steve34 wrote:Class B basketball isn't good enough to make us hold on to an outdated system. Perhaps at one time it was the best thing going, but it's losing a ton of momentum to football and Class A basketball.
steve34 wrote:The receipts from the gate would prove otherwise.
steve34 wrote:Yeah, and there's a reason why the post above asked for 15 years. It's just like a moderator with his head in the Class B clouds to find numbers that support his myth, and then take them out of context.
Oh, and I'd like to see how much of that revenue was actually related to basketball. Does every parent with a child in the parade of champions get a free ticket, or are they paying at the door. I'm guessing it's the latter. So, as I mentioned before, keep pumping up your numbers with all the pomp and circumstance of every past, present, and future champion, and make the B less about basketball and more about everyone patting themselves on the back.
Not to mention that there were nine teams in last year's Elite 8.
07ndgolfer wrote:So are you trying to say that if the parade of champions was held during the class A tourney that it would make up for the $70,000+ difference there was last year just from the ticket sales of those parents who just watch the parade of champions???...I don't think so... And for the percentage of increase from 2008 to 2009 for the B, in 2008 it was held in Fargo and 2009 was in Minot. And for the huge percentage decrease from 08 to 09 for the A, in 2008 it was held in Bismarck and 2009 was in Fargo... If Fargo does such an excellent job of hosting tournaments compared to Minot and Bismarck why can't their numbers even compare???
steve34 wrote:The receipts from the gate would prove otherwise.
steve34 wrote:I said Fargo does a fine job of hosting tournaments, not attending them. None of the complaints about the tournament being in Fargo have ever been about attendance. It's always about facilities, and facilities are not a problem in Fargo.
Bismarck and Minot obviously do a better job of attending the tournaments. So, if you want to blame it on Fargo, then lets get some Minot to Minot and Bismarck to Bismarck comparisons going. There's a reason why administrators all agree that the luster is wearing off the B.
Also, would someone please post the field of teams in the Elite 8 in 2008. I'm aware of the field in 2009. It's awfully nice to have the following:
North Star--5 or 6 towns strung together.
Dakota Prairie--5 or 6 towns strung together.
Bowman County--enough said.
Linton--sorry, but there's no denying the impact that five players from other school districts had
So, lets compare fields for a bit. And I"m not trying to make a point, because I, for the life of me, cannot remember the field from 2008.
steve34 wrote:I spend time on the Class B forum because of the fraud that keeps our state from moving forward with three classes of basketball. The myths generated around the Class B game hold the state back big time, and someone has to challenge these myths with the truth.
No one is arguing against the fact that, for the last three years, the receipts from the Class B boys Elite 8 have been steadily dropping. Even the old-tymers, the ones who buy into the myths hook, line, and sinker, are seeing through the smoke-screen that is Class B basketball. The "grand daddy" is losing steam, and a change is necessary to refresh basketball around the state.
Class B basketball isn't good enough to make us hold on to an outdated system. Perhaps at one time it was the best thing going, but it's losing a ton of momentum to football and Class A basketball. A ball isn't gaining ground because of new-found interest from former B players moving into A towns. Two words--shot clock. The game actually moves around a little bit and you actually have to keep playing after you take the big lead. I saw a game this weekend where a team stalled for 1:15 for the final shot, then called a timeout with 6 seconds left. They won in overtime, not in regulation. This is why B basketball pretty much fails in any comparison to the A game, or any other game.
classB4ever wrote:
R1 - Lisbon vs. North Sargent. Not sure. Would guess about a wash.
R2 - Grafton vs. Dakota Prairie. Don't think that one is close.
R3 - Lamoure vs. Linton. Nod to Linton but not by much?
R4 - Four Winds vs. North Star (3 towns). Four Winds.
R5 - TLM. Same both years.
R6 - Minot Bishop Ryan vs. Berthold. Have to give it to Ryan.
R7 - Mott/Regent vs. Bowman County. Not sure. Would guess about a wash.
R8 - Watford City. Same both years.
I am not positive, but I am guessing that the population base would have been down for 2009 vs. 2008.
steve34 wrote:Very few class B fans are open-minded, so keep going with that. Myth number 12 or so.
I'm working on obtaining the gate receipts for the last 15 years, as was asked for in this thread. This cannot be accomplished in 15 minutes. E-mails have been sent.
You can't debunk the myths period. Keep trying, but you can't do it. That's why the thread is 15 pages. It's 15 pages because you cling to the myths so hard you could choke them. They are all you have to make Class B basketball relevant.
Once the numbers are available, you'll see the receipts have fallen. The field from last year to two years ago? Really. Linton is a nod but not by much over LaMoure? Rediculous. Way more, way bigger, considering that Linton's 25th anniversary team was acknowleged this year. Bowman Co. and Mott-Regent a wash? Rediculous. Bowman County's bringing a truckload more fans. North Star brings less than Four Winds? You're out of your mind. That's five regions where the population was either the same or more. Sure, Grafton would typically bring more than DP, but Grafton's hockey base could care less about basketball, so your population is divided. Same with North Sargent and Lisbon. Lisbon's wrestling crowd is substantial, and they ain't trucking to Minot. Two schools in Region I and II that have one winter sport, compared with schools that have two (in Grafton's case, three now). That's seven of your regions. You get Berthold, I guess. The rest go to a bigger turnout based on field.
Bisonguy06 wrote:You say that these "myths" prevent us from moving forward with a three class plan? Baloney. A move to three classes is a move backwards to the 1950s and 60s when we had 200+ high schools in this state. It's backwards to think that we should be adding classes when we are losing students and schools.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests