defense

throughout the state

Re: defense

Postby Sioux4ever » Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:58 am

dcs01 wrote:ryan howatt is playing on the second line i belive and there like 23-1 i think they lost thier first game when he was home for his sisters wedding......bummer


A quick look to their website shows that he has played in 18 of the teams 26 games, 9 goals and 3 assists for 12 points. tied for 10th highest on the team.
Sioux4ever
NDPreps All-Conference
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:09 am

Re: defense

Postby koozy » Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:59 pm

AC-DC wrote:I still say Cole Casteel, #26 Crosby, is a solid defenseman. If he didn't need to skate hard for over 40 minutes in every 60, he would produce more big plays. Seeing that he is just a Junior, we'll definitely see more from him.


yea Casteel isnt that great. sorry but hes not.
koozy
 

Re: defense

Postby hockeystar11 » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:13 am

hahahaha saw cole casteel play tonight..NOTHIN special..average jr gold player....wouldnt stick out if on a better team.
hockeystar11
 

Re: defense

Postby dcs01 » Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:01 am

only time i noticed casteel was in his penelties
dcs01
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Re: defense

Postby AC-DC » Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:59 am

Do you guys have something to promote about Langdon or another defense or do you just prefer to dis everyone else?

Not that any one cares, but Cole had a pinched nerve and couldn't feel his hand most of the game. Boys say he's the toughest kid they've seen. He'll stick out the weekend.
It may not be the end of the world, but you can see it from here!
User avatar
AC-DC
NDPreps All-Conference
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: At Crosby - Divide County

Re: defense

Postby dcs01 » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:37 pm

were simply saying hes nothing special if i saw anything from crosby is was #88 but cole didint live up to how good you say he is
dcs01
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Re: defense

Postby tadam6 » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:33 pm

casteel isn't very good at all...skates decent thats about it...runs his mouth a little too much and complains about calls...
tadam6
 

Re: defense

Postby koozy » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:37 pm

pinched nerve..wonder how he got that..hahahahaha
koozy
 

Re: defense

Postby AC-DC » Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:49 pm

I'm still waiting to hear about Langdon's defense. Take away an own goal deflection and a couple of goalie errors and that was Crosby's game. It will be a good rematch at the Crosby Barn in January.
It may not be the end of the world, but you can see it from here!
User avatar
AC-DC
NDPreps All-Conference
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: At Crosby - Divide County

Re: defense

Postby dcs01 » Sat Dec 15, 2007 5:38 pm

no it really isint going to be a good rematch our goalie played probably the worst game of his life our number on player was out with a fighting 2 game misconduct and one player broke a rib if langdon played there best game im sure we could see a repeat of last years games
dcs01
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Re: defense

Postby #18 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:26 pm

im glad that langdon has lowered its expectations, they now consider crosby as a rivalry hahaha
#18
 

Re: defense

Postby dcs01 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:38 pm

hey if your not from our town your our rivarly thats just how it works
dcs01
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Re: defense

Postby #18 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:41 pm

no its teams that play against each other and they have close games that are intense. i just find it quite hilarious that it was 7 to 5
#18
 

Re: defense

Postby dcs01 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:54 pm

i find it funny that you wernt good enough to play high school
dcs01
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Re: defense

Postby #18 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:03 pm

i never tried out hahahaha wow your just not going to win this one
#18
 

Re: defense

Postby hockeystar11 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:11 pm

just cuz the warriors are gonna light fargo up come state tourney time doesnt mean u have to rag on everyone else.
hockeystar11
 

Re: defense

Postby #18 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:20 pm

the shots were 65 to 19 that goalie careered it and they won 7 to 2
#18
 

Re: defense

Postby koozy » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:10 am

#18 wrote:the shots were 65 to 19 that goalie careered it and they won 7 to 2



take away the 3 weak goals they had and it would have been a better game..
koozy
 

Re: defense

Postby sports03 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:12 am

Not that any one cares, but Cole had a pinched nerve and couldn't feel his hand most of the game. Boys say he's the toughest kid they've seen. He'll stick out the weekend.


you are right no one cares that he had a pinched nerve in his back.... and what boys say he's the toughest kid around??? i'm just wondering cause no one i talk to that has watched him play thinks he's the toughest kid around
sports03
 

Re: defense

Postby sports03 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:13 am

I'm still waiting to hear about Langdon's defense. Take away an own goal deflection and a couple of goalie errors and that was Crosby's game. It will be a good rematch at the Crosby Barn in January.


talk about goal deflections casteel scored on his own team today against the flyers
sports03
 

Re: defense

Postby sports03 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:14 am

#18 wrote:
the shots were 65 to 19 that goalie careered it and they won 7 to 2


take away the 3 weak goals they had and it would have been a better game..


thats a lie
sports03
 

Re: defense

Postby koozy » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:17 am

is it? maybe take away the flames players that the flyers picked up and it would have been a better game..should i say that instead
koozy
 

Re: defense

Postby sports03 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:21 am

no you should say the flyers dominated them and the warriors got 2 lucky goals thats waht you should say
sports03
 

Re: defense

Postby koozy » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:29 am

sports03 wrote:no you should say the flyers dominated them and the warriors got 2 lucky goals thats waht you should say


the flyers are pretty dominate, no getting around that. but you have to ask yourself why, and why is bc of the flames players that they picked up, no getting around that either.
koozy
 

Re: defense

Postby bigcityhockey » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:31 am

koozy wrote:is it? maybe take away the flames players that the flyers picked up and it would have been a better game..should i say that instead


Who says anyone is anyone's players? Next year the Flyers kids may quit and go to Flames. It is called registration. BTW, none of the 7 goals scored were from players that ever played Flames.
bigcityhockey
NDPreps Reserve
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to NDAHA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron