baseball wrote:are we thinking about the same Lindgren?? tall, long blond hair with the headband?? from what i remember he was pretty skinny too so i dont know he is that much stronger then Shockman
hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
bballuvr wrote:You guys are funny.
It might be interesting. Kulm can put a couple big guys on the floor and take up some space. Haven't seen Nitschke to know much about him. If he is 6'6" or close, he can certainly be a presence in some manner. Lindgren is a nice player and is capable of playing on both ends of the floor. Kulm has some quickness in Knutson, Toay and Anderson. Not sure who they go to after that.
I'm sure Coach Strobel will have some ideas and plans for Saturday. Kulm is certainly capable of creating some things for LaMoure to prepare for.
I will say if Kulm isn't ready to get up and down the floor with LaMoure, it could be a long night for them. If Kulm does shut Shockman down to 10 or so, which nobody has done yet, there are four other guys to guard; Holen, Watkins, Schrader and Stemen. These 4 can all score outside anytime, and a couple of them get to the basket well too.
Should be a fun Dist. 5 game.
bballuvr wrote:You guys are funny.
It might be interesting. Kulm can put a couple big guys on the floor and take up some space. Haven't seen Nitschke to know much about him. If he is 6'6" or close, he can certainly be a presence in some manner. Lindgren is a nice player and is capable of playing on both ends of the floor. Kulm has some quickness in Knutson, Toay and Anderson. Not sure who they go to after that.
I'm sure Coach Strobel will have some ideas and plans for Saturday. Kulm is certainly capable of creating some things for LaMoure to prepare for.
I will say if Kulm isn't ready to get up and down the floor with LaMoure, it could be a long night for them. If Kulm does shut Shockman down to 10 or so, which nobody has done yet, there are four other guys to guard; Holen, Watkins, Schrader and Stemen. These 4 can all score outside anytime, and a couple of them get to the basket well too.
Should be a fun Dist. 5 game.
poweraidman wrote:im thinking its gonna be a close game either way, Lingren will do a good job slowing him down, he held schokman to like 10 last year and scored 25 on him last year, Lindgren is a very strong player and will make schockman work for his points, I think schockman is just to skinny and weak to handle Lindgren, The gophers are going to have to worry about watkins and holen before they worry about shockman. I dont pick kulm to lose by more than 10 if they do lose.
hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
luckyinlife wrote:hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
Hoopstar, you were right on the money. Shockman had 3 dunks and 21 points.
poweraidman wrote:luckyinlife wrote:hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
Hoopstar, you were right on the money. Shockman had 3 dunks and 21 points.
actually if you watched the game shockman had 4 dunks, 3 on wide open fast breaks and one nice one thru the gophers zone, i dont think shockman scored(maybe he scored 2) when they played man and lindgren was on him, all his points were from fast breaks or when gophers were in zone and lindgren wasnt on him. if you watched closesly you could easily see lindgren was stronger by far pushing shockman wereever he wanted to go. Lindgren scored over shockman almost every time he touched the ball on the block,(which idk why but he never got it enough) Lamoure's key to sucsess in this game was they beat kulm down the court and watkins hit a lot of wide open shots when kulm was in a zone. Kulm cut the lead to 12 or 11 in the 3rd but towards the end of the fourth they seemed to get nervous and lamoure took advatage. You could clearly see that lamoure has more varsity exp. on the floor. You guys were right that lamoure would win, but it wasnt a huge blowout, for the number 2 rated team in state vs. number 4th rated team in district, it wasnt to bad, i expect it to be closer the next time these two play. Look at 2 years ago, PBK smoked lamoure the first time by 25 in stutsmans and every game from there on lamoure got closer until almost beating them in the region championship.
CHS wrote:I seen Strasburg beat Linton and also Steele beat Linton last weekened.
basketballer wrote:poweraidman wrote:luckyinlife wrote:hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
Hoopstar, you were right on the money. Shockman had 3 dunks and 21 points.
actually if you watched the game shockman had 4 dunks, 3 on wide open fast breaks and one nice one thru the gophers zone, i dont think shockman scored(maybe he scored 2) when they played man and lindgren was on him, all his points were from fast breaks or when gophers were in zone and lindgren wasnt on him. if you watched closesly you could easily see lindgren was stronger by far pushing shockman wereever he wanted to go. Lindgren scored over shockman almost every time he touched the ball on the block,(which idk why but he never got it enough) Lamoure's key to sucsess in this game was they beat kulm down the court and watkins hit a lot of wide open shots when kulm was in a zone. Kulm cut the lead to 12 or 11 in the 3rd but towards the end of the fourth they seemed to get nervous and lamoure took advatage. You could clearly see that lamoure has more varsity exp. on the floor. You guys were right that lamoure would win, but it wasnt a huge blowout, for the number 2 rated team in state vs. number 4th rated team in district, it wasnt to bad, i expect it to be closer the next time these two play. Look at 2 years ago, PBK smoked lamoure the first time by 25 in stutsmans and every game from there on lamoure got closer until almost beating them in the region championship.
You have got to be kidding me. Shockman pushed him around and beat him up the floor also. And it shows with the stat that Shockman outrebounded Lindgren 11-3. And exactly Lindgren should have got the ball more he probably only missed one shot the whole game, but Shockman denied the ball very well and the guards also helped by adding pressure to the passers. I think that Anderson didn't have his greatest game, but neither did Schrader of LaMoure and Holen. It seemed to me like Lindgren took plays off quite a bit, i could be wrong, but it just appeared to be that way. I was impressed with Kulm, but Knudson and Lindgren need a little more help from Nitshke, Elhard, and Anderson if they want to give LaMoure a run for their money come districts and regions.
hoopsfan23 wrote:basketballer wrote:poweraidman wrote:luckyinlife wrote:hoopsstar2391 wrote:Why are we talking about Kulm and LaMoure???? It's not even gonna be close, have you seen LaMoure play this year. How many times have we heard that somebody can slow Shockman down???? Carlblom couldnt even slow him down, so how is Lindgren going to when an all-stater can't. LaMoure wins in a big blowout.
Hoopstar, you were right on the money. Shockman had 3 dunks and 21 points.
actually if you watched the game shockman had 4 dunks, 3 on wide open fast breaks and one nice one thru the gophers zone, i dont think shockman scored(maybe he scored 2) when they played man and lindgren was on him, all his points were from fast breaks or when gophers were in zone and lindgren wasnt on him. if you watched closesly you could easily see lindgren was stronger by far pushing shockman wereever he wanted to go. Lindgren scored over shockman almost every time he touched the ball on the block,(which idk why but he never got it enough) Lamoure's key to sucsess in this game was they beat kulm down the court and watkins hit a lot of wide open shots when kulm was in a zone. Kulm cut the lead to 12 or 11 in the 3rd but towards the end of the fourth they seemed to get nervous and lamoure took advatage. You could clearly see that lamoure has more varsity exp. on the floor. You guys were right that lamoure would win, but it wasnt a huge blowout, for the number 2 rated team in state vs. number 4th rated team in district, it wasnt to bad, i expect it to be closer the next time these two play. Look at 2 years ago, PBK smoked lamoure the first time by 25 in stutsmans and every game from there on lamoure got closer until almost beating them in the region championship.
You have got to be kidding me. Shockman pushed him around and beat him up the floor also. And it shows with the stat that Shockman outrebounded Lindgren 11-3. And exactly Lindgren should have got the ball more he probably only missed one shot the whole game, but Shockman denied the ball very well and the guards also helped by adding pressure to the passers. I think that Anderson didn't have his greatest game, but neither did Schrader of LaMoure and Holen. It seemed to me like Lindgren took plays off quite a bit, i could be wrong, but it just appeared to be that way. I was impressed with Kulm, but Knudson and Lindgren need a little more help from Nitshke, Elhard, and Anderson if they want to give LaMoure a run for their money come districts and regions.
Poweraidman he actually had 2 dunks on fastbreaks and another one he almost dunked but just didn't grab the rim. Then he had the one coming down the lane. I agree that Lindgren should get the ball more but in the games that I've seen this year he has had success when he wants the ball. I mean sometimes he takes plays off. When he gives his all, he is extremely talented and a force.
rainbow wrote:i would say that kulm is somewhat overrated..i didnt see them play basketball yesterday..they didnt really get anything going and i saw there sixth man throw a temper tantrum and get T'd up
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests