North Dakota Preps

Posted: **Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:45 pm**

RECORDS:

Region 1
Oak Grove 0 @ Northern Cass 34
Milnor-North Sargent 39 @ MPCG 0
Kidder County 23 @ Oakes 34
RV Linton-HMB 26 @ #4 Maple Valley-Enderlin 25

Region 2
Larimore 21 @ #1 Harvey-Wells County 38
#5 Park River-FL 40 @ Langdon-Munich 0
Hatton-Northwood 8 @ North Prairie 33
Westhope-Newburg 42 @ Midway-Minto 7

Region 3
#5 Berthold-Our Redeemer's 6 @ #3 Stanley-Powers Lake 52
RV Velva 38 @ New Town 8
Garrison-Max 0 @ Watford City 35
Des Lacs-Burlington 0 @ Williams County 13

Region 4
#2 Hazen 52 @ Richardton-Taylor-Hebron 6
Grant County-Flasher 16 @ Killdeer 40
Southern McLean 0 @ New Salem-Glen Ullin 46
RV Heart River 83 @ Standing Rock 0

Posted: **Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:37 am**

The stanley/berthold game should be game of the week. boths teams won every game and its a good test for both teams, I got stanley 28 to 14 in a smash mouth game of football

Posted: **Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:24 pm**

The Linton-HMB @ MV-E is a big test for both teams in Region 1. I will go w/ MV-E by a touchdown.

Posted: **Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:47 am**

Run4Fun2009 wrote:RECORDS: (Reg.; Overall)

Region 1
Oak Grove (0-3; 0-4) @ Northern Cass (1-2; 1-4) *hoping for the upset though*
Milnor-North Sargent (2-1; 2-2) @ MPCG (0-3; 0-4)
Kidder County (1-2; 1-3) @ Oakes (2-1; 3-1)
Linton-HMB (3-0; 3-1) @ Maple Valley-Enderlin (3-0; 4-0)

Region 2
Larimore (2-1; 3-1) @ Harvey-Wells County (3-0; 4-0)
Park River-FL (3-0; 3-1) @ Langdon-Munich (0-3; 1-3)
Hatton-Northwood (1-2; 2-2) @ North Prairie (1-2; 2-2)
Westhope-Newburg (2-1; 2-2) @ Midway-Minto (0-3; 0-3)

Region 3
Berthold-Our Redeemer's (3-0; 4-0) @ Stanley-Powers Lake (3-0; 4-0)
Velva (2-1; 2-2) @ New Town (0-3; 0-5)
Garrison-Max (1-2; 1-4) @ Watford City (1-2; 1-3)
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-2; 1-3) @ Williams County (1-2; 1-4)

Region 4
Hazen (3-0; 4-0) @ Richardton-Taylor-Hebron (1-2; 2-3)
Grant County-Flasher (1-2; 2-2) @ Killdeer (2-1; 2-2)
Southern McLean (1-2; 2-2) @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (2-1; 3-1)
Heart River (2-1; 3-1) @ Standing Rock (0-3; 1-3)

Y.T.D.: 47-18

Posted: **Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:55 pm**

scoobyx2 wrote:The Linton-HMB @ MV-E is a big test for both teams in Region 1. I will go w/ MV-E by a touchdown.

Lets hear a score Scooby...how much scoring should we expect?

Posted: **Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:04 am**

MNTwinsFan wrote:
scoobyx2 wrote:The Linton-HMB @ MV-E is a big test for both teams in Region 1. I will go w/ MV-E by a touchdown.

Lets hear a score Scooby...how much scoring should we expect?

27-20 MVE

Posted: **Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:03 am**

Run4Fun2009 wrote:RECORDS: (Reg.; Overall)

Region 1
Oak Grove (0-3; 0-4) @ Northern Cass (1-2; 1-4)
Milnor-North Sargent (2-1; 2-2) @ MPCG (0-3; 0-4)
Kidder County (1-2; 1-3) @ Oakes (2-1; 3-1)
Linton-HMB (3-0; 3-1) @ Maple Valley-Enderlin (3-0; 4-0)

Region 2
Larimore (2-1; 3-1) @ Harvey-Wells County (3-0; 4-0)
Park River-FL (3-0; 3-1) @ Langdon-Munich (0-3; 1-3)
Hatton-Northwood (1-2; 2-2) @ North Prairie (1-2; 2-2)
Westhope-Newburg (2-1; 2-2) @ Midway-Minto (0-3; 0-3)

Region 3
Berthold-Our Redeemer's (3-0; 4-0) @ Stanley-Powers Lake (3-0; 4-0)
Velva (2-1; 2-2) @ New Town (0-3; 0-5)
Garrison-Max (1-2; 1-4) @ Watford City (1-2; 1-3)
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-2; 1-3) @ Williams County (1-2; 1-4)

Region 4
Hazen (3-0; 4-0) @ Richardton-Taylor-Hebron (1-2; 2-3)
Grant County-Flasher (1-2; 2-2) @ Killdeer (2-1; 2-2)
Southern McLean (1-2; 2-2) @ New Salem-Glen Ullin (2-1; 3-1)
Heart River (2-1; 3-1) @ Standing Rock (0-3; 1-3)

15-1 last week
50-16 ytd

Posted: **Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:26 pm**

The Berthold/Stanley game should be a good one. Lots of people picking Stanley, which is understandable being the 3rd ranked team in the state. I wouldnt sleep on Berthold tho. Have a good running game, and can also throw the ball very well. Defense has done a pretty decent job all year also, starters have allowed 4 tds on the year. The other 2 tds came from the Watford City starters in the 4th qtr against the jv. Its going to be a very fun game to watch.

Posted: **Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:52 am**

hsfootballfan wrote:The Berthold/Stanley game should be a good one. Lots of people picking Stanley, which is understandable being the 3rd ranked team in the state. I wouldnt sleep on Berthold tho. Have a good running game, and can also throw the ball very well. Defense has done a pretty decent job all year also, starters have allowed 4 tds on the year. The other 2 tds came from the Watford City starters in the 4th qtr against the jv. Its going to be a very fun game to watch.

Berthhold has a very good team, but Stanley has the reputation of a good team year in year out. Not everybody is picking Stanley, Velva would like to see Bethold to win. If that would happen then if they could pull off a win against them it would be a three way tie.

Posted: **Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:21 pm**

Stanley by a TD being on home tuff. IMO Game of the week for the region. 21-14

Region 3
Berthold-Our Redeemer's (3-0; 4-0) @ Stanley-Powers Lake (3-0; 4-0)
Velva (2-1; 2-2) @ New Town (0-3; 0-5)
Garrison-Max (1-2; 1-4) @ Watford City (1-2; 1-3)
Des Lacs-Burlington (1-2; 1-3) @ Williams County (1-2; 1-4)

Posted: **Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:00 pm**

Stanley-Powers Lake hosting Lewis & Clark-Our Redeemers will be broadcast on Minot's KHRT-AM 1320 and online at www.khrt.com

Posted: **Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:15 pm**

Just came from Stanley Powers Lake/Berthold OR game...Stanley 52, Berthold OR 6. I was not expecting that. SPL just keeps getting better and better as the season progresses and they have so many versatile players. They all have a great time on the field and are very good friends too. They are a very fun team to watch. Roerich had 239 yds rushing at half...He had an absolutley awesome game. I would be surprised if he is not all state pick this year.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:34 am**

I agree with ya mama_bird, not the game i was expecting to see. I thought Berthold would put up atleast somewhat of a fight. After seeing the Bombers the last 2 weeks, Velva will beat them fairly handily next friday nite unless there are some "mental toughness" changes. To play with the Velvas, Stanleys, Harveys and Hazen teams here in the west, u need to be very hard nosed, Berthold is lacking that as a team. That is just my opinion tho.

Posted: **Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:08 pm**

how do u beat a team 83-0 thats rediculous. i dont care if its standing rock thats classless

Posted: **Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:02 pm**

bison football73 wrote:how do u beat a team 83-0 thats rediculous. i dont care if its standing rock thats classless

true

Posted: **Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:20 pm**

bison football73 wrote:how do u beat a team 83-0 thats rediculous. i dont care if its standing rock thats classless

Ouch. I know when our team is doing well we are putting younger players in. However, it has not seemed to make much difference in the games. Does Heart River have the numbers to put JV in at the half or where ever that needs to be done?

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:09 pm**

Heart River coach left his starters in for two more scores against Southern McLean also. I don't think much of him as a coach. His players were humble in victory and even Sr. Jordan Strecker realized that pounding a hundred pound freshmean into the dirt is a little ridiculous. He backed off, I wish his coach was as mature.

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:29 pm**

mama_bird wrote:
bison football73 wrote:how do u beat a team 83-0 thats rediculous. i dont care if its standing rock thats classless

Ouch. I know when our team is doing well we are putting younger players in. However, it has not seemed to make much difference in the games. Does Heart River have the numbers to put JV in at the half or where ever that needs to be done?

idk if they have enough players to field an entire jv but they definately have enough players too take out there top players i.e. strecker and ewoniuk

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:31 pm**

i also heard they didnt take their starters out until 4 minutes left in the 4th. absolutely rediculous

North Dakota Preps

Week 5

Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5

Re: Week 5