hahaha....are you kidding me.....was this a make believe game that happened in your mind?.....maybe you should know even a little bit about what the heck your talking about before you post garbage like this....and about the college...well at least you were in the right state......wow......i know i've said this alot over the last couple of days......but "Dumbest Post I've Read in along time".carolina blue wrote:sorry but mike mathison is not very good for being 6'10". during the trinity game, tyler barth was pushing mathison out of the lane almost everytime mathison attempted to post up. barth is like 6'2". mathison should dominate class b cuz there are not many 6'6" bball players, let alone 6'10" to guard him.
i wasn't motivated to read all the previous posts but i saw something about ndsu and him. if he cant dominate in class, there is no way he can play at ndsu
Swine-O wrote:bisonslayer wrote:Come on Benter??? Benter is alot more athletic then Mathiason, Benter All-state tight end that shows athleticism right there. But ok back to Mathiason, UND is goin D-1 they want to bring in kids that are ready to go. Coaches cant teach athleticism, they can teach fundamentals but cant teach speed and qucikness. MR.BASKETBALL TYLER KOENIG struggles at times with bein to slow but makes up for it with shooting (something mathiason doesnt have) and rebounding, granted he has bad knees, but if a Mr. Basketball isn't that great what is a maybe raw potential going to be like. Its all speculation and prediction but I just dont see him making it there.north_border_eagles2106 wrote:Actually we've never said anything about how Big Mike is an amazing basketball player or one of the top players in the state. We just continue to tell people that just because he isn't dominate and he's 6'10 that doesn't mean he isn't good. He's a very good free throw shooter for any big man, especially one that tall. We also just tell you that it would be hard for anyone who started HS at SIX FOOT TWO and ended it at SIX FOOT TEN. He grew 5 inches from his Freshmen to Sophomore year and 3 more from his Sophomore to Junior year. I still think he could play at UND because there is a chance that they will work on his speed and footwork when he gets there. Usually thats what coaches do with their players is work on what they aren't good at. Well, since Mathison has poor footwork and isn't fast enough for a big man, I'm going to go out on a limb and say they'll work on that when he gets there and won't put him on the court until he's ready. We aren't saying that he's going to be a 4 year starter and lead them to that National Championship but he can't be much worse then Benter and Gutter!jetblue12 wrote:bisonslayer wrote:thatoneperson wrote:Mike Mathison has not grown into his height and he is still growing you try being 6'10 in 2 years!!!If he goes to UND they will work his butt off and they will get him to be where they want him to be!
I have been to a handful of UND games, Mathison has NO chance to play. Hes to slow and is to unathletic. Sioux are gonna be D-1, and even if he goes their to play, he will have no part in their transition to D-1.
i agree with you....
careful the north border people think hes an impact player.......
Come on now, Tyler Koenig not that great???? I've been watching him play since he was in the 6th grade and he used to be absolutely dominant. That's why he went D1 to Wisconson Milwaukee and Started as a true freshman. But then he had knee pain and the coaches there urged him to play through when he should have had surgery, which basically ruined his knee. He's lucky he can still run let alone play basketball and he still dominates at times for UND. so how can you possibly say that he "isn't that great"????????
bisonslayer wrote:Swine-O wrote:bisonslayer wrote:Come on Benter??? Benter is alot more athletic then Mathiason, Benter All-state tight end that shows athleticism right there. But ok back to Mathiason, UND is goin D-1 they want to bring in kids that are ready to go. Coaches cant teach athleticism, they can teach fundamentals but cant teach speed and qucikness. MR.BASKETBALL TYLER KOENIG struggles at times with bein to slow but makes up for it with shooting (something mathiason doesnt have) and rebounding, granted he has bad knees, but if a Mr. Basketball isn't that great what is a maybe raw potential going to be like. Its all speculation and prediction but I just dont see him making it there.north_border_eagles2106 wrote:Actually we've never said anything about how Big Mike is an amazing basketball player or one of the top players in the state. We just continue to tell people that just because he isn't dominate and he's 6'10 that doesn't mean he isn't good. He's a very good free throw shooter for any big man, especially one that tall. We also just tell you that it would be hard for anyone who started HS at SIX FOOT TWO and ended it at SIX FOOT TEN. He grew 5 inches from his Freshmen to Sophomore year and 3 more from his Sophomore to Junior year. I still think he could play at UND because there is a chance that they will work on his speed and footwork when he gets there. Usually thats what coaches do with their players is work on what they aren't good at. Well, since Mathison has poor footwork and isn't fast enough for a big man, I'm going to go out on a limb and say they'll work on that when he gets there and won't put him on the court until he's ready. We aren't saying that he's going to be a 4 year starter and lead them to that National Championship but he can't be much worse then Benter and Gutter!jetblue12 wrote:bisonslayer wrote:thatoneperson wrote:Mike Mathison has not grown into his height and he is still growing you try being 6'10 in 2 years!!!If he goes to UND they will work his butt off and they will get him to be where they want him to be!
I have been to a handful of UND games, Mathison has NO chance to play. Hes to slow and is to unathletic. Sioux are gonna be D-1, and even if he goes their to play, he will have no part in their transition to D-1.
i agree with you....
careful the north border people think hes an impact player.......
Come on now, Tyler Koenig not that great???? I've been watching him play since he was in the 6th grade and he used to be absolutely dominant. That's why he went D1 to Wisconson Milwaukee and Started as a true freshman. But then he had knee pain and the coaches there urged him to play through when he should have had surgery, which basically ruined his knee. He's lucky he can still run let alone play basketball and he still dominates at times for UND. so how can you possibly say that he "isn't that great"????????
He isnt that great because of what you just said and what i said. His bad knees slow him down. If he was that "great" he would be better at the D-2 level. High school I liked watching him to and he was dominant. I was simply using Koenig as an example that UND is no joke and that guys like Mathiason can't play there. Koenig is good. but he isnt great.
carolina blue wrote:sorry but mike mathison is not very good for being 6'10". during the trinity game, tyler barth was pushing mathison out of the lane almost everytime mathison attempted to post up. barth is like 6'2". mathison should dominate class b cuz there are not many 6'6" bball players, let alone 6'10" to guard him.
i wasn't motivated to read all the previous posts but i saw something about ndsu and him. if he cant dominate in class, there is no way he can play at ndsu
NBE2007 wrote:Yeah..I wasn't aware that there was a DT vs NB game...completely blew past me. And he's going to UND not NDSU...it helps to READ the previous posts before posting one of your own.
region 2 opinion wrote:Why don't we all just wait and see for a bit here. None of you know what it takes to develop a big guy. UND has some very good new coaches that have a little more experience and knowledge than all of us put together. They think Mathison can develop into a player there and who are we to question that. If they are interested enough to put time into him who are we to argue. I truely believe he will develop into a player there too but none of you believe it so why don't we just wait and see and quit bashing him. Noone expects him to walk onto the court and dominate, but lets see what happens in a couple years. You can't teach 6'10". Some of you guys think you know everything and you don't know sh%$ and it drives me crazy. Be patient!!
region 2 opinion wrote:Why don't we all just wait and see for a bit here. None of you know what it takes to develop a big guy. UND has some very good new coaches that have a little more experience and knowledge than all of us put together. They think Mathison can develop into a player there and who are we to question that. If they are interested enough to put time into him who are we to argue. I truely believe he will develop into a player there too but none of you believe it so why don't we just wait and see and quit bashing him. Noone expects him to walk onto the court and dominate, but lets see what happens in a couple years. You can't teach 6'10". Some of you guys think you know everything and you don't know sh%$ and it drives me crazy. Be patient!!
Wildcat wrote:What's with the all-bold? Is that supposed to make us think long and hard about your post? Haha, I don't get it.
Anyways, I saw Mathison at the state tournament and I didn't think he was that great for being 6-10. Someone said he could do better than Benter or he could do just as well. I watched Benter play in high school and Benter would have eaten this kid alive.
Mathison struggles with his size and his feet are very slow. He should have ran track in the spring or something to help his speed.
If he's 6-10, then I'm guessing he went to a lot of camps and stuff? Did he play AAU ball? He should be spending all of his free time in gyms.
First time I saw Mathison, I thought he was a sophomore because of how uncoordinated he was. He reminded me of Minot Ryan's Mitch Mayer when Mayer was a sophomore. Mayer would use Mathison pretty good, and even Mayer wasn't that great for his size.
Wildcat wrote:region 2 opinion wrote:Why don't we all just wait and see for a bit here. None of you know what it takes to develop a big guy. UND has some very good new coaches that have a little more experience and knowledge than all of us put together. They think Mathison can develop into a player there and who are we to question that. If they are interested enough to put time into him who are we to argue. I truely believe he will develop into a player there too but none of you believe it so why don't we just wait and see and quit bashing him. Noone expects him to walk onto the court and dominate, but lets see what happens in a couple years. You can't teach 6'10". Some of you guys think you know everything and you don't know sh%$ and it drives me crazy. Be patient!!
What's with the all-bold? Is that supposed to make us think long and hard about your post? Haha, I don't get it.
Anyways, I saw Mathison at the state tournament and I didn't think he was that great for being 6-10. Someone said he could do better than Benter or he could do just as well. I watched Benter play in high school and Benter would have eaten this kid alive.
Mathison struggles with his size and his feet are very slow. He should have ran track in the spring or something to help his speed.
If he's 6-10, then I'm guessing he went to a lot of camps and stuff? Did he play AAU ball? He should be spending all of his free time in gyms.
First time I saw Mathison, I thought he was a sophomore because of how uncoordinated he was. He reminded me of Minot Ryan's Mitch Mayer when Mayer was a sophomore. Mayer would use Mathison pretty good, and even Mayer wasn't that great for his size.
horne98 wrote:yeah i guess he played one tournament with an aau team in the spring but then played with north border in the summer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests