Page 4 of 5

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:09 pm
by SiouxUND
Ha, ok landon rachel will light up mauer.  Or Brandon Dale.  Or Tom Roemmich.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:47 pm
by ballplayer15
SiouxUND wrote:Ha, ok landon rachel will light up mauer.  Or Brandon Dale.  Or Tom Roemmich.

who are they

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:10 am
by vikes_fan
Mandan will beat jamestown tommorrow night.  The blue jays may win 1 or 2 games this year and they will be agains St. Marys if that.  I just think Mandan will have the better team tommorrow night. Not saying that Mandan is going to go all the way this year but i do believe they do have the potential to be in the Top 3 or 4 in the WDA, and that all depends on how their Head Coach lets them play.  Not hating on Coach Miller but Mandan should have a had a good team last year also but he slows them down to much. They started out what 3-1 or 4-1 or something like that then he never let them run anymore like the were and the ended up 8-16 or something.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:12 am
by cdub1
thenextbigthing wrote:
SiouxUND wrote:Ha, ok landon rachel will light up mauer.  Or Brandon Dale.  Or Tom Roemmich.

who are they

nobody has heard of any of these people and you still cant stop belohlavek

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:30 am
by nd-ball41
cdub1 wrote:
thenextbigthing wrote:
SiouxUND wrote:Ha, ok landon rachel will light up mauer.  Or Brandon Dale.  Or Tom Roemmich.

who are they

nobody has heard of any of these people and you still cant stop belohlavek

why can't they...has anyone in the west seen jamestown's team lately? The team they put on the court to start last year could have been beat by the jv team

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 2:12 pm
by ballplayer15
maurer talks alot but the kid can play thats for sure we will all see tommorow night though

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:52 pm
by nd-ball41
thenextbigthing wrote:maurer talks alot but the kid can play thats for sure we will all see tommorow night though

you are correct my dear sir..it's going down tomorrow night

PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:52 pm
by vikes_fan
And boy let me tell u it went down Mandan over Jamestown 84-66 not even a close game at all

PostPosted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:52 pm
by vikes_fan
jamestown came within i believe 8 or 9 was the closest down the stretch it was 45-34 at halftime

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:01 am
by #50mandan
alls i gotta say is who saw belohlavek jam on that one kid? amazing

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:52 am
by NDdominator
all I gotta say is mandan will lose to belcourt both times lose to all st. mary's once and end up under .500 because they are MANDAN maybe make it to state if they do they will lose out like last time because they are MANDAN they have a good team once and a great awhile when a they can ride the coattails of a good player never will they be a good team

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:01 am
by vikes_fan
NDdominator wrote:all I gotta say is mandan will lose to belcourt both times lose to all st. mary's once and end up under .500 because they are MANDAN maybe make it to state if they do they will lose out like last time because they are MANDAN they have a good team once and a great awhile when a they can ride the coattails of a good player never will they be a good team


 MANDAN will beat Belcourt in Mandan and the only way the lose is in belcourt is because Belcourt always gets the calls in their gym. And no they wont lose to St Marys and the will finish over .500 percent and they have a good team this year they will play well

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:30 am
by ndbb
the score was deceiving, jamestown had it down to 5 within 10 minutes of the second half.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:49 pm
by ballplayer15
ndbb wrote:the score was deceiving, jamestown had it down to 5 within 10 minutes of the second half.

yah it was they should of lost by 30 or more but there hole starting 5 was in foul trouble all game by very very loopside reffing and not to mention terrible calls jamestown is not a very good team at all

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:51 pm
by O_Snap
Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:39 pm
by ndbb
O_Snap wrote:Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

21 points.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:42 pm
by O_Snap
Yeah I know he had 21 points which is a good game but his style just doesn't impress me but i guess if he puts up that ppg it must work

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:21 pm
by rep
O_Snap wrote:Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

i think heck is good, he did finish with 20-some points (can't remember the exact total)...use what god gave you

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:08 pm
by NDdominator
HA, no they will not maybe a game over .500 if that double digits in the loss column guaranteed they are decent not the worst team in the state but near the bottom of the barrel

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:03 am
by nd-ball41
rep wrote:
O_Snap wrote:Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

i think heck is good, he did finish with 20-some points (can't remember the exact total)...use what god gave you

heck dropped 37 last night vs. valley city...so ya i think heck is pretty darn good

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:07 am
by threeball
nd-ball41 wrote:
rep wrote:
O_Snap wrote:Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

i think heck is good, he did finish with 20-some points (can't remember the exact total)...use what god gave you

heck dropped 37 last night vs. valley city...so ya i think heck is pretty darn good

Im pretty sure valley city is not good at all.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:22 am
by vikes_fan
threeball wrote:
nd-ball41 wrote:
rep wrote:
O_Snap wrote:Yeah the calls were ridiculous against Mandan.  And who thinks Heck is even that good??? He looked nothing special Tuesday night Kinda just uses his weight thats about it.

i think heck is good, he did finish with 20-some points (can't remember the exact total)...use what god gave you

heck dropped 37 last night vs. valley city...so ya i think heck is pretty darn good

Im pretty sure valley city is not good at all.
exactly

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:51 pm
by ballplayer15
actually there terrible

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:26 pm
by ndbb
its pathetic how you kids think no one is at the standard of mandan basketball. I mean you guys think Maurer is going to be all-state I believe someone said at one point. He has scored 10 and 7 points in his first two games.  You guys think Jamestown is just worthless, and he didn't even put up amazing numbers against them, he shot 5-6, big deal. 

Then after the game, you guys still claim that the reffing was one sided because the fouls were 23-16 or something like that, it isnt even that big of a margin differential. 

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:16 pm
by vikes_fan
Were you at the Mandan Jamestown game or did you just read about it in the paper??. Do you know how many times heck shot????  I dont know just curious