Page 1 of 1

Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:07 am
by Run4Fun2009
Friday, September 7th

RV Devils Lake 6 @ #1 Bismarck 40
Jamestown 13 @ Mandan 6
Williston 0 @ #2 Minot 42
#5 Century 20 @ Dickinson 13
West Fargo 41 @ Fargo Davies 7
#4 Fargo South 66 @ Fargo North 7
#3 GF Red River 42 @ GF Central 7

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:42 pm
by go maji
Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (0-1)* @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-1)* @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

YTD 13-4

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:51 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Friday, September 7th

Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (1-1) @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-2) @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

YTD: 15-2

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:06 pm
by koldman18
The only game I would disagree with is the West Fargo @ Fargo Davies game. West Fargo gets put up and up every year and theres nothing to show. West Fargo has gotten weaker since last year and Davies has only gotten stronger with 6 returners on Offence and 9 on Defence.

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:30 pm
by MHSmagi
Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (1-1) @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-2) @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

YTD: 14-3

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:27 pm
by go maji
koldman18 wrote:The only game I would disagree with is the West Fargo @ Fargo Davies game. West Fargo gets put up and up every year and theres nothing to show. West Fargo has gotten weaker since last year and Davies has only gotten stronger with 6 returners on Offence and 9 on Defence.


I'm just going by common opponents.

West Fargo lost to Bismarck by 29
Davies lost to Bismarck by 45

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:57 pm
by Run4Fun2009
go maji wrote:
koldman18 wrote:The only game I would disagree with is the West Fargo @ Fargo Davies game. West Fargo gets put up and up every year and theres nothing to show. West Fargo has gotten weaker since last year and Davies has only gotten stronger with 6 returners on Offence and 9 on Defence.


I'm just going by common opponents.

West Fargo lost to Bismarck by 29
Davies lost to Bismarck by 45


West Fargo has played two of the toughest opponents (L to Bismarck 29-0 and L to Century 29-15)
Fargo Davies has played one tough opponent (L to Bismarck 52-7) and held on against a down opponent in Class AA, IMO (W 21-20 over Shanley). I give West Fargo the edge by 10.

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:28 pm
by Mighty-Mouse
Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (1-1) @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-2) @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

Can't really see any upsets this week unless Davies pulls one out of the hat.

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:56 pm
by lovwatchingsports
Run4Fun2009 wrote:Friday, September 7th

Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (1-1) @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-2) @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:51 am
by koldman18
Devils Lake @ Bismarck: Bismarck easy win
Jamestown @ Mandan: Mandan should have an fairly easy win
Williston @ Minot: Minot easy win
Century @ Dickinson: Century easy win
West Fargo @ Fargo Davies: Davies in a close one
Fargo south @ Fargo North: South easy
GF RR @ GFC: fairly easy GFRR

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:15 pm
by bighouse
Do you really think this weeks schedule is that lop sided?

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:33 pm
by go maji
bighouse wrote:Do you really think this weeks schedule is that lop sided?


Pretty much. With the exeption of West @ Davies, maybe Jamestown @ Mandan. What do you think about this week?

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:17 pm
by topgun23
From what I saw from the mandan devils lake game, mandan should have won that easily. I think the mandan jamestown game should be pretty easy for mandan
And I'm not sure, but wasn't red river supposed to be worst in the east this year?? Have they played anyone good yet this year ?

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:28 pm
by Run4Fun2009
topgun23 wrote:From what I saw from the mandan devils lake game, mandan should have won that easily. I think the mandan jamestown game should be pretty easy for mandan
And I'm not sure, but wasn't red river supposed to be worst in the east this year?? Have they played anyone good yet this year ?


GFRR has beaten Williston at home 35-0 and has beaten Jamestown 26-0 on the road. GFRR vs. GFC should actually be an interesting game IMO.

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:51 am
by bighouse
I think the picks are good I just don't think there all going to be easy wins

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:08 pm
by Dawaterboy
Century wins over Dickinson 20 to 13

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:24 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Run4Fun2009 wrote:Friday, September 7th

Devils Lake (2-0) @ Bismarck (2-0)
Jamestown (0-2) @ Mandan (1-1)
Williston (1-1) @ Minot (2-0)
Century (1-1) @ Dickinson (1-1)
West Fargo (0-2) @ Fargo Davies (1-1)
Fargo South (1-1) @ Fargo North (0-2)
GF Red River (2-0) @ GF Central (0-2)

YTD: 15-2


YTD: 21-3 after Week 3

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:20 am
by bighouse
Not so easy for century, they actually got pretty lucky

Re: Week 3 - 2012

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:58 am
by go maji
Minot 42
Williston 0

Not really close. Williston had a 60+ yard pass play that was called back because of holding.
Even without Kolton Larson. Even though some of Willistons big plays might have been prevented had larson been healthy.