EastGuruWannabe wrote:OK - here's my humble opinion - the top players in Class B are pretty much the same caliber as the top players in Class A, with an exception every couple years, for example Jessica Kielpinski this year or say Katie Lorenz a few years ago for the B's. Thats why the All-Star games are usually pretty competitive. However, it is the depth of the Class A schools that would make it nearly impossible for the B's to compete year in and year out. Players 6-9 on most Class A schools would most likely be starters for the B's. Yes, if a B team had a stud or 2 the games would be close, but eventually the depth of the A's would wear her out. So it isn't that the best B players aren't as good as the best A players, its just that the A's overall teams are generally better than the B's.
ive played games and just had talks with kids from class A schools who basically think they are jsut better at life then kids from class B. they think that just because they are Class A they are on a whole different level, not just sports too. thats what gets to me the most is when they say stuff like that