baller01 wrote:SCC wrote:1 Lisbon (9) 14-0 99 1
2 Hankinson 15-0 76 4
3 Hazen (1) 13-1 73 3
4 Minnewaukan-Leeds 14-1 63 5
5 Beulah 13-2 49 7
6 Killdeer 13-2 48 2
7 Watford City 13-1 45 6
8 Four Winds 15-1 28 10
9 Dickinson Trinity 12-2 27 9
10 Linton 14-3 9 8
TIE Park River 15-1 9 10
TIE Steele-Dawson 13-1 9 10
[align=justify]Others Receiving Votes: May-Port CG (11-4), Kindred (11-4), Standing Rock (11-3), Grafton (13-3), Westhope-Newburg (11-2).[/align]
So with Killdeer winning pretty easily, Linton thumping Standing rock, and Dickinson Trinity blowing away Beulah, how does this affect the polls for next week? Either Lisbon or Hankinson is going to lose yet this week. Anyone else got some scores from ranked teams?
rep wrote:NATURAL TALENT wrote:rep wrote:four winds strong-armed maddock tonight
Yeah, big time, but what is maddock, 1-15?
doesn't matter how bad a team is, when you score 105 points in a 32 minute game, that is strong-arming
Indians Alumni wrote:rep wrote:NATURAL TALENT wrote:rep wrote:four winds strong-armed maddock tonight
Yeah, big time, but what is maddock, 1-15?
doesn't matter how bad a team is, when you score 105 points in a 32 minute game, that is strong-arming
First everyone says they barely win, so they don't get the votes! Now they "strong arm" a team now we are beating up on them! Man! Tough crowd.
Just because you are up alot does not mean you don't run your offense, you take the scoring oppritunities as they come, it is a tough call as a coach to have your kids not take easy baskets. As a coach you teach your team to be aggressive, I am not saying run up the score but you teach them to take the easy buckets and not be passive. Coach Smith is not one to run up the score on anyone. He remembers how it felt when other teams done that to them.
Indians Alumni wrote:Just because you are up alot does not mean you don't run your offense, you take the scoring oppritunities as they come, it is a tough call as a coach to have your kids not take easy baskets. As a coach you teach your team to be aggressive, I am not saying run up the score but you teach them to take the easy buckets and not be passive. Coach Smith is not one to run up the score on anyone. He remembers how it felt when other teams done that to them.
Indians Alumni wrote:rep wrote:NATURAL TALENT wrote:rep wrote:four winds strong-armed maddock tonight
Yeah, big time, but what is maddock, 1-15?
doesn't matter how bad a team is, when you score 105 points in a 32 minute game, that is strong-arming
First everyone says they barely win, so they don't get the votes! Now they "strong arm" a team now we are beating up on them! Man! Tough crowd.
Just because you are up alot does not mean you don't run your offense, you take the scoring oppritunities as they come, it is a tough call as a coach to have your kids not take easy baskets. As a coach you teach your team to be aggressive, I am not saying run up the score but you teach them to take the easy buckets and not be passive. Coach Smith is not one to run up the score on anyone. He remembers how it felt when other teams done that to them.
baseball wrote:Indians Alumni wrote:Just because you are up alot does not mean you don't run your offense, you take the scoring oppritunities as they come, it is a tough call as a coach to have your kids not take easy baskets. As a coach you teach your team to be aggressive, I am not saying run up the score but you teach them to take the easy buckets and not be passive. Coach Smith is not one to run up the score on anyone. He remembers how it felt when other teams done that to them.
so thats why your all state player is scoring 35 in a 50 point win?? alot of teams would use teams like that as confidence biulders for the guys who are struggling, not a game to rise their PPG (sizer too)
baseball wrote:i will agree if its an easy 2 take it, its jsut one of my biggest pet peeves when a teams star player goes out and scores a career high against a team they beat by 60....i didnt say he scored all of his points in the 2nd half becuase i doubt he even played a lot then but its just the idea of seeing a star score that much in a win like that. i ddint mean to start a big arguement aobut it, jsut a personally feelign ive always had i guess
I didn't know there was a right way to score 106 points.ndsportsfan98 wrote:Four Winds 106, Maddock 51
M 18 32 38 51
FW 26 43 79 106
M: Backstrom 3, Burgrud 12, Backstrom 4, Lunde 19, Wack 4, Griffin 2, Buehler 7, Sears 2.
FW: T. Ironheart 35, Herman 17, I. Lovejoy 18, Littleghost 9, Littlewind 5, Alberts 7, C. Ironheart 9, Lawrence 4, Demarce 4, Lovejoy 2.
By looking at the boxscore, it was the 3rd quarter that made the difference. FW up only by 11 at halftime meant most of those starters played the majority of the 36-6 3rd quarter they outscored Maddock by. I've got no problem with teams scoring 106 points, as long as its the right way. (not fastbreaking and casting 3's with their starters in.) Their is another topic on the girls side of Steele-Dawson winning their game 95-8 over Wing. Same story, take the starters out, and if that 2nd group is better then the team your playing, what can you do?
ndsportsfan98 wrote:Four Winds 106, Maddock 51
M 18 32 38 51
FW 26 43 79 106
M: Backstrom 3, Burgrud 12, Backstrom 4, Lunde 19, Wack 4, Griffin 2, Buehler 7, Sears 2.
FW: T. Ironheart 35, Herman 17, I. Lovejoy 18, Littleghost 9, Littlewind 5, Alberts 7, C. Ironheart 9, Lawrence 4, Demarce 4, Lovejoy 2.
By looking at the boxscore, it was the 3rd quarter that made the difference. FW up only by 11 at halftime meant most of those starters played the majority of the 36-6 3rd quarter they outscored Maddock by. I've got no problem with teams scoring 106 points, as long as its the right way. (not fastbreaking and casting 3's with their starters in.) Their is another topic on the girls side of Steele-Dawson winning their game 95-8 over Wing. Same story, take the starters out, and if that 2nd group is better then the team your playing, what can you do?
Indians Alumni wrote:ndsportsfan98 wrote:Four Winds 106, Maddock 51
M 18 32 38 51
FW 26 43 79 106
M: Backstrom 3, Burgrud 12, Backstrom 4, Lunde 19, Wack 4, Griffin 2, Buehler 7, Sears 2.
FW: T. Ironheart 35, Herman 17, I. Lovejoy 18, Littleghost 9, Littlewind 5, Alberts 7, C. Ironheart 9, Lawrence 4, Demarce 4, Lovejoy 2.
By looking at the boxscore, it was the 3rd quarter that made the difference. FW up only by 11 at halftime meant most of those starters played the majority of the 36-6 3rd quarter they outscored Maddock by. I've got no problem with teams scoring 106 points, as long as its the right way. (not fastbreaking and casting 3's with their starters in.) Their is another topic on the girls side of Steele-Dawson winning their game 95-8 over Wing. Same story, take the starters out, and if that 2nd group is better then the team your playing, what can you do?
I agree on both statements.
NBE2007 wrote:North Border won by 59 over Cavalier 107-48 but knowing that Cavalier isn't a quality team...107 points is still impressive
fruit snack wrote:giving up 51 points to maddock is not impressive
Stromer wrote:fruit snack wrote:giving up 51 points to maddock is not impressive
But WC giving up 49 to maddock is!? :D :?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests