Re: Top teams in high school in 2010
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:11 amTo the above comment about South being the only team in the east that matters, might I refer you to every number one seed ever that hasn't won their division, conference, etc (hint: it's a lot).
To the comments about WF's inexperience in the sophomore class: Has it ever occured to you that maybe there is a little deeper of a reason behind them being so good? Could it maybe be that they were on that traveling team that went to the Babe Ruth World Series a couple years in a row? I don't know about you, but to me that constitutues more experience than most of the high school kids in the state. These guys played against the cream of the crop of the COUNTRY. 'Nouff said.
To the comments about Mandan: yes they are young and have talent, but their future is next year and the year after, not this year (2010).
To the comments about WF's inexperience in the sophomore class: Has it ever occured to you that maybe there is a little deeper of a reason behind them being so good? Could it maybe be that they were on that traveling team that went to the Babe Ruth World Series a couple years in a row? I don't know about you, but to me that constitutues more experience than most of the high school kids in the state. These guys played against the cream of the crop of the COUNTRY. 'Nouff said.
To the comments about Mandan: yes they are young and have talent, but their future is next year and the year after, not this year (2010).