Region 4

by **cash** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:09 am

harvey beat midkota improving their record to 9-3, 3-1 in the district

by **sodadrinker** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:18 pm

harvey and new rockford have both been playing some pretty good ball as of late one those teams could actually make the region tourney if they keep it together

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 5:46 pm

sodadrinker wrote:harvey and new rockford have both been playing some pretty good ball as of late one those teams could actually make the region tourney if they keep it together

NRS has won 1 out of their last 5 games, I wouldnt call that pretty good ball. Harvey has won 5 in a row, thats pretty good ball.

by **cash** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 5:49 pm

NATURAL TALENT wrote:
sodadrinker wrote:harvey and new rockford have both been playing some pretty good ball as of late one those teams could actually make the region tourney if they keep it together

NRS has won 1 out of their last 5 games, I wouldnt call that pretty good ball. Harvey has won 5 in a row, thats pretty good ball.

harvey beat a couple good teams too, midkota, lakota, and rugby (very inconsistent team), they have a tough game thursday against four winds in harvey

by **sodadrinker** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:40 pm

NATURAL TALENT wrote:
sodadrinker wrote:harvey and new rockford have both been playing some pretty good ball as of late one those teams could actually make the region tourney if they keep it together

NRS has won 1 out of their last 5 games, I wouldnt call that pretty good ball. Harvey has won 5 in a row, thats pretty good ball.

3 of new rockfords losses were to wells county, 4 winds, and leeds and they held 4 winds and leeds to way less points than they average on the year. i didnt say they were gonna win the region i said they were playin some pretty good ball, which they are and they have a chance to make regionals. they did struggle earlier in the year but beating carrington really mixed things up in district 7.

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:47 pm

Just because they didnt get blown out by FW or LM doesnt mean they are playing good ball. Some teams have off nights. Playing good ball is winning games.

by **sodadrinker** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:58 pm

so ur saying if 4 winds plays nr and 4 winds plays a good game and it was a 12 point game u wouldnt give nr credit. 4 winds is obviously the better team and if both play to their full potential 4 winds would win but there is such a thing as making ur opponent not play up to their potential.

by **sodadrinker** » Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:03 pm

i understand that teams can have an off night but i dont see how u cant give nr some credit becuz they are playing twice as well now as they were early in the season

by **Indians Alumni** » Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:46 am

sodadrinker wrote:so ur saying if 4 winds plays nr and 4 winds plays a good game and it was a 12 point game u wouldnt give nr credit. 4 winds is obviously the better team and if both play to their full potential 4 winds would win but there is such a thing as making ur opponent not play up to their potential.

Four Winds didn't have that great of a night. They could have done better, but I am not going to discredit NR. They have a solid program there.

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:58 pm

Indians Alumni wrote:Four Winds didn't have that great of a night. They could have done better, but I am not going to discredit NR. They have a solid program there.

I wasnt discrediting NR either, just pointing out that losing 4 out of 5 isnt a team that is playing good ball.

by **sodadrinker** » Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:56 pm

i shouldve probably stated it differently saying that theyre playing good by saying theyre playing much better than they were earlier in the season

Region 4

Who is online