gonzaga wrote:I think is was absoutlely demeaning to post the scoring results for the Mr. Basketball voting. It served no purpose and I would imagine would be very embarrasing for people who should have be proud of what they accomplished in their career. Who really cares who was actually 2nd -last. No purpose except to diminish what was accomplished..
I could not believe that either of the Packineaus was not a Mr. Basketball candidate, the combination of Packineaus and Young Bird would have been Class A material at most schools. Gamers that is what those boys are. What a thrill to watch them play.
gonzaga wrote:I think is was absoutlely demeaning to post the scoring results for the Mr. Basketball voting. It served no purpose and I would imagine would be very embarrasing for people who should have be proud of what they accomplished in their career. Who really cares who was actually 2nd -last. No purpose except to diminish what was accomplished..
I could not believe that either of the Packineaus was not a Mr. Basketball candidate, the combination of Packineaus and Young Bird would have been Class A material at most schools. Gamers that is what those boys are. What a thrill to watch them play.
cdub1 wrote:gonzaga wrote:I think is was absoutlely demeaning to post the scoring results for the Mr. Basketball voting. It served no purpose and I would imagine would be very embarrasing for people who should have be proud of what they accomplished in their career. Who really cares who was actually 2nd -last. No purpose except to diminish what was accomplished..
I could not believe that either of the Packineaus was not a Mr. Basketball candidate, the combination of Packineaus and Young Bird would have been Class A material at most schools. Gamers that is what those boys are. What a thrill to watch them play.
me personally if i wuz up for mr basketball and got 1 vote i would be thrilled and would want everyone to know about it
If you are not allowed to throw your own hat into the Mr. Basketball ring and you are placed their by others to honor you, then I think simply telling us who won is enough said. Most things in life are done on a need to know basis, and this we did not need to know.
gonzaga wrote:I have stated HONESTLY, the right player WON, I am one of the fairest people I know, I am genuinely happy for other people's kids success, I attended both tourneys this year because I like to go and personally congratulate the kids I know that have made it to the BIG SHOW. My ONLY GRIPE is the posting of the voting results, I do not need to know how old someone is, how much they weigh, their religion or political affiliation. I do not think it mattered, I think if it could possibly be a negative, and has no affect on the final results then it should be awarded. There are kids who do not get straight A's on the report cards and I do not want the media to tell me that either, it has a negative connotation. I do realize I am the only one on this forum who feels this way, but I love a good debate.
some FYI
Neil Packineau this year
559 total points 39.8% from 3 pt
20.7 pts per game 73.2% free throws
shot 49% from the field 9.2 rebounds
3.6 steals 1.1 blocks 7.1 Assists
Rudy Young Bird
492 total points 18.2 ppg 62.8 shooting precentage 9.9 rebounds
sportsman20 wrote:gonzaga wrote:I have stated HONESTLY, the right player WON, I am one of the fairest people I know, I am genuinely happy for other people's kids success, I attended both tourneys this year because I like to go and personally congratulate the kids I know that have made it to the BIG SHOW. My ONLY GRIPE is the posting of the voting results, I do not need to know how old someone is, how much they weigh, their religion or political affiliation. I do not think it mattered, I think if it could possibly be a negative, and has no affect on the final results then it should be awarded. There are kids who do not get straight A's on the report cards and I do not want the media to tell me that either, it has a negative connotation. I do realize I am the only one on this forum who feels this way, but I love a good debate.
some FYI
Neil Packineau this year
559 total points 39.8% from 3 pt
20.7 pts per game 73.2% free throws
shot 49% from the field 9.2 rebounds
3.6 steals 1.1 blocks 7.1 Assists
Rudy Young Bird
492 total points 18.2 ppg 62.8 shooting precentage 9.9 rebounds
where did you find those stats? they dont seem correct
klg_11 wrote:does it honestly bother you or is it the fact that it was wilhelm at the bottom. say if it would have been qvale at the bottom and wilhelm at the top. would u be arguing this point HONESTLY!
gonzaga wrote:The voting results are not news, it is strictly opinion. It serves no purpose. Using the score of a basketball game is like apples and oranges. A competition one on one needs a score to determine a winner. It is a fact that a basket went in a hoop, it is not someones opinion on whether or not it would have went in. The only way to determine by actual means and not by statistical means would be to have them play horse and that my friend ,will never happen. We as the public do not have to know every thing about everything. If you are going to publish the nominees results then you should also publish who voted, the criteria used, and there expertise in determing someones else's value. I still think it is demeaning to the other candidates. I think the right player won, that is my opinion, but I do not think we needed to know that he crushed all the other candidates.. Not necessary!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests