MTfan4life wrote:There are other zones possible to use. Put a 1-3-1 on. Plankers simply would have had to occupy the the paint and the zone allows for perimeter defense. Also, I'd rather have Plankers playing lax defense on OG's five man and the other four defending tightly, over playing 2-3 and allowing so many wide-open outside shots. All I know is I've seen Kindred play multiple times over the last couple years, and I still have yet to walk away thinking "the game plan/coaching tonight was pretty good."
Run4Fun2009 wrote:
True...I think they did go to a 1-2-2 zone occasionally during the game...but that didn't stop OG from hitting open shots. Carter Kretchman's dribble up 3 midway through the 1st quarter was the 3 that started it all for Oak Grove (gutsy shot for a freshman )
All-in-All...what a great night of basketball at the Civic Center.
EHS1998 wrote:Final
Linton Hazelton Moffit Braddock 65
Lamoure 48
NDplayin wrote:Does anyone know what's going on up there in Region 8 with Ray? These situations happen sometimes and often it is due to the return of previously injured or inelligible player(s). Is that the case, or is Ray simply making a tremendous run? Either way, it is still quite the accomplishment.
thewanderer wrote:EHS1998 wrote:Final
Linton Hazelton Moffit Braddock 65
Lamoure 48
biggest upset of the Regions so far. EHS1998, i assume you were at the game. How did it play out. who were the key players, factors, etc? Lamoure overated?
EHS1998 wrote:thewanderer wrote:EHS1998 wrote:Final
Linton Hazelton Moffit Braddock 65
Lamoure 48
biggest upset of the Regions so far. EHS1998, i assume you were at the game. How did it play out. who were the key players, factors, etc? Lamoure overated?
Lamoure just didnt play very well, due in large part to LHMB. Losing a player like Zach Stemen (one of the top overal post payers in the State, in my opinion.) definately hurt them on both ends of the floor and with depth. This is not an excuse, its a reality. But take nothing away from LHMB, Carr had a great game plan and they executed well. One thing I notice about LHMB over the years is they almost always seems to have role players raise their games in key situations, Cody Sehn was one of those players yesterday as an example, and there are others like Weisser and Dralle. Tomorrow's game vs Napoleon could be a classic.
NoIinTeam wrote:MTfan4life,
About the CC-MV game and no call at the end of the game. I've heard since that play from different people that the rule is it can be called a foul but there would no longer be free throws because the ball was not in play yet. Not sure but I guess it's a new rule.
thewanderer wrote:EHS1998 wrote:thewanderer wrote:EHS1998 wrote:Final
Linton Hazelton Moffit Braddock 65
Lamoure 48
biggest upset of the Regions so far. EHS1998, i assume you were at the game. How did it play out. who were the key players, factors, etc? Lamoure overated?
Lamoure just didnt play very well, due in large part to LHMB. Losing a player like Zach Stemen (one of the top overal post payers in the State, in my opinion.) definately hurt them on both ends of the floor and with depth. This is not an excuse, its a reality. But take nothing away from LHMB, Carr had a great game plan and they executed well. One thing I notice about LHMB over the years is they almost always seems to have role players raise their games in key situations, Cody Sehn was one of those players yesterday as an example, and there are others like Weisser and Dralle. Tomorrow's game vs Napoleon could be a classic.
what happened to Zach Stemen
MNTwinsFan wrote:NoIinTeam wrote:MTfan4life,
About the CC-MV game and no call at the end of the game. I've heard since that play from different people that the rule is it can be called a foul but there would no longer be free throws because the ball was not in play yet. Not sure but I guess it's a new rule.
I believe that was a foul and a 1 and 1 should have been shot. I think the way you mentioned it (FT not being administered) pertains to college and not high school.
NDplayin wrote:Does anyone know what's going on up there in Region 8 with Ray? These situations happen sometimes and often it is due to the return of previously injured or inelligible player(s). Is that the case, or is Ray simply making a tremendous run? Either way, it is still quite the accomplishment.
NoIinTeam wrote:MTfan4life,
About the CC-MV game and no call at the end of the game. I've heard since that play from different people that the rule is it can be called a foul but there would no longer be free throws because the ball was not in play yet. Not sure but I guess it's a new rule.
boomgoesthedynamite wrote:MNTwinsFan wrote:NoIinTeam wrote:MTfan4life,
About the CC-MV game and no call at the end of the game. I've heard since that play from different people that the rule is it can be called a foul but there would no longer be free throws because the ball was not in play yet. Not sure but I guess it's a new rule.
I believe that was a foul and a 1 and 1 should have been shot. I think the way you mentioned it (FT not being administered) pertains to college and not high school.
There was a rule change for this season so no FT's would have been shot on a dead ball foul. Just confirmed that with 2 Class B coaches and and AD
nduser1 wrote:MNTwinsFan - I believe like stated before the ball "must be in play" and in the Kindred/Oak Grove game the ball WAS in play. It was not in the CCHS / MV game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests