State tournament

by **Number7** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:08 pm

The first two match-ups are West 2. Dickinson vs. East 3. West Fargo and West 1. Bismarck vs. East 4. South. What are everyones thoughts? and post other match-ups as they come in

by **#50mandan** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:48 pm

the west will take both of those games with ease, south will have about 30 turnovers against bismarck and west fargo has bad matchups

by **Stromer** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:26 pm

The next two are set as well.

West 3. Williston vs East 2. Shanley and West 4. Minot vs East 1. Devils Lake

by **Number7** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:44 am

#50mandan wrote:the west will take both of those games with ease, south will have about 30 turnovers against bismarck and west fargo has bad matchups

how can you possibly say west fargo doesnt match-up with dickinson? please explain that one

by **cityleaguer** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:33 am

Number7 wrote:
#50mandan wrote:the west will take both of those games with ease, south will have about 30 turnovers against bismarck and west fargo has bad matchups

how can you possibly say west fargo doesnt match-up with dickinson? please explain that one

2 words "TATE KICK"

It's one thing for WDA teams to finally figure him out after a couple games, but going into this matchup blind spells trouble for the Packers. and if not there's plenty of other fire power on that team to back him up.

by **Number7** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:48 am

See you forget Dickinson has seen none of West Fargo either, both teams arent very tall and from what I hear both will attempt to push the ball up the floor. Should be a great game and it will hinge on Seth Dye's ability to work down low and each team's three point shooting

by **iluvbball** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:52 am

Cityleaguer,

You are soooooooooooo cocky about the "Midgets" that it is unbelievable.

It's difficult to even read your comments.

by **biggie** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:49 am

iluvbball wrote:Cityleaguer,

You are soooooooooooo cocky about the "Midgets" that it is unbelievable.

It's difficult to even read your comments.

It's pretty easy to be "cocky" about a team as Dominant as Dickinson.

by **cityleaguer** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:16 am

biggie wrote:
iluvbball wrote:Cityleaguer,

You are soooooooooooo cocky about the "Midgets" that it is unbelievable.

It's difficult to even read your comments.

It's pretty easy to be "cocky" about a team as Dominant as Dickinson.

Thanks Biggie....

I realize I am biased toward the Midgets but that's b/c I too played bball once and know what matchups can win and what it takes to win. On a side note though...I've not only been biased to the Midgets but to the entire West. I've been continuously saying how I think The Coyotes will be a force at state, and how Minot is coming around good with Elgie and Anderson. I dare you to find anyone on this site that isn't a little biased towards their home team?

And I'll stick to what I said "Tate Kick"....and another things "18-4"!!!!!!

by **vikes_fan** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:17 am

biggie wrote:
iluvbball wrote:Cityleaguer,

You are soooooooooooo cocky about the "Midgets" that it is unbelievable.

It's difficult to even read your comments.

It's pretty easy to be "cocky" about a team as Dominant as Dickinson.

I agree with that and i can see all of the west teams sweeping the first round especially Minot too they are shooting lights out right now. I could see a WDA rematch of BHS Dickinson title game, maybe even williston in there if Qvale plays as good as he did in the WDA tourney

State tournament

Who is online