sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
and u cant say that until its proven
baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
and u cant say that until its proven
Well then how can you say that those 5 are better then Lorenz? He proved last year he was the only junior worthy of 1st team all-state. If we are going by proving things, then Lorenz is the only one that has proven anything. 1st team all-state, state tournament MVP, and got his team a second place at state. Sorry man, if we are going by what has been proven, Lorenz blows those 5 away.
sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
and u cant say that until its proven
Well then how can you say that those 5 are better then Lorenz? He proved last year he was the only junior worthy of 1st team all-state. If we are going by proving things, then Lorenz is the only one that has proven anything. 1st team all-state, state tournament MVP, and got his team a second place at state. Sorry man, if we are going by what has been proven, Lorenz blows those 5 away.
he has proven plenty but so have the 5 i said earlier. there are more than 5 players that have proven worth of getting 1st team allstate but his team hasnt done what those other teams have done and that is why i think they should get it over him.
maria weigelt was all state 2nd team junior year and didnt get all state her senior year just becuz her team didnt do as well. i think its gonna be the same for him this year.baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
and u cant say that until its proven
Well then how can you say that those 5 are better then Lorenz? He proved last year he was the only junior worthy of 1st team all-state. If we are going by proving things, then Lorenz is the only one that has proven anything. 1st team all-state, state tournament MVP, and got his team a second place at state. Sorry man, if we are going by what has been proven, Lorenz blows those 5 away.
he has proven plenty but so have the 5 i said earlier. there are more than 5 players that have proven worth of getting 1st team allstate but his team hasnt done what those other teams have done and that is why i think they should get it over him.
What have the other guys got going for them that Lorenz doesn't. Dude, I'm not saying those 5 aren't worthy of 1st team too. I'm just saying Lorenz had it last year. I don't know why he would go from 1st team to 2nd team when he is having a better year this year...
sodadrinker wrote:maria weigelt was all state 2nd team junior year and didnt get all state her senior year just becuz her team didnt do as well. i think its gonna be the same for him this year.baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:like i said before i think lorenz should be on the second team but his team overall isnt as good as last year and unless they make it to state and do some good i dont know how u can pick over the 5 i said earlier
Because Lorenz would hold them below there average.
and u cant say that until its proven
Well then how can you say that those 5 are better then Lorenz? He proved last year he was the only junior worthy of 1st team all-state. If we are going by proving things, then Lorenz is the only one that has proven anything. 1st team all-state, state tournament MVP, and got his team a second place at state. Sorry man, if we are going by what has been proven, Lorenz blows those 5 away.
he has proven plenty but so have the 5 i said earlier. there are more than 5 players that have proven worth of getting 1st team allstate but his team hasnt done what those other teams have done and that is why i think they should get it over him.
What have the other guys got going for them that Lorenz doesn't. Dude, I'm not saying those 5 aren't worthy of 1st team too. I'm just saying Lorenz had it last year. I don't know why he would go from 1st team to 2nd team when he is having a better year this year...
sodadrinker wrote:i think tony ironheart, mark bakkum, jacob wheeling, justin shipman, and nathaniel packineau will be on the 1st team. theyre all on teams that have done very well this year and they are big time players. i think lorenz is a good player but i just feel these 5 are alittle above him this year. however if mpcg makes state and does well it will be becuz of lorenz and that will change my mind
sodadrinker wrote:sodadrinker wrote:i think tony ironheart, mark bakkum, jacob wheeling, justin shipman, and nathaniel packineau will be on the 1st team. theyre all on teams that have done very well this year and they are big time players. i think lorenz is a good player but i just feel these 5 are alittle above him this year. however if mpcg makes state and does well it will be becuz of lorenz and that will change my mind
first page big guy
baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:sodadrinker wrote:i think tony ironheart, mark bakkum, jacob wheeling, justin shipman, and nathaniel packineau will be on the 1st team. theyre all on teams that have done very well this year and they are big time players. i think lorenz is a good player but i just feel these 5 are alittle above him this year. however if mpcg makes state and does well it will be becuz of lorenz and that will change my mind
first page big guy
Well look at it like this. Either Shipmans or Packineaus teams isn't going to state. So are you dropping which ever one doesn't make it to state?
The Schwab wrote:why, just wondering...i'm not arguing with you saying that Tony shouldnt be first team all state....because he should......Lorenz is the best defensive player in the state....he has led his team well so far this year......I believe that he deserves to make the First Team all state squad...without a question.ClassBballa wrote:cubsfan wrote:ClassBballa wrote:sodadrinker wrote:Flyer wrote:That I feel is still up in the air depending on how teams do the rest of the year: Some of the players that stick out are: Ironheart--FW, Lorenz--MPCG,--Wheeling--Killdeer, Moe--Park River, Nathaniel Packineau--Parshall, Shipman--Watford City, Bakkum--SD...Just to name a few..
Moe?? i dont know if hes that much of a stand out and i honestly dont think lorenz will be on the first team again this year
my guess is that lorenz will make all state but partially becuase he did last year. DOn't get me wrong he is a really good player but he isn't the dominant take over the game player like some of the others that will be first team all state like Tony and Mark. I think their are others who definately deserve it over him. Defense is a big part of the game but not all of the game.
How can you honestly say that. How does he not take over every game he plays in? He is averaging around 20 and 10 rebounds per game. And that isn't even saying that he takes out the other teams best player each and every game.
i think he is averageing less than 20 a game and most of those 20 are quiet (not saying there is anything wrong with that), but he doesn't really take complete control of the game like some do. I just saw Tony stepup and score 32, 9 or 10 free throws in the 4th quarter. Lorenz is a great player and a great defender but he isn't the natural scorer like the others. They have the advantage when it comes to making all state, especially if their teams make it to state and his doesn't.
sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:sodadrinker wrote:i think tony ironheart, mark bakkum, jacob wheeling, justin shipman, and nathaniel packineau will be on the 1st team. theyre all on teams that have done very well this year and they are big time players. i think lorenz is a good player but i just feel these 5 are alittle above him this year. however if mpcg makes state and does well it will be becuz of lorenz and that will change my mind
first page big guy
Well look at it like this. Either Shipmans or Packineaus teams isn't going to state. So are you dropping which ever one doesn't make it to state?
uve made a valid point but my opinion is my opinion and i will tell u that i would rather have anyone in the state guard me besides lorenz but this is just the way i feel. most people think he should be first team all state and maybe he will but this is just the way i feel about it
baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:baller01 wrote:sodadrinker wrote:sodadrinker wrote:i think tony ironheart, mark bakkum, jacob wheeling, justin shipman, and nathaniel packineau will be on the 1st team. theyre all on teams that have done very well this year and they are big time players. i think lorenz is a good player but i just feel these 5 are alittle above him this year. however if mpcg makes state and does well it will be becuz of lorenz and that will change my mind
first page big guy
Well look at it like this. Either Shipmans or Packineaus teams isn't going to state. So are you dropping which ever one doesn't make it to state?
uve made a valid point but my opinion is my opinion and i will tell u that i would rather have anyone in the state guard me besides lorenz but this is just the way i feel. most people think he should be first team all state and maybe he will but this is just the way i feel about it
Well I'm glad you see my point and I also see your point. You named 5 tremendous players there. All 6 that we talked about deserve 1st team all-state.
Aaronih wrote:Honestly fellas, Who's hands do you want the ball on in crunch time by down by 1 w/2 mins left in the game out of the top 6 in the state who has stepped up come tourney time This year, not to be bias but TI's #'s are kobe's & nash in 1. hes had games of 29,25,32 so far not including the assist's, steals, rebs, dunno..just curious if any 1 of these guys hav close to #'s like that in tourney play yet?? i dunno just being curious..do u guys buy that..u think TI"S got a shot at MR.Basketball..
i think ironheart is the best player in class b basketball as for mr. basketball i think he should win it but there are several good class a players who might get as well.ndsbest44 wrote:Aaronih wrote:Honestly fellas, Who's hands do you want the ball on in crunch time by down by 1 w/2 mins left in the game out of the top 6 in the state who has stepped up come tourney time This year, not to be bias but TI's #'s are kobe's & nash in 1. hes had games of 29,25,32 so far not including the assist's, steals, rebs, dunno..just curious if any 1 of these guys hav close to #'s like that in tourney play yet?? i dunno just being curious..do u guys buy that..u think TI"S got a shot at MR.Basketball..
I think he's a great player, but i don't think he has a shot at Mr.basketball
I would LOVE to see a class B guy get the award.....but it wont happen because of the bias in the media toward class A players........Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
The Schwab wrote:I would LOVE to see a class B guy get the award.....but it wont happen because of the bias in the media toward class A players........Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
SCC wrote:The Schwab wrote:I would LOVE to see a class B guy get the award.....but it wont happen because of the bias in the media toward class A players........Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
I think the winner will come from Class A because they have a few players just above the top of Class B this year. This is coming from a Class B fan.
I dont know about that........If MPCG makes it to state......OR Four Winds makes it to state and the championship game (since they vote for Mr. Bball on the Saturday morning of the state b).....then I feel that Luke Lorenz and Tony Ironheart would have just as good of credentials as any class A player.SCC wrote:The Schwab wrote:I would LOVE to see a class B guy get the award.....but it wont happen because of the bias in the media toward class A players........Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
I think the winner will come from Class A because they have a few players just above the top of Class B this year. This is coming from a Class B fan.
Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
baller01 wrote:Aaronih wrote:Tell me whos better (RIGHT NOW) putting up number's like that when it counts and who is gonna win MR.Basketball
Bakkum would have SEVERAL 30+ point games if he was selfish and scored at the end of games. Bakkum usually scores a lot in the first half, gets his team a big lead, and then doesn't score the second half because he doesn't need to. For example, the last game of districts he was scoring at will. He had 21 points at half time and easily could have put up 40-50 points. Steele was up by about 30 or 40 points at halftime and Bakkum felt he didn't need to score the second half obviously so he didn't. He finished with 27 when, like I said, he easily could've had 40+. Looking at NDHSAA I see that Ironharts big games all come when they blow a team out.
39 in a 88-60 win over Carrington
31 in a 100-51 win over BCN
35 in a 106-51 win over Maddock
Ironhart has three 30 point games while his team wins by an average of 44 points.
My question to you is, why score when you don't need to?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests