North Dakota Preps

is Joe getting any other college looks better than Gonzaga? Like in a power conference? Because if Dufault can start in the Big 12, then Hanstad easily can. Granted Gonzaga is much better than Colorado.

Yes. Yes.

Colorado was at the Century-Dickinson game.

Alot is going to depend on this year's AAU season. Unfortunately college coaches have been focusing on that season because there is better competition.

balla45 wrote:Yes. Yes.

Colorado was at the Century-Dickinson game.

Well, I'm sure he impressed the scouts with that performance. His pull up is outstanding.

KiNg LeBrOn wrote:

balla45 wrote:Yes. Yes.

Colorado was at the Century-Dickinson game.

Well, I'm sure he impressed the scouts with that performance. His pull up is outstanding.

you can say that again

his pull up is outstanding. ha

KiNg LeBrOn wrote:is Joe getting any other college looks better than Gonzaga? Like in a power conference? Because if Dufault can start in the Big 12, then Hanstad easily can. Granted Gonzaga is much better than Colorado.

That is for sure Hansted is better than Defualt was and if Hansteds scholarship still continues i think he would be a great 6th man or maybe at best a starter.

roundem6 wrote:Almost as good as Savageau if you know how Nik is doing.

Give it up roundem, after watching Savageau play today, there is no way he is even considered on the same level as Hanstad. Hanstad is on his own level. Compare his performance against Century at WDA with Nik's today.... Nik is on the level with Schreiner and BK. Don't be stubborn about it

Hanstad has also played them 3 times, first meeting for Savageau.

roundem6 wrote:Hanstad has also played them 3 times, first meeting for Savageau.

Which should make it easier for him because they aren't familar with his game.

good point. North played like crap in the 2nd half. Lucky they advanced.

Indy5 wrote:

roundem6 wrote:Hanstad has also played them 3 times, first meeting for Savageau.

Which should make it easier for him because they aren't familar with his game.

Exactly, playing him more gives them a better of slowing him down or figuring him out...

Thought about it after I said it haha.

KiNg LeBrOn wrote:

Indy5 wrote:

roundem6 wrote:Hanstad has also played them 3 times, first meeting for Savageau.

Which should make it easier for him because they aren't familar with his game.

Exactly, playing him more gives them a better of slowing him down or figuring him out...

Yes if you have been to his game against Jamestown when he dropped 36 he hit over 40% from the 3 point line and he shot about 7 of them THAT IS CRAZY!!!!!!!

Raider Fan wrote:

KiNg LeBrOn wrote:

Indy5 wrote:

roundem6 wrote:Hanstad has also played them 3 times, first meeting for Savageau.

Which should make it easier for him because they aren't familar with his game.

Exactly, playing him more gives them a better of slowing him down or figuring him out...

Yes if you have been to his game against Jamestown when he dropped 36 he hit over 40% from the 3 point line and he shot about 7 of them THAT IS CRAZY!!!!!!!

Just because Nik had one bad game isnt an argument for why Hanstad is better. I know that Hanstad is a better player, but give me a break, every player has bad games.
Raidersfan, that is a terrible example. I am sure Hanstad does that many many times a year. And so does Nik. A game against WF earlier this year, Nik made 5 threes in a row, all within a span of 2-3 minutes. The last two were back to back plays in a row, both from further than NBA range.

how good of an offer is this kid going to get ... how does he do in aau/eci

roundem6 wrote:good point. North played like crap in the 2nd half. Lucky they advanced.

maybe not so lucky they advanced..? woulda saved them an embarrassing 42 point loss to Bismarck in the semis

The game should have been much closer but its hard to win a game 1 on 5. Nik was the only player to show up for North and that just isn't going to cut it with a team like Bis which showed. When one player scores 31 of the teams 52 points not to mention 22 of the teams 30 in the second half there is no way they are going to win that game. But in the end even if North played the best ball they have all year i still believe they would have lost but it would have been single digits.

The game should have been much closer but its hard to win a game 1 on 5. Nik was the only player to show up for North and that just isn't going to cut it with a team like Bis which showed. When one player scores 31 of the teams 52 points not to mention 22 of the teams 30 in the second half there is no way they are going to win that game. But in the end even if North played the best ball they have all year i still believe they would have lost but it would have been single digits.