woodchuck10 wrote:I agree! The numbers we have don't work for an 8 region 16 district class B. It should be something like 4 regions and 12 districts. Each district would have 8 or 9 teams. Top 4 goto the regional, so a 48 team single elimination tourney to crown a champion. Instead of 8 team "state" we could have a final four.
ReadyToPlay wrote:Just to add to my post, the districts that get to play ball while super region teams are sitting are posted on Runs district tournaments post. These districts are #5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,15,16. And guess what? They start Feb 24 and go through Feb 27. This coincidently is the dead time for super region teams..As Trump would say," sad, very sad"...
ReadyToPlay wrote:Totally just an example only. Just saying that any lesser team in a given region could have had their best player out or the flu bug hits a team during some crucial games during the regular season, and if there were to be a double elimination pre-regional tournament, a team could show their true potential, gelling in this pre-tournament and all of the sudden they make the Regional tournament. But since this idea of a double elimination pre-region tournament would never fly, I am concurring with a lot of the posts yesterday of at least having a one day play in tournament at one given site on a Friday (Saturday weather backup) before Regional tournament.
classbman wrote:Agree with you Ready to Play. These athletes work hard all year to get to that "Bigger Venue". Have all the play in games where the tourney is played. Let all the players in the region get there.
The Schwab wrote:In my opinion if you have a super region play in game you should reward the teams that earned the better seed with a home game. I understand that for fans and media, one neutral location would be idea, but then again not all of the region tournaments are played on a neutral floor the way it is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests