ndsportsfan14 wrote:nadal11 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:well i personally don't think it should count on there overall record cause they had to at least give Tappen one good game of the yr! We will see why the played there JV against them on Thursday!!
hey it might be a close game right?? haha. yeah right huh
ha ha yeah no kidding I'm say LaMoure by 1 but a really good game
nadal11 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:nadal11 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:well i personally don't think it should count on there overall record cause they had to at least give Tappen one good game of the yr! We will see why the played there JV against them on Thursday!!
hey it might be a close game right?? haha. yeah right huh
ha ha yeah no kidding I'm say LaMoure by 1 but a really good game
lol, after 1 minute of the first quarter maybe.
ndsportsfan14 wrote:nadal11 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:nadal11 wrote:ndsportsfan14 wrote:well i personally don't think it should count on there overall record cause they had to at least give Tappen one good game of the yr! We will see why the played there JV against them on Thursday!!
hey it might be a close game right?? haha. yeah right huh
ha ha yeah no kidding I'm say LaMoure by 1 but a really good game
lol, after 1 minute of the first quarter maybe.
I'm say score 87- 35 if there lucky
bballuvr wrote:Basketballer is right. Linton and other schools have done this for years. It is wierd in a way I understand.
But, when you break it down, it is very clear. You can only play 19 games as a varsity, period. LaMoure, like many other teams over the years, was invited to play a team like Hazen in Bismarck. They accepted. They had to clear a game and happen to choose Tappen, because Tappen is in their last year of playing basketball. Tappen AD was contacted and said he understood. Yes, the risk was losing district points because you must play your district teams. Simple logic. Risky, but simple.
The LaMoure assistant told me they had turned down invitations to go to Bismarck a couple times in the last 3-4 years, and decided to grab it this year. Good move. He said they contacted NDHSAA to be sure and clarify the ins and outs. Even though its been done by others, he said they wanted to be sure to do it correctly.
No big deal. They CAN"T count it on their varsity schedule because it was NOT a vasity game because they CAN"T play more than 19 games.
scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:bballuvr wrote:Basketballer is right. Linton and other schools have done this for years. It is wierd in a way I understand.
But, when you break it down, it is very clear. You can only play 19 games as a varsity, period. LaMoure, like many other teams over the years, was invited to play a team like Hazen in Bismarck. They accepted. They had to clear a game and happen to choose Tappen, because Tappen is in their last year of playing basketball. Tappen AD was contacted and said he understood. Yes, the risk was losing district points because you must play your district teams. Simple logic. Risky, but simple.
The LaMoure assistant told me they had turned down invitations to go to Bismarck a couple times in the last 3-4 years, and decided to grab it this year. Good move. He said they contacted NDHSAA to be sure and clarify the ins and outs. Even though its been done by others, he said they wanted to be sure to do it correctly.
No big deal. They CAN"T count it on their varsity schedule because it was NOT a vasity game because they CAN"T play more than 19 games.
it should count on the overall record, if it counts as a district loss it counts as an overall loss, simple as that, the 19 gm shouldn't mater.
As I mentioned earlier, LaMoure does not get the district point(s) for that game. This isn't about district records; it's about district points.
scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:bballuvr wrote:Basketballer is right. Linton and other schools have done this for years. It is wierd in a way I understand.
But, when you break it down, it is very clear. You can only play 19 games as a varsity, period. LaMoure, like many other teams over the years, was invited to play a team like Hazen in Bismarck. They accepted. They had to clear a game and happen to choose Tappen, because Tappen is in their last year of playing basketball. Tappen AD was contacted and said he understood. Yes, the risk was losing district points because you must play your district teams. Simple logic. Risky, but simple.
The LaMoure assistant told me they had turned down invitations to go to Bismarck a couple times in the last 3-4 years, and decided to grab it this year. Good move. He said they contacted NDHSAA to be sure and clarify the ins and outs. Even though its been done by others, he said they wanted to be sure to do it correctly.
No big deal. They CAN"T count it on their varsity schedule because it was NOT a vasity game because they CAN"T play more than 19 games.
it should count on the overall record, if it counts as a district loss it counts as an overall loss, simple as that, the 19 gm shouldn't mater.
As I mentioned earlier, LaMoure does not get the district point(s) for that game. This isn't about district records; it's about district points.
aren't dist. tournaments paired by your district record, not by points...if its a tie you look at head to head.
Pairings are based on points.
baller01 wrote:I don't see why it is so hard to justify. Why would LaMoure want to send their varsity to Tappen, have the starters play maybe 10 minutes, and the JV play the rest anyways. It isn't going to cost them the #1 seed and even if it does, big deal. No matter what seed you are you have to go through all the teams anyways to win the district. It is smart coaching and completely legal. I don't even see why you guys think its wrong. It gives LaMoure a chance to play say Hazen instead of Tappen. Which game do you think is going to make LaMoure better? Exactly why LaMoure did it.
scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:nadal11 wrote:bballuvr wrote:Basketballer is right. Linton and other schools have done this for years. It is wierd in a way I understand.
But, when you break it down, it is very clear. You can only play 19 games as a varsity, period. LaMoure, like many other teams over the years, was invited to play a team like Hazen in Bismarck. They accepted. They had to clear a game and happen to choose Tappen, because Tappen is in their last year of playing basketball. Tappen AD was contacted and said he understood. Yes, the risk was losing district points because you must play your district teams. Simple logic. Risky, but simple.
The LaMoure assistant told me they had turned down invitations to go to Bismarck a couple times in the last 3-4 years, and decided to grab it this year. Good move. He said they contacted NDHSAA to be sure and clarify the ins and outs. Even though its been done by others, he said they wanted to be sure to do it correctly.
No big deal. They CAN"T count it on their varsity schedule because it was NOT a vasity game because they CAN"T play more than 19 games.
it should count on the overall record, if it counts as a district loss it counts as an overall loss, simple as that, the 19 gm shouldn't mater.
As I mentioned earlier, LaMoure does not get the district point(s) for that game. This isn't about district records; it's about district points.
aren't dist. tournaments paired by your district record, not by points...if its a tie you look at head to head.
Pairings are based on points.
how does the points system work then?
If each district game counts as one point, it's the same as district record. In some districts, some games are worth 2 points if the meeting occurs once, while other games are worth 1 point if they meet twice. It varies from district to district.
basketballer wrote:nadal11 wrote:basketballer wrote:ndlionsfan wrote:So when district standings are printed out, Lamoure will be something like 3-1 in the district but 9-0 overall?? Kinda messed up. I think that's a little risky basically giving up a district win to play in a nonconference tourney. That leaves the chance that Lamoure could lose the #1 seed in that district.
Everyone in the district has a loss. Except maybe Tappen, but i expect them to get one loss in the district at least. LaMoure had a chance to play a top 5 (2) team, and they took the opportunity. It helps them in the long run to know how to play an elite team.
tappen has 2 dist. losses, to bcn and steele i think.
K one to BCN, but I think everyone else has a district loss. So it isn't riskiing the #1 seed if they run the table. But don't you see where i am coming from i dont know if anyone would reject a chance to play in that shootout except maybe Linton who already has a very tough schedule.
scc wrote:bballuvr wrote:NADA 11, no, it is as simple as this: you CAN'T play more than 19. It DOES matter. I repeat, you CAN'T play more than 19. It is very simple, it is really not subjective, it is objective. Don't like it, get on the agenda of the next NDHSAA meeting and complain to them
Just to put this issue to bed...
http://www.ndhsaa.com/athletics/basketb ... ations.pdf
Rule 6: "Total games played by any team shall not exceed nineteen regular season games..."
LaMoure has 20 games listed on their schedule, but the Tappen game doesn't count. It's that simple.
nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:bballuvr wrote:NADA 11, no, it is as simple as this: you CAN'T play more than 19. It DOES matter. I repeat, you CAN'T play more than 19. It is very simple, it is really not subjective, it is objective. Don't like it, get on the agenda of the next NDHSAA meeting and complain to them
Just to put this issue to bed...
http://www.ndhsaa.com/athletics/basketb ... ations.pdf
Rule 6: "Total games played by any team shall not exceed nineteen regular season games..."
LaMoure has 20 games listed on their schedule, but the Tappen game doesn't count. It's that simple.
lamoure should be penalized for having more than 20 games on the schedule then, dont award them for losing a game that counts and not having it on the overall record.
Baller wrote:nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:bballuvr wrote:NADA 11, no, it is as simple as this: you CAN'T play more than 19. It DOES matter. I repeat, you CAN'T play more than 19. It is very simple, it is really not subjective, it is objective. Don't like it, get on the agenda of the next NDHSAA meeting and complain to them
Just to put this issue to bed...
http://www.ndhsaa.com/athletics/basketb ... ations.pdf
Rule 6: "Total games played by any team shall not exceed nineteen regular season games..."
LaMoure has 20 games listed on their schedule, but the Tappen game doesn't count. It's that simple.
lamoure should be penalized for having more than 20 games on the schedule then, dont award them for losing a game that counts and not having it on the overall record.
They did NOT play 20 games...the JV played one. 20 - 1 = 19
nadal11 wrote:Baller wrote:nadal11 wrote:scc wrote:bballuvr wrote:NADA 11, no, it is as simple as this: you CAN'T play more than 19. It DOES matter. I repeat, you CAN'T play more than 19. It is very simple, it is really not subjective, it is objective. Don't like it, get on the agenda of the next NDHSAA meeting and complain to them
Just to put this issue to bed...
http://www.ndhsaa.com/athletics/basketb ... ations.pdf
Rule 6: "Total games played by any team shall not exceed nineteen regular season games..."
LaMoure has 20 games listed on their schedule, but the Tappen game doesn't count. It's that simple.
lamoure should be penalized for having more than 20 games on the schedule then, dont award them for losing a game that counts and not having it on the overall record.
They did NOT play 20 games...the JV played one. 20 - 1 = 19
the schedule has 20. you get my point though
poweraidman wrote:drop the subject, nothing you can do about it its perfectly legal.
nadal11 wrote:i guess i've never heard of "points" in district games, in the papers all i see is the standings but not the points.
scc wrote:Are there any thoughts on who might be able to beat Watford City? They seem to be cruising right now.
bballuvr wrote:NADA, whats up with the anti-LaMoure bias. This has been done MANY MANY times. Give it a rest.
nadal11 wrote:bballuvr wrote:NADA, whats up with the anti-LaMoure bias. This has been done MANY MANY times. Give it a rest.
nothing against lamoure, they have an awsome team! but the rule just doesn't make sense and it should be thrown away that's all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests