Defender28 wrote:alright I will. Cause unless you didnt notice most of those skill players are leaving. You will have a sub par QB, your running back wont be another Jake Miller, your losing a huge portion of your defense (the portion that almost of your plays) the fact is that BHS is gonna be horribly lacking from wat it has been the last few years. But for the sake of making you who are still playing in high school there, keep telling yourself that you can easily replace those guys.
Indy5 wrote:Defender28 wrote:alright I will. Cause unless you didnt notice most of those skill players are leaving. You will have a sub par QB, your running back wont be another Jake Miller, your losing a huge portion of your defense (the portion that almost of your plays) the fact is that BHS is gonna be horribly lacking from wat it has been the last few years. But for the sake of making you who are still playing in high school there, keep telling yourself that you can easily replace those guys.
Channing Mann won't be another Jake Miller, but he could be the best in the west next year.
purple_drank wrote:BHS defense will be good, but i wouldn't say they have a chance to be the best D is the state. How did that new running back do last year? did he get some touches on JV?
goteam11 wrote:Channing Mann will be the best running back in the state next year. He tore it up last year as a second string and BHS returns four of six on the offensive line.
Defender28 wrote:keller wasnt anything special at TE he was a big body.... he wasnt hard to cover and he just wasnt as dominant as you seem to think. And even if he does outperform my expectations you are gonna need a quarterback to keep the defense honest. You cant run the ball all the time or else the defense is gonna send everyone. The reason BHS's offense was so potent was that teams had to game plan for esley and jake. Esley had the ability to run or make the outstanding throw and Jake was probably more dangerous receiving then running the ball it was intense having to consider and plan for all that in a week's time. Tyson is not even close to the caliber esley is. Esley can run with great effect, Tyson cant. Esley can make all the throws Tyson cant. I is really gonna come down to whether Tyson can shoulder enough of the load to let these touted runningbacks of yours run or not. I just dont see Tyson being able to make that big of a stride going into next year.
I am not totally sure who is all returning for west fargo but Scott Schiller is a beast. That guy does work. Offensively and defensively. If they can add some players around him or return some of there skill guys that team could be a major threat. And with their size it really isnt that hard for West Fargo to reload where the west has to develop talent with the lower numbers.
Defender28 wrote:keller wasnt anything special at TE he was a big body.... he wasnt hard to cover and he just wasnt as dominant as you seem to think. And even if he does outperform my expectations you are gonna need a quarterback to keep the defense honest. You cant run the ball all the time or else the defense is gonna send everyone. The reason BHS's offense was so potent was that teams had to game plan for esley and jake. Esley had the ability to run or make the outstanding throw and Jake was probably more dangerous receiving then running the ball it was intense having to consider and plan for all that in a week's time. Tyson is not even close to the caliber esley is. Esley can run with great effect, Tyson cant. Esley can make all the throws Tyson cant. I is really gonna come down to whether Tyson can shoulder enough of the load to let these touted runningbacks of yours run or not. I just dont see Tyson being able to make that big of a stride going into next year.
I am not totally sure who is all returning for west fargo but Scott Schiller is a beast. That guy does work. Offensively and defensively. If they can add some players around him or return some of there skill guys that team could be a major threat. And with their size it really isnt that hard for West Fargo to reload where the west has to develop talent with the lower numbers.
iluvit wrote:I agree with squeak but the one thing that Tyson does have is arm strength and he can make all the throws. Him and esley as far as arm strenght goes are very comparable. And i know squeak you might not agree with that statement but you only saw him throw when he was a shopmore.
iluvit wrote:I agree with squeak but the one thing that Tyson does have is arm strength and he can make all the throws. Him and esley as far as arm strenght goes are very comparable. And i know squeak you might not agree with that statement but you only saw him throw when he was a shopmore.
Thats accuracy to go with the strong arm. Sounds like both have a strong arm, but Esley is more accurate.squeak63 wrote:i am not bashing tyson by any means with this statement but there is a big difference between throwing the ball 50 yards and throwing the ball 50 yards on a line in a spot where only your receiver has a chance to make a play on it pretty much every single time (were not talking about 1 out of 10 here)
iluvit wrote:And yes i dont realize tyson accuracy is poor and doesnt have great speed like elsey but he will still be one of the top quarterbacks next year. Wait and see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests