North Dakota Preps • View topic

by **truplaya** » Sat May 27, 2006 4:35 pm

1 dickonson

2 mandan

3 bismark

4 williston

5 minot

6 belcourt

7century

8 jamestown

9 st marys(win less season)

it will be a very close race in the top 4

by **Ming01** » Mon May 29, 2006 12:33 pm

1. Dickinson
2. BHS
3. Minot
4. Belcourt
5. Mandan
6. Williston
7. Century
8. Jamestown
9. St. Mary's(I'm switching them down to 9th they may not even have any Seniors come out next season)

by **ndplayer** » Mon May 29, 2006 2:01 pm

1. Dickinson
2. BHS
3. Mandan
4. Minot
5. Williston
6. Century
7. Belcourt
8. Jamestown
9. St. Mary's

by **truplaya** » Mon May 29, 2006 8:56 pm

Ming01 wrote:1. Dickinson
2. BHS
3. Minot
4. Belcourt
5. Mandan
6. Williston
7. Century
8. St. Mary's
9. Jamestown

belcourt needs a coach to be that high

by **Ming01** » Mon May 29, 2006 8:57 pm

Belcourt can be as good as they want to be and once they realize next year they have a fine team, they will want to come out and play ball.

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:22 am

belcourt always thinks there good

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:33 am

Bismarck
Dickinson
Williston
I see the 4-8 spot coming to be a battle between-Mandan,Minot,Jamestown,Belcourt,Century

[/*]
9. St. Marys

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:36 am

with belovek and mauer having nothin to lose and them playing how they want expect mandan to be a threat with them too

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:39 am

Every team should be playing like they have nothing to lose. Jamestown had 9 seniors coming up with over half of them with good varsity experience. By your theory, they should be good this year because they have nothing to lose.

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:02 am

but are there palyers good

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:04 am

Yes a couple of them

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:28 am

we will see belovek and mauer are gunna be great mauer has alot to prove personally i think he will be to lazy to do anytihng but oh well we will see

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:30 am

No offense to Maurer, but Heck(Jamestown) will be able to make maurer look like a fool.

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:31 am

i would love to see it he so cocky and ignorant

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:32 am

but to be onest if he trys he would prolly educate him on something serious

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:37 am

ndbb wrote:No offense to Maurer, but Heck(Jamestown) will be able to make maurer look like a fool.

i dont even know heck who is this kid

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:38 am

http://www2.edutech.nodak.edu/edcbb/Boys/stats.html Just check out that leaderboard and you'll see what he did.

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:41 am

12 and 5 i bet he was a starter though

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:42 am

just wait and see

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:42 am

he started half of the games.

by **truplaya** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:43 am

mauer just so lazy its rediculous

by **cdub1** » Tue May 30, 2006 10:08 am

sorry to say but what Heck did wasnt amazing or even incredibly good by any meausre.

by **ndbb** » Tue May 30, 2006 2:01 pm

true, but considering he was a junior and only started half the games of the season it sure isnt bad.

by **Saas25** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:04 pm

Personally Mauer isn't even good. All he can do is dunk. We doesn't he skip playing high school bball and go try out for And one or something. Stop talking the kid up so much when all he can do is dunk, because he is cocky and lazy and all he cares about is dunking

by **jrh22** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:05 pm

I agree about Mauer. He should just play the game instead of trying to have 1 amazing play and 10 turnovers. He ain't no KOBE.

1. DHS

2. WHS

3. BHS

4. Minot

5. Century

6. Mandan

7-9. Who cares

wda

Who is online