at least 12 turn-overs ) is still out there. "Wake up somebody"
My best player would be out there the whole game. Underwood up by 6 points with a little over a minute to play and the coach has them playing the press. "Give me a break". Any team could have come back with that kind of defense!!
You get back, play defense, take time off the clock and make the other team foul you. Even my Grandmother knows that. No picks or screens on the Underwood side to free up Horst for an open look at the hoop with 6 seconds left in the game. What a shame that was to have no pre plan drawn up for those kind of situations. We've scouted Underwood before. They have a lot of talent that got wasted. To bad Horst wasn't playing on our team where her talent would have been put to good use. What a Defense, Three point talented player. She would have been our triple threat.
rock83 wrote: Why run back and play defense. If you have the lead why not press them so it takes time off the clock. You dont have to foul or let them get by you when you press. If you can play half court defense without fouling, you can in the full court and take time off the clock as well.
bigpoppakdog wrote:Coaching a problem in Underwood? Would say no. I think every coach who loses a close game sits at home thinking about how they would have done things differently. A close loss brings out "ref's fault" and "coaches fault" excuses. Easier than blaming the "kids" for not getting it done.
bigpoppakdog wrote:leave it to you rock to call out another persons opinions. Just like you did mine on my credibility on Standing Rock being 20 points better than everybody else. So far, your credibility has been correct, what 0% so far. My opinions are generally correct, because they are formed from non-biased observations. Occasionally wrong, but overall pretty dang accurate. Coaching a problem in Underwood? Would say no. I think every coach who loses a close game sits at home thinking about how they would have done things differently. A close loss brings out "ref's fault" and "coaches fault" excuses. Easier than blaming the "kids" for not getting it done.
#6 seed in the district playing for a Region Championship is quite a story. Do they have enough firepower to win? Anything is possible. Standing Rock beat them by 50 a month ago, 4 a week ago, so anything is possible. They are going to have to play a slow methodical boring game and hope the high powered duo are off. If the Rock get's going early it's going to be tough because New Salem doesn't have the offensive fire power to keep up. How they handle the Rocks pressure will be their biggest key. Turnover problems and it will lights out. If they handle the press and are patient on offense that might lead to a frustrated Standing Rock team who will become too impatient to know what to do.
***Beach lost, so their goes my credibility. My 2nd prediction gone wrong in 3 years. Hopefully Hazen loses so I won't have lost my 3rd prediction(although I really hope they beat Trinity). Then I might as well throw in the towel and let the newbies take over.
bigpoppakdog wrote:The two officials deal I think can be a negative impact. Especially when you match up officials that have never worked together before. I think 3 officials for girls bb might not be needed compared to the faster paced boy's game.
My prediction about the rock came from observations. Doesn't take an expert to compare talent levels. Rock has more talent. Again, you and your other district supporters continued to argue how good your teams were(they were, good records) and when one beat the other it was due to "refs" and now you were swept out of the region play it was about "refs" and injuries and illness etc... No need for any more excuses, it's old. At least cometdad took it in stride. I don't take these forums very seriously at all either. It's fun to debate things, like we did. But, when one person predicts something correctly(especially months ago..not a bandwagon predictor) you would acknowledge it a little.
New Salem can't press anybody, and the Rock doesn't press to slow a team down. Nobody in the region that out runs them. The Rock will press to cause turnovers and easy baskets and get this into a 60 or 70 point area. A score that new salem cannot get to. If the score is in the 40's or very low 50's new salem will be right there.
Hunterlaf wrote:i think that standing rock wins the whole region!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests