roundem6 wrote:1. stats
2. the fact that he is 6'8" in North Dakota.
3. I have seen him play about 5 times.
1. stats are easily comparable.
2. irrelevant, many reasons why it is irrelevant, kind of self explanatory and I am getting the sense you know next to nothing. just an example: justin shock is 6'8" from west fargo and he has done nothing compared to BK.
3. A rowdy crowd leader at North, who most likely plays zero sports, has seen him 5x? how may i ask? And even if you have, I would venture to say that you probably wouldn't be the best evaluator on a good player. Everytime you compare players you talk about stats and stats only. Stats dont tell the whole picture.