Page 3 of 4

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:09 pm
by witherspoon
The Schwab wrote:
winner-within wrote:
panthercub wrote:
winner-within wrote:in fact some Organizations would rather lose than win to get to the right bracket!
Play real good team at home or play average on the road


Thats not how it works winner! If you win your region you play the other region's #4 seed if you take 2nd in your region you host the other's #3 seed! So ya see, if you win, you play a weaker team, you wise guy! Now, I hope WL wins by 40 also! And yes, witherspoon must be winners relative! :lol: :roll:



Seeds dont mean Squat.....I've seen 4th seeds blow out #1 seeds.....its all timing there Babybear!! :wink:


Do you have any examples of this?

South Border #4 beat Wahalla #1 44-0 3 years ago i beleive is this correct [url]flip[/url], or was it #3 vs #2?

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:47 pm
by Hinsa
There were no number 4 seeds in the playoffs in 9-man 3 years ago. That just started this year with the region realignment.

Learn your facts about "little guy football" as you call it before you start making wild claims about 4 seeds blowing out 1 seeds. Like it or not, your Tornadoes are in "little guy football" now. You better get used to it.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:53 pm
by winner-within
I watched Nebraska pound #9 (in the nation) Michigan St.....to many Sports correct folks on this forum.....my biggest peeve about this forum.....
If it isn't SUPPOSED to happen, it better not happen

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:04 pm
by Flip
SB was a #4 seed in '08 and beat NB, a #2 seed, pretty bad. I don't think it was a shutout.

Not sure why Hinsa, doesn't think their were #4 seeds 3 years ago.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:34 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Flip wrote:SB was a #4 seed in '08 and beat NB, a #2 seed, pretty bad. I don't think it was a shutout.

Not sure why Hinsa, doesn't think their were #4 seeds 3 years ago.


2008
(Region 1 #4) South Border defeated (Region 3 #2) North Border 54-12
(Region 5 #4) Mohall-Lansford-Sherwood defeated (Region 4 #2) Wells County 32-6

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:09 pm
by winner-within
Hinsa wrote:There were no number 4 seeds in the playoffs in 9-man 3 years ago. That just started this year with the region realignment.

Learn your facts about "little guy football" as you call it before you start making wild claims about 4 seeds blowing out 1 seeds. Like it or not, your Tornadoes are in "little guy football" now. You better get used to it.


You've never heard of Youth Foot Ball??...4th 5th 6th grade football, its alot of fun....come on Hinsa... :lol:

their not my tornadoes....but I have Tornadoes.....and believe me their in it for the Long haul brother!

a 4 has never beat a 1....never....or better yet there has never been a major upset in ND Class B Football in the playoffs?? Hmm! Now thats what I call Politically correct.....or better yet! Sports Ignorance ....

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:56 am
by panthercub
I would love for my community to have 4th 5th and 6th grade football! That is the age where the learning process starts and coaches can teach their philosophies and the students will bring that with them as they mature into football players!

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:20 pm
by classB4ever
Hinsa wrote:There were no number 4 seeds in the playoffs in 9-man 3 years ago. That just started this year with the region realignment.

Learn your facts about "little guy football" as you call it before you start making wild claims about 4 seeds blowing out 1 seeds. Like it or not, your Tornadoes are in "little guy football" now. You better get used to it.


I believe winner was referring to 4th, 5th and 6th grade FB jamborees they hold each Saturday morning during the season. Langdon, Cavalier, Park River, Larimore, Grafton and maybe M-M each holding one. Could be wrong on that.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:31 pm
by winner-within
classB4ever wrote:
Hinsa wrote:There were no number 4 seeds in the playoffs in 9-man 3 years ago. That just started this year with the region realignment.

Learn your facts about "little guy football" as you call it before you start making wild claims about 4 seeds blowing out 1 seeds. Like it or not, your Tornadoes are in "little guy football" now. You better get used to it.


I believe winner was referring to 4th, 5th and 6th grade FB jamborees they hold each Saturday morning during the season. Langdon, Cavalier, Park River, Larimore, Grafton and maybe M-M each holding one. Could be wrong on that.


North Border....no M-M, yet... the more the merrier though....its a blast!!!

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:34 pm
by winner-within
panthercub wrote:I would love for my community to have 4th 5th and 6th grade football! That is the age where the learning process starts and coaches can teach their philosophies and the students will bring that with them as they mature into football players!



and there are no Skilled positioned players....believe me....
you certainly don't want to tell a Player at any age he's playing a skilled position.....you tell him to play his position to the best of his ability and if he don't, there will be somebody else playing it.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:45 pm
by Hinsa
Run4Fun2009 wrote:
Flip wrote:SB was a #4 seed in '08 and beat NB, a #2 seed, pretty bad. I don't think it was a shutout.

Not sure why Hinsa, doesn't think their were #4 seeds 3 years ago.


2008
(Region 1 #4) South Border defeated (Region 3 #2) North Border 54-12
(Region 5 #4) Mohall-Lansford-Sherwood defeated (Region 4 #2) Wells County 32-6


I apologize. I did not have my facts straight and I have egg on my face. Winner, I was wrong.

I also misunderstood Winner's "little guy ball" comment. I thought he was referring to 9-man ball, not grades 4-6. My apologies again.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:51 pm
by The Schwab
I would still like to see an example of a 1 seed getting blown out by a 4 seed as it was claimed earlier in this topic.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:08 pm
by thunder
The Schwab wrote:I would still like to see an example of a 1 seed getting blown out by a 4 seed as it was claimed earlier in this topic.


You guys sure get off the subject line.......

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:31 pm
by panthercub
I still like NGS by 6

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:26 pm
by Buck
I will also take NGS but by 8.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:48 pm
by thunder
Imperials - 30, Warbirds - 12

The Warbirds pass defense proves to be their downfall in this one.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:42 pm
by EHS1998
Game Update:

WL 6
NGS 0

2nd quarter

Sounds like the wind is playing a factor, per the radio announcer.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:50 pm
by footballchicken
how about the fumbled punt by WL, but the refs made them replay down because they didnt know what happened??????

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:51 pm
by EHS1998
footballchicken wrote:how about the fumbled punt by WL, but the refs made them replay down because they didnt know what happened??????


I must have tuned in after that.

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:56 pm
by EHS1998
Game update:

NGS 8
WL 6
2:26 left 2nd Quarter

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:08 pm
by footballchicken
How about that press box.....hahah!!

lllllets get louuuud

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:40 pm
by Buck
Update??????

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:50 pm
by footballchicken
20-14 Napoleon - 2:53 in 3rd Quarter - WL ball

No passing game with wind

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:53 pm
by footballchicken
4th and 1 stop by Napoleon - late 3rd

Re: 9-Man Semifinals: W-L @ Napoleon-GS

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:10 pm
by footballchicken
4th Quarter -6:30, WL no timeouts left

NGS up 20-14 just pounding and milking clock