Page 1 of 1
Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:00 pm
by ndlionsfan
I'm setting the over/under for 1st round region upsets at 5 for Monday. What do you got?
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:32 pm
by Flip
Granted I don't know a lot about class b boys basketball, especially the west where I know nothing, but I'd take the under. I think their are 3 candidates for upsets in the first 3 regions, but after that nothing stands out to me.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:12 pm
by Run4Fun2009
I'll go with OVER
IMO there are 10 possibilities for lower seeds to win over higher seeds...(5-6 likely to happen)
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:49 pm
by ndlionsfan
I should clarify. Not necessarily a lower seed beating a higher seed. There are a lot of #3 teams from one district that are better than the #2 seeds from the other district due to upsets in district tourneys. I mean a true upset where a team that shouldn't win pulls it off.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:27 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Run4Fun2009 wrote:I'll go with OVER
IMO there are 10 possibilities for lower seeds to win over higher seeds...(5-6 likely to happen)
well then with the clarification...I'll say under 5 upsets.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:18 pm
by MTfan4life
That cuts down the amount of games with the clarification, so I'll go under too.
Another over/under:
Number of District tournament #1 seeds that advance to state: 6
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:20 am
by ndlionsfan
MTfan4life wrote:Another over/under:
Number of District tournament #1 seeds that advance to state: 6
That's a good one. I'm going out on a limb and say under. I think region 7 and 8 send a team that didn't win their respective districts and another upset happens in one of the other 6 regions.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:59 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Well we are already at two...after the first few games are in the book
Oak Grove def. Milnor 77-73
Ray def. New Town 59-57
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:21 am
by ndlionsfan
In my opinion, Flasher over Garrison and Cavalier over GCC are slight upsets based on season records and not seeds coming into the region. So in my opinion 3-4 upsets first round, so the under.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:23 am
by ndlionsfan
MTfan4life wrote:That cuts down the amount of games with the clarification, so I'll go under too.
Another over/under:
Number of District tournament #1 seeds that advance to state: 6
Looks to be a good chance that it will be the over.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:56 pm
by ndlionsfan
New one for tomorrow night. Over/Under 180 total points for the FW vs Warwick 3rd place game in Region 4.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:14 pm
by winner-within
ndlionsfan wrote:New one for tomorrow night. Over/Under 180 total points for the FW vs Warwick 3rd place game in Region 4.
Over .........110 to 92.......Warwick
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:51 pm
by Run4Fun2009
definitely feel safe going with the Over there...
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:51 pm
by Run4Fun2009
how about Over/Under 45 points for Langstaff?
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:05 pm
by ndlionsfan
I'm going over on that. I think he goes over 50 easy.
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:12 pm
by WoodyPaige
ndlionsfan wrote:New one for tomorrow night. Over/Under 180 total points for the FW vs Warwick 3rd place game in Region 4.
Didn't these two play in this exact game not too long ago? (last year maybe?) If i'm not mistaken they actually played hard on the defensive end and it was a relatively low scoring. Maybe more in the 120 range? This year will be a different story though i think. It will all depend on how many FW can score because you know Warwick will put up big numbers. OVER
Run4Fun2009 wrote:how about Over/Under 45 points for Langstaff?
Would not be surprised if he goes for 60. OVER
Re: Over/Under
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:03 pm
by ndlionsfan
Yeah, they played last year either in the dist champ or the regional 3rd place game (maybe both) and I know we had an over/under for that game as well, but it didn't live up to the expectations as far as scoring.
Love the username by the way!