poweraidman wrote:Well we all know that this is going to be a major tossup for the number 3 and down seeds. Lamoure will #1 and Kulm will be #2 But who is next i really cant make a prediction any thoughts?
poweraidman wrote:i really dont think any other district team can beat them.
poweraidman wrote:ok then who is going to beat them? Besides kulm and lamoure, this district is really down for talent this year.
poweraidman wrote:ok 1st of all i have more than just kulm as my team, I just think kulm is underrated this year, and what do you mean bcn has as much talent as kulm? bcn has 2 above average sophmores, and that anderson kid who is decent. just to match them up, Kulm has Lindgren to match anderson(not even comparable), Knudson(who is better than both sophomors, but dont get me wrong bartlett and hienze are good players) and same with Anderson and Toay, Thats what i mean i dont think any other team has very much talent Lmm lost to central prarie, and then almost beat bcn, idk i just dont think any of those teams can contend with kulm and lamoure, thats just my opinion. But looking at teams i think bcn will probly be 3rd in the district, and lmm, or pbk 4, the rest is a tossup Edgeley beat ellendale tonight, and tappen well, they are tappen haha
poweraidman wrote:ok then who is going to beat them? Besides kulm and lamoure, this district is really down for talent this year.
Dr.Love wrote:poweraidman wrote:ok then who is going to beat them? Besides kulm and lamoure, this district is really down for talent this year.
Lamoure schould be 1 but after that it's anyones guess.With some real young players starting on most of these teams it will be who improves as the season goes on. I've seen some nice talent in this dist.and believe Kulm,BCN,LMM,PBK or any of the others could give Lamoure a battle.Remember last year Tappen gave them all they could handle 1st round dist.and we know what happened after that.
sportsguy2 wrote:Dr.Love wrote:poweraidman wrote:ok then who is going to beat them? Besides kulm and lamoure, this district is really down for talent this year.
Lamoure schould be 1 but after that it's anyones guess.With some real young players starting on most of these teams it will be who improves as the season goes on. I've seen some nice talent in this dist.and believe Kulm,BCN,LMM,PBK or any of the others could give Lamoure a battle.Remember last year Tappen gave them all they could handle 1st round dist.and we know what happened after that.
i dont know if they can give lamoure a battle...i think lamoure will pretty much walk through this year but if any team was to beat them i would give Linton the best chance...i dont think any team this year in district 5 will play them real tough unless shockman gets in foul trouble early in the game and he's doing a better job of staying on the floor this year compared to last year
basketballer wrote:LMM is one of those teams that will just improve as the season goes on, however from what i have seen this year in district 5 kulm is the best besides LaMoure.
poweraidman wrote:Now that kulm easily rolled past PBK and Tappen, does anyone think that they still wont be 2nd? Both PBK, and Tappen have the ability to be number 3.
Philnerius21 wrote:poweraidman wrote:Now that kulm easily rolled past PBK and Tappen, does anyone think that they still wont be 2nd? Both PBK, and Tappen have the ability to be number 3.
I'm confused poweraidman, before you said, "and tappen, well they are just tappen" or something in that manner. Now you say that they have ability to be 3rd? What exactly is tappen? Not saying you did say it, but if i remember right, i think u said that bcn and lmm should be third respectively. Did u have a change of heart for the tappen boys after friday? Looked to me like they had yur number till mittleider and the kapp kid got in some foul trouble early. Even with the Kapp kid playing only about 12-15 min he was able to hold lindgren to 4 points, while still giving up about 5 or 6 inches and 100 pounds. Lindgren was taken out of his game, i even watched him miss 2 or 3 little dumpers in the paint. Mittleider also looked like he knew what he needed to run early on yur D. He got hot with a couple lucky bounces of the ball on missed shots to him at three, but it seemed like everytime i heard him yell out a play they were either fouled or scoring buckets and when he could control the tempo of the game, such as getting to the hole when he wanted to or getting the ball down the floor and trying to make some happen. Not saying kulm is the only one hes done that to, it just that in the other games ive watched, he showed flashes of being able to read the D and call the rite offensive adjustment, just not as consistent. Now im not saying that Tappen is better than Kulm or that they are even the number 3 team in the district cuz after the stutsman games im not convinced tappen is quite ready. They still have alot to fix till tourney time. But but if yur gonna call Kulm the 2nd team in the district, they sure didnt show much on friday. But then again i guess "tappen is just tappen."
baseball wrote:Philnerius21 wrote:poweraidman wrote:Now that kulm easily rolled past PBK and Tappen, does anyone think that they still wont be 2nd? Both PBK, and Tappen have the ability to be number 3.
I'm confused poweraidman, before you said, "and tappen, well they are just tappen" or something in that manner. Now you say that they have ability to be 3rd? What exactly is tappen? Not saying you did say it, but if i remember right, i think u said that bcn and lmm should be third respectively. Did u have a change of heart for the tappen boys after friday? Looked to me like they had yur number till mittleider and the kapp kid got in some foul trouble early. Even with the Kapp kid playing only about 12-15 min he was able to hold lindgren to 4 points, while still giving up about 5 or 6 inches and 100 pounds. Lindgren was taken out of his game, i even watched him miss 2 or 3 little dumpers in the paint. Mittleider also looked like he knew what he needed to run early on yur D. He got hot with a couple lucky bounces of the ball on missed shots to him at three, but it seemed like everytime i heard him yell out a play they were either fouled or scoring buckets and when he could control the tempo of the game, such as getting to the hole when he wanted to or getting the ball down the floor and trying to make some happen. Not saying kulm is the only one hes done that to, it just that in the other games ive watched, he showed flashes of being able to read the D and call the rite offensive adjustment, just not as consistent. Now im not saying that Tappen is better than Kulm or that they are even the number 3 team in the district cuz after the stutsman games im not convinced tappen is quite ready. They still have alot to fix till tourney time. But but if yur gonna call Kulm the 2nd team in the district, they sure didnt show much on friday. But then again i guess "tappen is just tappen."
70-44.....?? they didnt show you anything? just because Lindgren had 4 points you think they had a bad game? i would say 70 points in a high school game is pretty good and holding the other team to 44, also pretty good. held you to 25.8% shooting on 16-62 from the field to go along with them shooting 49.1% on 28-57. only thing i can see from a box score that they could improve is their foul shooting going only 13-23 and three-point shooting 1-9. and to say Mittlieder got to the hole when he wanted might be a stretch....getting to the hole = getting the to line, and he didnt shoot 1 free throw so i have to disagree with him doing what he wanted. maybe they did get fouled or score buckets when they got in the lane, but judging by the 26% shooting and only 14 free throws tells me that it didnt happen all that much. out-rebounded you 44-33 and showed the ability to find the open man by seeing they had 17 assists on 28 made FGs. showed defense forcing 18 turnovers (11 steals) to go along with 5 blocks.
so my question is..what didnt they show you??
Philnerius21 wrote:baseball wrote:Philnerius21 wrote:poweraidman wrote:Now that kulm easily rolled past PBK and Tappen, does anyone think that they still wont be 2nd? Both PBK, and Tappen have the ability to be number 3.
I'm confused poweraidman, before you said, "and tappen, well they are just tappen" or something in that manner. Now you say that they have ability to be 3rd? What exactly is tappen? Not saying you did say it, but if i remember right, i think u said that bcn and lmm should be third respectively. Did u have a change of heart for the tappen boys after friday? Looked to me like they had yur number till mittleider and the kapp kid got in some foul trouble early. Even with the Kapp kid playing only about 12-15 min he was able to hold lindgren to 4 points, while still giving up about 5 or 6 inches and 100 pounds. Lindgren was taken out of his game, i even watched him miss 2 or 3 little dumpers in the paint. Mittleider also looked like he knew what he needed to run early on yur D. He got hot with a couple lucky bounces of the ball on missed shots to him at three, but it seemed like everytime i heard him yell out a play they were either fouled or scoring buckets and when he could control the tempo of the game, such as getting to the hole when he wanted to or getting the ball down the floor and trying to make some happen. Not saying kulm is the only one hes done that to, it just that in the other games ive watched, he showed flashes of being able to read the D and call the rite offensive adjustment, just not as consistent. Now im not saying that Tappen is better than Kulm or that they are even the number 3 team in the district cuz after the stutsman games im not convinced tappen is quite ready. They still have alot to fix till tourney time. But but if yur gonna call Kulm the 2nd team in the district, they sure didnt show much on friday. But then again i guess "tappen is just tappen."
70-44.....?? they didnt show you anything? just because Lindgren had 4 points you think they had a bad game? i would say 70 points in a high school game is pretty good and holding the other team to 44, also pretty good. held you to 25.8% shooting on 16-62 from the field to go along with them shooting 49.1% on 28-57. only thing i can see from a box score that they could improve is their foul shooting going only 13-23 and three-point shooting 1-9. and to say Mittlieder got to the hole when he wanted might be a stretch....getting to the hole = getting the to line, and he didnt shoot 1 free throw so i have to disagree with him doing what he wanted. maybe they did get fouled or score buckets when they got in the lane, but judging by the 26% shooting and only 14 free throws tells me that it didnt happen all that much. out-rebounded you 44-33 and showed the ability to find the open man by seeing they had 17 assists on 28 made FGs. showed defense forcing 18 turnovers (11 steals) to go along with 5 blocks.
so my question is..what didnt they show you??
Who says you have to go the line. Ever heard of penetrating, getting the heart of the D, forcing a double, and dishing, weakening the D? You said before final scores dont always tell the story. Did u listen to the game? The last 3 minutes tappen had 3 or 4 of their guys on the bench and Kulm got a majority of their steals and 3 point plays in the last 2-3 min to finish the game. Shooting percentage i can see, but what i can also see is two of their shooters on the bench in foul trouble for some bone head mistakes. My lindgren point, poweraidman before has said that lindgren couldnt be stopped by shockman, shockman did it and so did a kid half the size of lindgren. What kulm didnt show me was full intensity for 32 min. Their passes are slow on the perimeter, mittleider had 3 or 4 steals alone that he was able to run in front of. I didnt say they had a bad game just there is stuff they need to work on to be the number two team in the district.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests