baseball fan wrote:I agree those are some good players "lost" I would not include Pitia in that mix as he has not done anything even close to what the others have and would be average at best at either school.
GFRR99 wrote:baseball fan wrote:I agree those are some good players "lost" I would not include Pitia in that mix as he has not done anything even close to what the others have and would be average at best at either school.
although peter hasnt been doing as good as most would have thought, in my opinion he would still be one of the best player on south and would have started for them the past 2 years. calling peter average compared to the players playing south the past 2 years is just plain dumb. north has had more quality players and that has limited peter's time. he plays his role and does a good job off the bench.
however i dont think mclachlans transfer to north has paid off because he didnt get any playing time last year and has a very very limited role this year. but i think he did it cause peter and nik were his best friends
teamramrod wrote:GFRR99 wrote:baseball fan wrote:I agree those are some good players "lost" I would not include Pitia in that mix as he has not done anything even close to what the others have and would be average at best at either school.
although peter hasnt been doing as good as most would have thought, in my opinion he would still be one of the best player on south and would have started for them the past 2 years. calling peter average compared to the players playing south the past 2 years is just plain dumb. north has had more quality players and that has limited peter's time. he plays his role and does a good job off the bench.
however i dont think mclachlans transfer to north has paid off because he didnt get any playing time last year and has a very very limited role this year. but i think he did it cause peter and nik were his best friends
i agree with everything you said about peter, he is a solid player that plays real good d and can shoot the three. but mclachlan has been going 2 north schools since elementary school so he never transfered and i think the sav transfer had more to do with the headcoaches then his best friends
groundblind wrote:I agree the Davies thing will impact South, but don't count them out as a quality team next year. They have a very strong junior class that has consistently been one of the best in EDC as freshman and sophomores. Time will tell if the coach will start to let some of the juniors get any playing time. History shows that he plays his seniors regardless of ability. (Some of this year's seniors would be better had they gotten meaningful minutes on varsity last year.)
i am legend wrote:groundblind wrote:I agree the Davies thing will impact South, but don't count them out as a quality team next year. They have a very strong junior class that has consistently been one of the best in EDC as freshman and sophomores. Time will tell if the coach will start to let some of the juniors get any playing time. History shows that he plays his seniors regardless of ability. (Some of this year's seniors would be better had they gotten meaningful minutes on varsity last year.)
well there not very good this year, so how are they going to be that good when they lose players to another school?
bruins44 wrote:i am legend wrote:groundblind wrote:I agree the Davies thing will impact South, but don't count them out as a quality team next year. They have a very strong junior class that has consistently been one of the best in EDC as freshman and sophomores. Time will tell if the coach will start to let some of the juniors get any playing time. History shows that he plays his seniors regardless of ability. (Some of this year's seniors would be better had they gotten meaningful minutes on varsity last year.)
well there not very good this year, so how are they going to be that good when they lose players to another school?
This years Junior class will all play at South next year, its this years sophomore class that will be split between South and Davies. South does have a good group of Juniors.
Home Run wrote:If you follow my posts, I having constantly tried to promote Fargo South as a legitimate contender. However, their continued struggles are a concern. Again, I live too far away to be in the know. Therefore could someone please explain to me which current junior players from South are in the rotation? To my knowledge, it is mostly a senior rotation. Or, at the very least, the seniors are the focal players of this year's team? Or am I incorrect with this assessment?
The reason that I ask is if the juniors are pretty good then why don't they see more time. I am not seeking an answer that blames the coach, philosophy, or program, but rather what evidence is there that the Fargo South junior class will be fairly competitive next year providing more optimism from the South fan base
Last question, can North Dakota coaches work with their players during the summer months? For example, Minnesota allows their coaches to work with their players as long as they want with the exception of the July 4th week. Can this same type of practice be employed by North Dakota coaches? If so, do quite a few of the coaches follow this trend?
Apologies for the long and somewhat random posts. Thanks for any input that may be provided to an inquiring fan from afar of North Dakota.
Home Run wrote:South lost to an ever improving Moorhead team tonight by a score of 86 to 68. Players scoring for South were as follows: T. Poss 21, Shaw 14, Okland 11, McGillis 7, Parker 4, Deng 4, Kazane 3, Skonseng 2, Larson 2. Not a bad loss considering Moorhead is starting to play much better.?
ndbasketballfan007 wrote:Fargo South is a improved team that has some kids that can score.
teamramrod wrote:from what ive seen of wawers play he isn't really a scorer hes much more of a solid role player, he plays good d an can handle the ball just never goes to the basket. and rutter i'm not surprised he has been going scoreless, okland should be playing more over him and looking like he might be. its a good moorhead team they played so i wouldnt take the loss so heavily. should be interesting to see how they fair against north next week
Home Run wrote:teamramrod wrote:from what ive seen of wawers play he isn't really a scorer hes much more of a solid role player, he plays good d an can handle the ball just never goes to the basket. and rutter i'm not surprised he has been going scoreless, okland should be playing more over him and looking like he might be. its a good moorhead team they played so i wouldnt take the loss so heavily. should be interesting to see how they fair against north next week
No sarcasm intended in any way. Just curious why the change of heart from less than a week ago. This message seems more positive about South and their future then your most recent post. Again, just seeking your input and clarification.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests