Eminence wrote:If it is refs are close to fair, I say South by 10. If not, Jamestown by 15. We'll see what their foul count is this time.
dgfsuperfan1 wrote:Eminence wrote:If it is refs are close to fair, I say South by 10. If not, Jamestown by 15. We'll see what their foul count is this time.
It was not the fouls that were called, it was the ones that were not called.
bruins44 wrote:dgfsuperfan1 wrote:Eminence wrote:If it is refs are close to fair, I say South by 10. If not, Jamestown by 15. We'll see what their foul count is this time.
It was not the fouls that were called, it was the ones that were not called.
Now I know why Mandan lost at Jemestown, every call down the stretch vs South went the Jays way. Two of the three refs were Jamestown High grads and the other coaches at the college.
it was a good close game between two good teams, but when something is called on one end of the floor and not on the other it makes you wonder?
nd-ball41 wrote:bruins44 wrote:dgfsuperfan1 wrote:Eminence wrote:If it is refs are close to fair, I say South by 10. If not, Jamestown by 15. We'll see what their foul count is this time.
It was not the fouls that were called, it was the ones that were not called.
Now I know why Mandan lost at Jemestown, every call down the stretch vs South went the Jays way. Two of the three refs were Jamestown High grads and the other coaches at the college.
it was a good close game between two good teams, but when something is called on one end of the floor and not on the other it makes you wonder?
You also have to tell more of the story...South missed about 4 or 5 layups in the last couple minutes in the game, and they had so many opportunities to put Jamestown away, but just didn't finish. You can't blame it on the refs. They don't make shots for you.
Eminence wrote:You would need to see more than just the last 3 minutes. They did put Jamestown on the line a lot. There was a no call at one end and then the next play, Jamestown went over and back before the push and they gave Jamestown the freethrows. FS had it's chances to win but there was some no calls.
dgfsuperfan1 wrote:Eminence wrote:You would need to see more than just the last 3 minutes. They did put Jamestown on the line a lot. There was a no call at one end and then the next play, Jamestown went over and back before the push and they gave Jamestown the freethrows. FS had it's chances to win but there was some no calls.
The refs at this game could be heard cheering on the Jamestown players. I was at the game sitting behind the scoring tables and heard them giving encouragement to the Jamestown players.
Eminence wrote:nd-ball41 wrote:bruins44 wrote:dgfsuperfan1 wrote:Eminence wrote:If it is refs are close to fair, I say South by 10. If not, Jamestown by 15. We'll see what their foul count is this time.
It was not the fouls that were called, it was the ones that were not called.
Now I know why Mandan lost at Jemestown, every call down the stretch vs South went the Jays way. Two of the three refs were Jamestown High grads and the other coaches at the college.
it was a good close game between two good teams, but when something is called on one end of the floor and not on the other it makes you wonder?
You also have to tell more of the story...South missed about 4 or 5 layups in the last couple minutes in the game, and they had so many opportunities to put Jamestown away, but just didn't finish. You can't blame it on the refs. They don't make shots for you.
Did they miss them or we're they fouled on the shot? There is a lot of cooking going on in Jamestown.
Eminence wrote:Talking to a player verse Cheering one on is two different things. dgfsuperfan1 was there so it's not hearsay. Refs are suppose to be impartial and fair.
I think it is getting worse in high school sports. Winning at any cost actually hurts a team. This is why the first post in this blog is asking for Strengths and Weaknesses. When you stage a game, YOU DON'T KNOW. Meanwhile, other teams know and are working on their strengths and weaknesses.
As long as schools pick their own refs, i don't think it will change!
Hinsa wrote:I refereed for 10 years, worked district and regional games as well. And to avoid ever being in the middle of the kind of discussion that is going on here, I NEVER worked a game that my home town was playing in. It is humanly impossible to remain completely objective when reffing your home town. If anything, I would have called more on my home town just to ensure that I was not favoring them.
Thus, a policy of not reffing your home town should be standard. That being said, in larger towns, that is almost impossible because your pool of officials is the largest in the larger towns, so you hire the referees that are in town.
I will say this: referees DO NOT WIN OR LOSE GAMES. Players do. Players make and miss shots, players turn the ball over, players make good/bad decisions, players decide the game. They need to play well enough to overcome anything that happens on the floor, including mistakes by officials and the officiating style.
Now, back to discussion on the Blue Jays.....
EDC wrote:Great win for Jamestown but a long ways to go. I think Jamestown will continue to get better and better. Will somebody list their starters and next few off the bench? Strengths, Weaknesses? I think the town of Jamestown will rally behind this team and it will be a crazy ride! Looks like the Jays have adjusted well to the WDA.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests