jetblue12 wrote:i would rather see two halves of 18 minutes over the shot clock,,,, with the 4 quarters to much time is wasted at the last minute of quarters for the last second shot, so there i would like to see the clock. but i think halves would be better.
baller01 wrote:I shot clock would benefit the good teams but would absoutely kill the bad team. If you are a weaker team playing against a good team, the only chance you have to win is go down and take a minute off the clock everytime. If class B got a shot clock there would be a lot of 50+ blowouts. Not the normal 20-30 point blowouts.
ndlionsfan wrote:I read in this month's NDHSAA Bulletin that after switching to two 18 min halves this year, games were actually 12.5% longer. I don't know what the cause of it was, but I think the idea of going to halves was to keep the games moving with less down time. I don't think switching to halves is a great idea unless they go 16 min halves.
ndlionsfan wrote:I read in this month's NDHSAA Bulletin that after switching to two 18 min halves this year, games were actually 12.5% longer. I don't know what the cause of it was, but I think the idea of going to halves was to keep the games moving with less down time. I don't think switching to halves is a great idea unless they go 16 min halves.
magic715 wrote:ndlionsfan wrote:I read in this month's NDHSAA Bulletin that after switching to two 18 min halves this year, games were actually 12.5% longer. I don't know what the cause of it was, but I think the idea of going to halves was to keep the games moving with less down time. I don't think switching to halves is a great idea unless they go 16 min halves.
The reason for more time, was more fouls, with an extra 2 minutes, there are alot of extra fouls, i heard they were thinking of going to 10 and 12 on the fouls for shots. this would eliminate some of the foul shooting. i do know the games did last longer cause the varsity games were starting a half hr or more late most of the time.
ndlionsfan wrote:Yeah, but the idea behind going to halves was to cut down the breaks in the game. So even though they added 2 minutes to each half, because they have fewer breaks the games would actually be about the same or even shorter.
Claz B Fan wrote:Nope no shot clock thats what makes Class B Class B
beavof77 wrote:IMO...I don't really see a need for a shot clock in Class B. Most teams run a fast paced offense that really doesn't require a shot clock. I think the shot clock may be nice say in the 4th quarter, and start it with so many min. left to prevent from lots of stalling, or fouling which can extend games up to an hour. Any thoughts towards an idea similar to that?
rep wrote:
either have it or don't, imo.
having it in the fourth quarter, would be okay, but what about blow outs? where do you draw the line between having it and not?
beavof77 wrote:rep wrote:
either have it or don't, imo.
having it in the fourth quarter, would be okay, but what about blow outs? where do you draw the line between having it and not?
Yeah, that is true..I know this sounds far fetched but I've heard of teams that are getting blown out start stalling so the score doesn't get even worse. Maybe if the game is with in 15 or so incorperate the clock?
A_50_h wrote:After watching last years title game between DT and May-Port, and seeing how those two teams slowed it down and took the air out of the ball I would say there should definetly should be a shot clock. I also think they should make it two halves of 16 minutes each.
A_50_h wrote:After watching last years title game between DT and May-Port, and seeing how those two teams slowed it down and took the air out of the ball I would say there should definetly should be a shot clock. I also think they should make it two halves of 16 minutes each.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests