Mandan girls vs Class A boys

by **FargoHottie15** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 11:00 am

Could the Mandan girls this year beaten ANY of the class A boys teams? or at least come close?

by **Ming01** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 11:52 am

maybe valley city.

by **postalservice** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 11:57 am

lol, that's pretty fun. I'm gonna say, no not even close to anyone.

by **ndbb** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:28 pm

by **RedWings7** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:30 pm

not a chance.. you have got to be kidding me fargohottie...the worst a boys team would be the mandan girls by 30, no doubt about it

by **Ming01** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:31 pm

yeah you cant compare girls teams to boys teams.

by **ndbb** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:32 pm

a girls team would be out muscled and more than likely out ran too.

by **FargoHottie15** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:43 pm

i saw st mary's play this year...wow....they would beat the mandan team, but not by as much as some would think

by **Ming01** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:44 pm

come on lets get real now.

by **Saucesauer** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:13 pm

i am gunna say yes they could probly beat about 1/2 he boys teams they have more faciel hair than half the boys teams they are men

by **Wild Wolves** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:27 pm

Don't be mad because they won't date you.

On topic: My cousin goes to NDSU, he plays with a group of guys who scrimmage the womens team on a regular basis. He did not get offered a college scholarship to play BB anywhere but he was a pretty good BB player. He stated that they beat the women about 75% of the time. None of these men/boys were offered college scholarships. I hope that adds some insight into the discussion.

Sauce play nice.

by **#50mandan** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:22 pm

[user=463]Saucesauer[/user] who are you to say our girls have more facial hair than half the boys teams? Man, at least they can touch the net unlike some people.

by **ndbb** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:31 pm

Sauce, are you sayin they are on beaver tranquilizers?

by **huskers** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:39 pm

i think that mandan would hold their own against a few boys teams, not saying they would win, but it wouldn't be a blowout, they would definitely give st. marys, valley city, and jamestown a game.

by **Saucesauer** » Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:18 pm

iam sayin that their girls have more facial hair than most men 1/2of the boys basketball players wont get scholorships and some teams wont have any players get scholorships mandan girls basketball is utter dominance they could beat some boys teams

by **Wild Wolves** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:21 am

Jon play nice!

by **ndbb** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:36 am

No way they could beat st. marys, jamestown, or valley city. Boys are way more athletic.

by **Saucesauer** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:43 am

no way you an even say that wasnt vally city like 0-17 especially if it was last years team with 2 kelpinskies and rodgers i think they would beat some teams you think it would be no contest because you play for these boys teams and you would be embarrassed to admidt it so yo just say no way but i say way

by **Ming01** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:32 pm

girls bball is way different then guys, you cant compare.

by **Saucesauer** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:10 pm

than y are we

by **ndbb** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:11 pm

good question.

by **magic715** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:47 pm

FargoHottie15 wrote:Could the Mandan girls this year beaten ANY of the class A boys teams? or at least come close?

I know know girls team could beat any boys class A team , i even doubt they could beat a Class B team that had a 6 or more wins, boys are just faster and stronger, I know Mandan is a fantastic team, but a 6'3 girl like keilpinski or however tall she is still cant compete with a 6' to 6'3 half way athletic boy from classB , and even some of the lower half of class B has at least one athletic player. Now if you were to have a freethrow shooting or 3 point shooting contest, i think the girls are as good or better than boys, they concentrate better, and usually have better mechanics.

by **cdub1** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 5:47 pm

the mandan girls are good but only rogers really has the quickness and shot to be effective against a boys team

by **demonfan74** » Sat May 20, 2006 6:52 am

cdub1 wrote:the mandan girls are good but only rogers really has the quickness and shot to be effective against a boys team

i don't agree. put her up against some defense like ryan dressler or any other defensive stud on the team and she would get her pocket picked all day long. not to mention she's 5'6" and would get her shot blocked by these guys with 30+ verticles. you just can't compare girls to guys - it's not even close.

by **cdub1** » Sat May 20, 2006 3:21 pm

I have seen Rogers cross many guys over at open gyms and she is much taller than 5 6 also. She has a legimate jumpshot and one of the best handles in the bis-man area.

Mandan girls vs Class A boys

Who is online