senser wrote:If ifs and buts were candies and nuts we'd all have a very merry christmas.
I can almost assure you one thing, Savageau on Dickinson would up the stats for all the players around him and they would still be a state calibur team.
I'm not taking anything away from Hanstad, the kid is a baller. It's just a shame that people don't recognize the same in Savageau.
InsideMan wrote:Joe is the best. Look at where he is going to go to college compared to where nik is going. College coaches bet their livelihood on who is going to be a better player.
Can we please leave Kilpinski out of this conversation. PLEASE!!?
senser wrote:Hanstad is a great talent. He's a legitimate D1 player and the best thing I've seen in ND since Boschee, although he isn't on Boschee's level at Valley City. I don't get a chance to see much class B so I can't comment on those kids.
I've seen them both play a few times this year. Hanstad is easily a better talent, but Nick is the better high school player in what he does for his team. You take Savageau out of the equation and North has a bunch of descent players at best. I don't care what the numbers say of the role players, the North supporting cast around Savageau isn't anything good by any means. You put him in and they are a legitimate championship contender, unarguably moreso than Dickinson. JMHO.
senser wrote:Hanstad is a great talent. He's a legitimate D1 player and the best thing I've seen in ND since Boschee, although he isn't on Boschee's level at Valley City. I don't get a chance to see much class B so I can't comment on those kids.
I've seen them both play a few times this year. Hanstad is easily a better talent, but Nick is the better high school player in what he does for his team. You take Savageau out of the equation and North has a bunch of descent players at best. I don't care what the numbers say of the role players, the North supporting cast around Savageau isn't anything good by any means. You put him in and they are a legitimate championship contender, unarguably moreso than Dickinson. JMHO.
roundem6 wrote:And senser also said that the supporting cast isnt as good as you think, if you watched North all year you would understand why Schultz averages what he does.
roundem6 wrote:No it makes Joe the better "college talent" but like senser also said, I think Nik would make Dickinson better than Joe can since he runs the floor.
roundem6 wrote:Bergeron got an all-conference award, but I think most would feel he wasnt completely deserving, you would agree if you knew the East. I will also point out that maybe Akers and Wehri were all-EDC thanks to Sav. A high % of both their shots were assisted by Savageau.
roundem6 wrote:Im not taking anything away from those 2, they are solid players. Akers is one of the smartest basketball players you'll ever meet. Nik helped their cause is what I am trying to say.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests