bigpoppakdog wrote:garrison runs basically student body left student body right. I don't know about the other teams. Do they utilize other running backs out of this formation?
bigpoppakdog wrote:nice response! I did notice the examples you used discussed using quarterbacks. Its hard for me to believe that you can't train a kid to take a snap and hand the ball off or pitch the ball like a standard pro set offense. You don't have to be a great athlete to get the ball to the running backs. These other teams that you indicated use a form of this have drastic variations compared to what garrison does. But if you don't have the athletes to do it you have to stay basic. I've watched garrison and I believe they have athletes to run a pro set or I formation for sure.
bigpoppakdog wrote:d_fense wrote:bigpoppakdog wrote:nice response! I did notice the examples you used discussed using quarterbacks. Its hard for me to believe that you can't train a kid to take a snap and hand the ball off or pitch the ball like a standard pro set offense. You don't have to be a great athlete to get the ball to the running backs. These other teams that you indicated use a form of this have drastic variations compared to what garrison does. But if you don't have the athletes to do it you have to stay basic. I've watched garrison and I believe they have athletes to run a pro set or I formation for sure.
I don't think there is any offense that is easier to prepair for than one that runs out of the pro set. Almost any D can be played vs. a pro set. When you (Garrison) start to put that many offensive players in a tight area that are only a few D's that will work. And, it is likely the one you have been working on all season to prepare for the other 7 teams on your schedule will not be one that will work.
I highly disagree. Pro set doesn't allow defenses to key their eyes on just one back. Makes things much more difficult when you can use cross bucks, traps, pitches either way to either back, traps with the wings, reverses, middle screens, power to either side. Garrison's offense to me, is by far the simplest ever run and the easiest to defend. Case in point what are they avg. for points the last two years? under 6? Also agree its the coaches job to give his team the best chance at winning, but is this offense the best chance they have? Maybe so, and if it is, then so be it. But for two years averaging close to 6 or 7 points per game one has to wonder. I've seen their players, seems like there is a player that throws the ball as well as any other qb's from the area.
bigpoppakdog wrote:well it looks like they're continuing to develop non quality players with an offense for non quality players.
d_fense wrote:
You don't know football if think that offense is designed for non quality players.
bigpoppakdog wrote:the offense has nothing to do with my team(?). I just wanted thoughts on it and from what i've gathered its chosen because garrison does not have quality athletes to run a regular(what other word could I use?) offense. But if they continue to do this aren't they encouraging non quality athletes?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests