ugottaearnit wrote:Do you the fans enjoy watching games where "keep away" is played for the entire forth quarter? Do you the fans enjoy watching teams that play a "keep away" style (coaches call it ball control) throughout the entire game!!!! How exciting is it to watch offensive possessions that last the better part of a minute..if not longer...Not because open shots are not available to be taken, not that the other teams defense is that tough, but that the real reason for this style of play is that the teams head coach knows that the only way to make up for his teams inferior athleticism (which is what the “PRO” argument for this strategy ultimately comes down to) is to chew up as much clock as possible....Thus, limiting the opponents possessions. Controlling your players like robots may do something for a coach’s ego and career win column....i guess this can be considered a "shot" at some of those coaches (we all know who they are) who are listed in the discussion “Best Coach In Class B Boys Basketball” because that’s exactly what they do. If you want to know their true skills as a coach, wait until a shot clock is implemented.
One guy I had this discussion with said to me in an angry tone “well it’s no different from a pro football team that chooses a ball control offence!! “ Which, I did my best to explain that in all football there is a play clock to limit the amount of time a team can run off. A team simply cannot run the football and then allow for the game clock to run indiscriminately until they feel like running another play! Class A has had a shot clock for some years now, so why can't class B at least have it in the post season. Lets see some entertaining class B basketball again! Lets see some athletes go to state...instead of some robots!
mdk23 wrote:Exactly. When did basketball become a game where a team should only play offense? As long as I can remember, basketball has had two sides.... Offense and DEFENSE. And if the defense can't stop the offense, then I think the offense should be able to take as much time off the clock as they want.
gobison44 wrote:Class B does need a shot clock. When it's under 3 minutes and your down by 6 points, game is over. Not even to make the game more exciting for fans, but this is about the players and players learn how to battle it out in the final minutes of a game. They'll know, if they ever go on to college ball, what its like to manage a shot clock and possessions, etc.
scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:class b does need a shot clock badly!! the game just isn't the same without one! When a team holds the ball for a minute plus at the end of the game is just wrong!
The other team should either get the steal or commit a foul. No shot clock is necessary.
Tmagicstorm_22 wrote:scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:class b does need a shot clock badly!! the game just isn't the same without one! When a team holds the ball for a minute plus at the end of the game is just wrong!
The other team should either get the steal or commit a foul. No shot clock is necessary.
I agree.. class b does not need a shot clock..most teams don't abuse not having a shot-clock..although there are a few like dickinson trinity but it's not that big of an issue
mdk23 wrote:I was looking for the kind of words to use to describe how much I disagree with you. I found an article that says what it is I wanted to say except maybe in nicer terms. The article also covers a few other points about high school basketball. I suggest you read it. Here's the URL...
http://bangornews.com/news/t/sports.asp ... zoneid=501
The part I found interesting was that only 7 states have high school shot clocks... Hmm... That tells me right there that 86% of the country is currently not using them. That speaks for itself.
The Schwab wrote:ugottaearnit wrote:Do you the fans enjoy watching games where "keep away" is played for the entire forth quarter? Do you the fans enjoy watching teams that play a "keep away" style (coaches call it ball control) throughout the entire game!!!! How exciting is it to watch offensive possessions that last the better part of a minute..if not longer...Not because open shots are not available to be taken, not that the other teams defense is that tough, but that the real reason for this style of play is that the teams head coach knows that the only way to make up for his teams inferior athleticism (which is what the “PRO” argument for this strategy ultimately comes down to) is to chew up as much clock as possible....Thus, limiting the opponents possessions. Controlling your players like robots may do something for a coach’s ego and career win column....i guess this can be considered a "shot" at some of those coaches (we all know who they are) who are listed in the discussion “Best Coach In Class B Boys Basketball” because that’s exactly what they do. If you want to know their true skills as a coach, wait until a shot clock is implemented.
One guy I had this discussion with said to me in an angry tone “well it’s no different from a pro football team that chooses a ball control offence!! “ Which, I did my best to explain that in all football there is a play clock to limit the amount of time a team can run off. A team simply cannot run the football and then allow for the game clock to run indiscriminately until they feel like running another play! Class A has had a shot clock for some years now, so why can't class B at least have it in the post season. Lets see some entertaining class B basketball again! Lets see some athletes go to state...instead of some robots!
So Your basically saying that all the coaches mentioned in the "Best Coaches" topic wouldn't win if there was a shot clock?....GOOD ONE.....or better yet....are you just taking a shot at dave nelson.....get a few more than two posts on here before you start calling out some of the best coaches in the state.
ugottaearnit wrote:The Schwab wrote:ugottaearnit wrote:Do you the fans enjoy watching games where "keep away" is played for the entire forth quarter? Do you the fans enjoy watching teams that play a "keep away" style (coaches call it ball control) throughout the entire game!!!! How exciting is it to watch offensive possessions that last the better part of a minute..if not longer...Not because open shots are not available to be taken, not that the other teams defense is that tough, but that the real reason for this style of play is that the teams head coach knows that the only way to make up for his teams inferior athleticism (which is what the “PRO” argument for this strategy ultimately comes down to) is to chew up as much clock as possible....Thus, limiting the opponents possessions. Controlling your players like robots may do something for a coach’s ego and career win column....i guess this can be considered a "shot" at some of those coaches (we all know who they are) who are listed in the discussion “Best Coach In Class B Boys Basketball” because that’s exactly what they do. If you want to know their true skills as a coach, wait until a shot clock is implemented.
One guy I had this discussion with said to me in an angry tone “well it’s no different from a pro football team that chooses a ball control offence!! “ Which, I did my best to explain that in all football there is a play clock to limit the amount of time a team can run off. A team simply cannot run the football and then allow for the game clock to run indiscriminately until they feel like running another play! Class A has had a shot clock for some years now, so why can't class B at least have it in the post season. Lets see some entertaining class B basketball again! Lets see some athletes go to state...instead of some robots!
So Your basically saying that all the coaches mentioned in the "Best Coaches" topic wouldn't win if there was a shot clock?....GOOD ONE.....or better yet....are you just taking a shot at dave nelson.....get a few more than two posts on here before you start calling out some of the best coaches in the state.
being a rookie to your blog weakens my arguement?? as for the the head coach of MPCG, i wonder what you think about all those district and regional games that were played at Mayville State college. i suppose that wouldn't help out a little bit in the postseason. I wonder if the local kids ever attended open gyms on campus? not like that could be any advantage
ugottaearnit wrote:mdk23 wrote:I was looking for the kind of words to use to describe how much I disagree with you. I found an article that says what it is I wanted to say except maybe in nicer terms. The article also covers a few other points about high school basketball. I suggest you read it. Here's the URL...
http://bangornews.com/news/t/sports.asp ... zoneid=501
The part I found interesting was that only 7 states have high school shot clocks... Hmm... That tells me right there that 86% of the country is currently not using them. That speaks for itself.
I think that you need to read the readers comments to that article. I did, and i found this qoute that speaks for itself and adds more ammo to my side of the debate.
Rick of Bourne, MA - 01/09/08
Hi Ron, I used to coach against you when I was at Sumner High in the early 1990's. I never thought the shot clock would be a good idea but over the last 12 years of coaching in Ma. I can't imagine playing without one.I think it speeds up the game and lets the players decide the game not the coaches. It is also a reward for playing good defense. It reduces intentionally fouling players, to get the ball back to early in the game. We use a thirty and it does not come into play that often. I would like to see it extended to 40 seconds.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests