Page 1 of 1

2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:36 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Friday, September 6th
RV Linton-HMB 6 @ Carrington 24
RV Milnor-North Sargent 48 @ Hillsboro-Central Valley 27
Kidder County 6 @ Northern Cass 20
Ellendale-Edgeley-Kulm 8 @ RV Oakes 58

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie 12 @ #3 Park River-FL 20
#2 Larimore 32 @ North Border 0
Langdon 12 @ May-Port-CG 25
North Prairie 68 @ Midway-Minto 14

#5 Williams County 0 @ RV Rugby 28
Harvey-Wells County 36 @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's 8
Bottineau 0 @ Velva 49

#1 Hazen 49 @ Southern McLean 6
#4 Killdeer 49 @ Heart River 14
Garrison-Max 43 @ Central McLean 2

Saturday, September 7th
Des Lacs-Burlington 46 vs. Surrey 12
Mandan Sophomores 12 @ New Salem-Glen Ullin 53

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:26 pm
by lovwatchingsports
Friday, September 6th
Linton-HMB (1-0) @ Carrington (1-0) just because
Milnor-North Sargent (0-1) @ Hillsboro-Central Valley (1-0) just had to
Kidder County (0-1) @ Northern Cass (0-1)
Ellendale-Edgeley-Kulm (0-1) @ Oakes (1-0)

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie (1-0) @ Park River-FL (1-0)
Larimore (1-0) @ North Border (1-0)
Langdon (0-1) @ May-Port-CG (0-1)
North Prairie (1-1) @ Midway-Minto (0-1)

Williams County (2-0) @ Rugby (0-1)
Harvey-Wells County (0-1) @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's (1-0)
Bottineau (0-1) @ Velva (0-1)

Hazen (1-0) @ Southern McLean (0-1)
Killdeer (1-0) @ Heart River (0-1)
Garrison-Max (0-1) @ Central McLean (0-1) never thought I would do that

Saturday, September 7th
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-0) vs. Surrey (1-0) @ Minot St.
Mandan Sophomores @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (1-0)

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:05 pm
by Fballfan29
Carrington over Linton HMB
Hillsboro over Milnor-North Sargent
Northern Cass over Kidder County
Oakes over EEK

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie over Park River
North Border over Larimore
May-Port-CG over Langdon
North Prairei over Midway-Minto

Rugby over Williams county
Harvey over Berthold
Vevla over Bottineau

Hazen over Southern McLean
Killdeer over Heart River(sorry to ruin the homecoming)
Central McLean over Garrison

Surrey over DLB
New salem-Glen Ullin over Mandan Sophmore

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:52 pm
by ndsportsfan44
Friday, September 6th
Linton-HMB (1-0) @ Carrington (1-0)
Milnor-North Sargent (0-1) @ Hillsboro-Central Valley (1-0)
Kidder County (0-1) @ Northern Cass (0-1)
Ellendale-Edgeley-Kulm (0-1) @ Oakes (1-0)

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie (1-0) @ Park River-FL (1-0)
Larimore (1-0) @ North Border (1-0)
Langdon (0-1) @ May-Port-CG (0-1)
North Prairie (1-1) @ Midway-Minto (0-1)

Williams County (2-0) @ Rugby (0-1)
Harvey-Wells County (0-1) @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's (1-0)
Bottineau (0-1) @ Velva (0-1)

Hazen (1-0) @ Southern McLean (0-1)
Killdeer (1-0) @ Heart River (0-1)
Garrison-Max (0-1) @ Central McLean (0-1)

Saturday, September 7th
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-0) vs. Surrey (1-0) @ Minot St.
Mandan Sophomores @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (1-0)

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 2:01 pm
by Run4Fun2009
Friday, September 6th
RV Linton-HMB (1-0) @ Carrington (1-0)
RV Milnor-North Sargent (0-1) @ Hillsboro-Central Valley (1-0)
Kidder County (0-1) @ Northern Cass (0-1)
Ellendale-Edgeley-Kulm (0-1) @ RV Oakes (1-0)

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie (1-0) @ #3 Park River-FL (1-0)
#2 Larimore (1-0) @ North Border (1-0)
Langdon (0-1) @ May-Port-CG (0-1)
North Prairie (1-1) @ Midway-Minto (0-1)

#5 Williams County (2-0) @ RV Rugby (0-1)
Harvey-Wells County (0-1) @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's (1-0)
Bottineau (0-1) @ Velva (0-1)

#1 Hazen (1-0) @ Southern McLean (0-1)
#4 Killdeer (1-0) @ Heart River (0-1)
Garrison-Max (0-1) @ Central McLean (0-1)

Saturday, September 7th
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-0) vs. Surrey (1-0) @ Minot St.
Mandan Sophomores @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (1-0)

YTD: 14-6

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:24 pm
by Hinsa
Friday, September 6th
RV Linton-HMB (1-0) @ Carrington (1-0)
RV Milnor-North Sargent (0-1) @ Hillsboro-Central Valley (1-0)
Kidder County (0-1) @ Northern Cass (0-1)
Ellendale-Edgeley-Kulm (0-1) @ RV Oakes (1-0)

Lakota/Edmore/Dakota Prairie (1-0) @ #3 Park River-FL (1-0)
#2 Larimore (1-0) @ North Border (1-0)
Langdon (0-1) @ May-Port-CG (0-1)
North Prairie (1-1) @ Midway-Minto (0-1)

#5 Williams County (2-0) @ RV Rugby (0-1)
Harvey-Wells County (0-1) @ Berthold-Our Redeemer's (1-0)
Bottineau (0-1) @ Velva (0-1)

#1 Hazen (1-0) @ Southern McLean (0-1)
#4 Killdeer (1-0) @ Heart River (0-1)
Garrison-Max (0-1) @ Central McLean (0-1)

Saturday, September 7th
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-0) vs. Surrey (1-0) @ Minot St.
Mandan Sophomores @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (1-0)

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:35 pm
by prepfan14
Linton vs Carrington isn't even a game carringtons young squad is killin them in the run game Piece of advice if #24 is in the open field don't even try!

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:24 pm
by Indy5
prepfan14 wrote:Linton vs Carrington isn't even a game carringtons young squad is killin them in the run game Piece of advice if #24 is in the open field don't even try!

Carrington has enough talent that they should still be AA. And if they hadn't dropped their co-op with PBK they still would be.

And this isn't me complaining because I have no connection to A football. I simply would like to see teams that are able to compete in higher classes do so.

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:50 pm
by PrepFBrules
Indy5 wrote:
prepfan14 wrote:Linton vs Carrington isn't even a game carringtons young squad is killin them in the run game Piece of advice if #24 is in the open field don't even try!

Carrington has enough talent that they should still be AA. And if they hadn't dropped their co-op with PBK they still would be.

And this isn't me complaining because I have no connection to A football. I simply would like to see teams that are able to compete in higher classes do so.


Carrington has had a nice run in AA ball, with virtually no help from PBK, hence dropping the co-op. That being said, Carrington is an "A" level team. Their enrollment does not support the depth needed to sustain a strong program year after year in "AA". This year's 10th & 11th graders will be legitimate contenders for the next couple years, but lets not kid ourselves, they are no Fargo Shanley, they'll have all they can handle with the Oakes & Hazens of "A".

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:56 pm
by lovwatchingsports
PrepFBrules wrote:
Indy5 wrote:
prepfan14 wrote:Linton vs Carrington isn't even a game carringtons young squad is killin them in the run game Piece of advice if #24 is in the open field don't even try!

Carrington has enough talent that they should still be AA. And if they hadn't dropped their co-op with PBK they still would be.

And this isn't me complaining because I have no connection to A football. I simply would like to see teams that are able to compete in higher classes do so.


Carrington has had a nice run in AA ball, with virtually no help from PBK, hence dropping the co-op. That being said, Carrington is an "A" level team. Their enrollment does not support the depth needed to sustain a strong program year after year in "AA". This year's 10th & 11th graders will be legitimate contenders for the next couple years, but lets not kid ourselves, they are no Fargo Shanley, they'll have all they can handle with the Oakes & Hazens of "A".


True

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:23 pm
by Indy5
PrepFBrules wrote:
Carrington has had a nice run in AA ball, with virtually no help from PBK, hence dropping the co-op. That being said, Carrington is an "A" level team. Their enrollment does not support the depth needed to sustain a strong program year after year in "AA". This year's 10th & 11th graders will be legitimate contenders for the next couple years, but lets not kid ourselves, they are no Fargo Shanley, they'll have all they can handle with the Oakes & Hazens of "A".

And this is where the real question lies. Would you rather be a tough out in the playoffs every year in AA, or be a top contender for a state title in A. For me, I guess it's a pride thing. You should want the challenge of trying to knock those AA schools and maybe just maybe win a title as an underdog. You just said they have good sophmores and juniors. Why not stay AA for 2 more years, then drop when your talent and possibly numbers (?) dictate that?

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:55 am
by ndlionsfan
in my opinion, Carrington, Rugby, Hazen etc all fit better in AA than GBC and MVE. I understand dropping PBK from the coop, but would have loved for them to stay up in AA at the same time. But our system is based on enrollment figures and with all the different coops of those other two teams that dictates where they play.

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:30 am
by PrepFBrules
Indy5 wrote:
PrepFBrules wrote:
Carrington has had a nice run in AA ball, with virtually no help from PBK, hence dropping the co-op. That being said, Carrington is an "A" level team. Their enrollment does not support the depth needed to sustain a strong program year after year in "AA". This year's 10th & 11th graders will be legitimate contenders for the next couple years, but lets not kid ourselves, they are no Fargo Shanley, they'll have all they can handle with the Oakes & Hazens of "A".

And this is where the real question lies. Would you rather be a tough out in the playoffs every year in AA, or be a top contender for a state title in A. For me, I guess it's a pride thing. You should want the challenge of trying to knock those AA schools and maybe just maybe win a title as an underdog. You just said they have good sophmores and juniors. Why not stay AA for 2 more years, then drop when your talent and possibly numbers (?) dictate that?


Enrollment for top 6 AA schools: 195,173,161,161,159 &142
Enrollment for top 6 A schools: 107,105,102,100,100 & 100
Enrollment for Carrington: 88

I somewhat agree with the underdog argument, but I stand by my statement that Carrington is an "A" level school. The numbers are what they are. Yes, they have some talent that will make them competitive, but like any small school they're just a couple years away from a 2-6 season.

Re: 2013 Week 2 Schedule

PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:18 am
by sportscrazy
I agree Carrington is a Class A school by enrollment standards. I totally understand them moving down to Class A because their situation allows it. Its not about individual choices and what we as fans decide we would like to see. The administrators have to look at what's good for the program. Right now I can think of three teams that opted to stay up at class A rather than go to 9 man. Velva has been below the 9 man threshold for a few years now And both Milnor- North Sargent and Linton could have both chose to go down. Both teams have received voted in the Class A ballots and I would wager that both will be playoff teams. Its even reasonable to say that had they moved down to 9 man They could be even more dominant with a much smaller travel radius. But their schools situation was to stay up because future enrollments have them growing so why go down then come back up. Maybe Carrington is experiencing the opposite a down ward trend so it made sense to drop when they did. We don't know the whole situation. I do know if things stay as they are I believe Lisbon will drop down to class A in the next plan I should say if they choose too.